Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ʻIlima Lei Tohi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ʻIlima Lei Tohi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. The one general reference is a dead link. The article does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO. WP:BEFORE revealed no WP:IS WP:RS containing material that meets WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in depth. Being related to a public figure is not notable WP:INVALIDBIO WP:NOTINHERITED. BLP articles should strictly follow WP:V and WP:N sourcing requirements. // Timothy :: talk 09:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 09:25, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 19:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This probably belongs more in an Oceania/Pacific-related AfD list, there's no Africa connection. Humansdorpie (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the sourcing is not even remotely close to showing notability. Wikipedia is not a tabloid providing coverage on every person somewhwere alleged to be the illegitimate daughter of a monarch, we need sourcing that is actually reliable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no references, no apparent notability.--IdiotSavant (talk) 21:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.