Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report

    User:2400:1A00:BB20:2506:70DF:A711:1461:1EF0 reported by User:VolatileAnomaly (Result: Declined)

    [edit]

    Page: Sandeep Lamichhane (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 2400:1A00:BB20:2506:70DF:A711:1461:1EF0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 04:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 04:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC) "https://indianexpress.com/article/sports/cricket/sandeep-lamichhane-rape-case-innocent-t20-world-cup-nepal-high-court-9331388/ This is the link of news which says he was declared innocent. https://risingnepaldaily.com/news/50553#:~:text=By%20TRN%20Online%2C%20Kathmandu%2C%20Oct,by%20issuing%20a%20press%20release. Sandeep Lamichhane was granted US visa for WCL2 series, whoever is doing this is for defamation, that part is really not needed, if someone has to get warning they are them."
    3. 03:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC) "He was declared innocent by the court, so that part is really not needed, why to put the stain, can you please stop ultra woke nonsense."
    4. 03:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC) "Lawsuit and allegation part is not needed, ban whoever is editing this."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 03:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC) "/* Sandeep Lamichhane */ new section"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 03:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC) on User talk:2400:1A00:BB20:2506:70DF:A711:1461:1EF0 "/* Sandeep Lamichhane */ new section"

    Comments:

    Repeated attempts to remove sourced allegations regarding public figure. Notified user of policy on talkpage. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 04:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    VolatileAnomaly, please have a look at WP:BLPRESTORE and seek a consensus on the talk page before restoring the disputed content. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:BLPN is also a good option in cases like this as they will often provide more nuanced feedback and consensus than simply "all this content should stay" vs "all this content should be removed". At first glance this does look like whitewashing of notable and sourced content, but it does need better review before restoring wholesale.-- Ponyobons mots 22:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you ToBeFree and Ponyo for the feedback. I happened upon those edits while doing recent changes patrol and will be more cautious in the future before restoring disputed content. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 03:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you and no worries ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ImagineDragonsFan101 reported by User:Soetermans (Result: Partial blocked for one month)

    [edit]

    Page: Fortnite Festival (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: ImagineDragonsFan101 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 23:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "Added Information"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 22:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC) to 22:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
      1. 22:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "Song announcements"
      2. 22:44, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "Important Information about song announcements"
    3. 22:37, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "Added Important Information; with property linking"
    4. 22:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "Added Important Content"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 21:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on Dan Reynolds."
    2. 22:00, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "re"
    3. 22:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "re"
    4. 23:06, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing."
    5. 23:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC) "re"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    New user that doesn't seem to be willing to listen to messages, advice and warnings. Assuming good faith, but this is disruptive. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 23:10, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Madhumitha Hegde reported by User:Ratnahastin (Result: Blocked indefinitely for now)

    [edit]

    Page: The Sabarmati Report (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Madhumitha Hegde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 13:47, 23 November 2024
    2. 19:58, 19 November 2024
    3. 15:59, 18 November 2024
    4. 14:52, 17 November 2024



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [1]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [2]

    Comments:
    Rampant edit warring for making unexplained reverts despite warnings.- Ratnahastin (talk) 11:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Superb Owl reported by User:MINQI (Result: Declined)

    [edit]

    Page: Transnational repression (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Superb Owl (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [3]
    2. [4]
    3. [5]
    4. [6]



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [8]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [9]

    Comments:

    At first Superb Owl has removed point from chinese goverment, the news was reported by TDM (Macau), The Paper (newspaper) and Xinhua News Agency, with the reason "these media are state media or not have editorial independence from CCP on political topics", "Chinese goverment's accuse about Transnational repression is not relative to 'Transnational repression'" while he/she/Mx has quoted "News media: State-associated or state-controlled news organisations,…". Later the written about Assange from the resource "Gibbons, Chip - Jacobin" was deleted with the reason "not non-primary source" and "WP:DUE". At last the resolution from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe from the resource RFI was exclused with the reason WP:DUE. In short, none accusation on US can appear under his/her//Mx's watch.MINQI (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    MINQI, as already pointed out on the talk page, the onus to obtain a consensus for inclusion is on you, not the others. Thanks for self-reverting; please keep it removed unless/until an RFC on the article's talk page is closed with consensus for adding the section. A third opinion is not an option anymore as there are already more than two opinions in the discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Aihotz reported by User:Skitash (Result: Declined)

    [edit]

    Page: 1924 retreat from Chefchaoun (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Aihotz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [10]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [11]
    2. [12]
    3. [13]
    4. [14]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [15]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [16]

    Comments:

    Aihotz is persistently removing sourced content without a valid reason. They're insisting on using unsourced WP:OR figures they've introduced while claiming that "we cannot know how many are killed and how many are wounded", despite the fact that the body of the article clearly supports the content they're removing. Skitash (talk) 23:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Aihotz and Skitash, you're both clearly interested in discussing the matter; it's just unclear why that has to happen in edit summaries rather than on the talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined since discussion is taking place; I have suggested they bring in more editors somehow since they're still at loggerheads. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:65.94.47.192 reported by User:Bbb23 (Result: Blocked from article for a month)

    [edit]

    Page: Jonathan Di Bella (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 65.94.47.192 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC) "Jonathan Giovanni Di Bella is an Italian and Canadian Citizen"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 00:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC) to 00:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
      1. 00:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC) "Di Bella is an Italian and Canadian citizen by passport"
      2. 00:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 16:45, 24 November 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Jonathan Di Bella."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    The article was reported at WP:RFPP, but the unsupported edits by the IP are the only disruption, and just as the IP has not violated 3RR (there are more "reverts" by the IP that aren't listed because Twinkle doesn't go back more than 48 hours), there isn't really enough activity to justify protection, so I warned the IP and reverted the IPs. They are insisting that Di Bella is Italian-Canadian, despite the fact that there are no sources that support that mixed nationality. I intend to revert once more after I file this. Bbb23 (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Blocked from the article, for a month, since there are other editors on the IP making apparently constructive edits to unrelated articles. I have also left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:38, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Eds Etd reported by User:Demetrios1993 (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

    [edit]

    Page: Pelagonia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Eds Etd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: 17:49, 24 November 2024

    Diffs of the user's reverts: Eds Etd alone has four reverts; it reaches six if we also count 77.29.61.254, which is obviously them. For example, besides Pelagonia, check the activity of both in Novgorod Republic, hours apart from each other. Assuming I am right, this is a clear violation of WP:LOUTSOCK as well.

    1. 19:33, 24 November 2024
    2. 19:43, 24 November 2024
    3. 20:19, 24 November 2024
    4. 20:30, 24 November 2024 as IP 77.29.61.254
    5. 20:33, 24 November 2024
    6. 20:44, 24 November 2024 as IP 77.29.61.254

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: 21:10, 24 November 2024

    Comments:

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1259390204"