This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Our friend from Athens continues
Maybe it's time for a bunch of page locks. I don't know whether range blocks are possible. Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:0:0:0:ACDF (talk) 00:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Autoblock issue"?
Hi Zzuuzz! As always, it's great to frequently run into you out on the battlefield, and I hope you're doing well! :-)
I had a question about the block that you performed here. You put a summary of "autoblock issue" in this block, and looking at the block itself, it looks like there was an issue or bug with the autoblock feature that we implement, and that you implemented a short block in order to remove, reset, or fix it. Do you remember this event at all? Assuming that I'm correct (probably not...) and that you applied this block as a workaround or fix, I'm interested to know... what happened? What broke? And why does applying this block fix it? I'm just curious and wanted to get some context. ;-)
Oh, and I just wanted to casually point you here really quickly. I'm not sure if you're aware of this or not (most admins aren't), but when you need to rev del a user creation log from public view (usually to redact an abusing username from it), you need to make sure that both the action/target and the performer's username/IP are selected to be redacted for the log to be properly hidden from public view. If you only redact the action/target or the performer's username/IP (and not both), things will appear to be hidden just fine; the UI will output the log as if the abusive username is hidden. However, the log will still be visible in its entirety for anyone who queries the API. Redacting both pieces of the user creation log will hide it from being viewable from the API. This only applies to new account creation logs; the other logs do not have this issue. ;-)
Anyways, get back to me when you're not busy. My question about the block log is not a high priority inquiry at all. :-) Cheers, my friend! ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 14:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Oshwah. It is the type of thing I'd do to clear an autoblock. Maybe you've seen the full CU log around the same time, which provides a clue. I can't remember exactly what happened, but I wouldn't have done it if I didn't have a good reason and it wasn't effective. As to the exact details, and the consequences, they're probably lost in history. But I'm sure it worked out for the good. -- zzuuzz(talk) 14:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zzuuzz - That's good enough for me... I'll check out the CU logs and see if I can't figure out what happened. Thanks for the response! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs) 15:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Adam. It's generally bad form to continue a discussion in an archive - just add anything here. There are two ways to deal with this type of problem: loosen the block you mentioned, or work around it. I think the latter is currently the best option, at least until there has been a wider discussion about all Forcepoint blocks: it prevents abuse from the range (of which there has been some), and it works even when IP addresses vary (which they frequently do). Here's how we work around it:
For users who don't have any Wikipedia account (on any language wiki), they need to create one. This is commonly known as a SUL or global account. If they can't create one on this wiki, then it's usually most possible on metawiki: meta:Special:CreateAccount. This can also usually be done on a mobile, at home, or from a coffee shop.
If for some reason they can't create a global account, and you have their email address, then you can create an account for them. This is easier and best done on this wiki (although it's not necessary and sometimes not possible): Special:CreateAccount. Also take a look at meta:Mass account creation.
For users who have a global account, but can't create a local account on this wiki: I can create one for them.
For users who have a local account but still can't edit, I can grant them block exemption.
This should address any problems you might come up against. You can look up the status of a username at Special:CentralAuth. Work through these points, and at the relevant point, let me know the affected usernames. -- zzuuzz(talk) 10:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, would you grant block exemptions for the following users? They are going to attend an edit-a-thon tomorrow and they will be using the mentioned work VPN. Thank you!
Hi Zzuuzz, I trust you are well? Can you please help provide block exemptions for this trusted user in our community User:Gameli H?
Thank you Robertjamal12~🔔 19:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Zzuuzz. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
[1] thanks, likely to have edited logged out, and likely to return. -- zzuuzz(talk) 17:32, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP Block exemption
Hi Zzuuzz, I trust you are well? Can you please help provide block exemptions for these trusted users in our community Juliet Etefe and Skeptic-enquirer. Thank you Robertjamal12~🔔 18:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Zzuuzz, Can you please help provide block exemptions for this trusted user in our community Kwamevaughan -- Robertjamal12~🔔 10:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I get that they state that they're in the Ghana/Nigeria region and affected by these blocks, and that you trust them. I'll grant IPBE for 3 months. At the same time, writing about entrepreneurs and musicians of dubious notability is never a good look, nor is this message about paid editing from Praxidicae. With IPBE, Kwamevaughan should be on their best behaviour. -- zzuuzz(talk) 11:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Zzuuzz, sorry to bother, Can you please help provide block exemptions for this trusted user in our community Osemfo. Thank you in advance -- Robertjamal12~🔔 08:45, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t believe it’s a webhost? The IP 208.87.232.0/21. I would appreciate a block exemption, thanks. Trillfendi (talk) 17:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Trillfendi: You now have six months IPBE, if it needs renewing ask again. Have a read of the policy. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 18:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tamzin talk page
Hello! I noticed you blocked this editor, but this diff I think needs to be deleted from page history. Is this something you can help with? Thanks! SPF121188(talk this way)(contribs) 17:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Spf121188: is there nothing else wikipedia does about this? like... CheckUser their IP address and turn the comment over to local authorities? That wasn't hate mail, it was a death threat. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 17:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, the more reports sent to T&S the better. The authorities and the relevant ISP(s) are well capable of taking action here. -- zzuuzz(talk) 18:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is good to know; I haven't seen a comment quite like that before, so that's good information. Thanks! SPF121188(talk this way)(contribs) 18:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
theleekycauldron, good call, this particular situation definitely warranted it. BTW, I have to tell you I'm also a huge fan of Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Had to say it! SPF121188(talk this way)(contribs) 18:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Zzuuzz. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Wellertalk 11:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Under “Wallkill Valley Railroad” article, please scroll down to last photo and change last word of (bridge) text to “Railroad”. Thank you. 174.212.99.253 (talk) 23:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disruptive IP (CU) have returned after block expired Sockpuppet Master Gala1900
Hello Zzuuzz, seems a IP with several past blocks for Sockpupetry have returned to his disruptive behaviour. here. The IP user keeps reverting and disrupting, and is a IP of Sock Gala1900. First detected and blocked on 27 Sep 2020, and again on 31 April 2021Mr.User200 (talk) 00:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question
Not sure how this would work, given the 'evidence' is on another Wiki project by an IP user, but I received this message, obviously related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12 (FTR- the IP's range is already blocked here by yourself at 2600:1700:8FC0:8C30:0:0:0:0/64). The account name had created an ANI thread- WP:ANI#Concerns about edits at NickRewind. What should be done regarding this?... (Another FTR- the other user reported in the ANI has been engaged in many edit wars and has been endlessly combative with other users, as discussed through the thread. Hope that if this is indeed a sock that created the thread, that it doesn't end the discussion on another technicality, as many users continue having issues with the reported user). Thanks in advance. Magitroopa (talk) 19:53, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Simulation12 is known for claiming accounts that are not theirs, and I refer you to this. That's not to say that it isn't their account, just that I'm not seeing it. I'll continue taking a look at the relevant topic areas and see if I can find how their interest got piqued. -- zzuuzz(talk) 20:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This may or not be related to this, but my User page is now being blank attacked by User:Fstldy. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, indeed. I'm currently inclined to let the autoblock do its work (opinions may vary). -- zzuuzz(talk) 21:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP unblock for edit-a-thon
Hi zzuuzz, I will lead an editing training for health researchers on 9 June and I would like to ask for IP unblocks to make sure we don't run into any problems. Apologies for being last minute. Here is the list of users:
Hello zzuuzz,
I'm a new user here and I have some very sensitive information that I wish to discuss with you concerning a Sockpuppet investigation you contributed to.
I'm a little lost here, I don't know how to contact you privately. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ----SirOliverQueen SirOliverQueen (talk) 15:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello SirOliverQueen. I'm going to reply (in very general terms) here, with as much detail as you'd have got by email. Policy prevents me discussing that, as does my cynical nature. If you're going to use a throwaway account and a throwaway email address in order to remain enigmatic about an obscure process, then I'm sure you'll understand if I'm not going to disclose much either. -- zzuuzz(talk) 14:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello zzuuzz,
I understand. Thank you for taking the time to reply to me. Nonetheless, I do hope that my enigmatic information could be useful to you in some way.
All the best,
--SirOliverQueen SirOliverQueen (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You've got mail
Hello, Zzuuzz. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Wellertalk 11:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP unblock
Hi,
Could you please provide an IP unblock for the following account? Thank you.
Hello, Zzuuzz. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I was starting to suggest that you revdel 165.76.130.143 's edits, but you beat me to it; thanks for all your hard work! Adakiko (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz There is an error on this page Bujar Osmani I mentioned the error on the talk page can you please fix it 77.29.76.48 (talk) 20:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Zzuuzz, I have a Wikipedia and Wikidata training workshop on Thursday 4 August 2022. Please help provide block exemptions for the following usernames to ensure a smooth programme.
Hi zzuuzz, just in case you missed it, I created a new topic for my second request. The workshop begins tomorrow, I hope you find the time to work on these as soon as you can. I apologise for my timing. Best regards. Kinvidia (talk) 21:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much zzuuzz, please the list below are also new users that will be participating in our workshop. Please help provide block exemptions for them as well.
Hi, I'm running two edit-a-thons on the 17th and 25th for health researchers. Could you please provide IP block exemptions for the following accounts so that we won't run into any issues? I will probably have a second batch of names tomorrow. Thank you very much!
So, what on earth was going on there? I saw the edits earlier, but it seemed innocuous enough, until "Y'all got Gwillhickered" showed up. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, a bit of impersonationuppetry. Tamzin seems to think this is Awolf58, but I'm just starting out on this journey. -- zzuuzz(talk) 08:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Should I see something similar, should I file a quick checkuser? Or how would it be quickest to deal with this sort of thing? Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 08:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely. I'm slowly trying to pick it apart, but feel free to revert at your leisure. I've deleted user pages to make things easier to identify. Impersonation like that can go straight to AIV, or to the aforementioned SPI, and/or just ping a CU. -- zzuuzz(talk) 08:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean the two I blocked for impersonating/harassing Randy Kryn, see Special:PageHistory/James Bevel and my discussion with Awolf/Mrbeastmodeallday at User talk:Awolf58 § Note for Tamzin, where he didn't deny that that was him. He seems to randomly fixate on someone for a bit. Was CactiStaccingCrane for a while, with some pretty elaborate impersonation trying to make it look like CSC was meatpuppeting. Then imitated Lilach5 well enough that they were mistakenly sockblocked. Now back to Randy, it seems. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 08:38, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also note, CU-wise, that Awolf tends to geolocate all over the San Francisco Bay Area, using random WiFi hotspots to edit. I believe he's based in Sacramento, unless he's moved since his days loutsocking as Special:Contribs/2601:204:C300:4FA5::/64. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 08:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Really appreciate you fixing the erroneous block. Editing Wikipedia keeps me sane while I do household chores all day! jengod (talk) 18:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Barnstar
The Special Barnstar
For your great advice to use a gadget to check user profiles, providing a better experience in editing, when other administrators would just lambast me. Thanks! Thinker78(talk) 17:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP Block exemptions for Participants
Hi Zzuuzz, I trust you are well?. A colleague and trusted user Owula kpakpo is organizing an event for new participants at the British Council Ghana. Please help provide block exemptions for the following usernames to ensure a smooth programme. Find the event dashboard here. Thank you
Thanks so much Zzuuzz for making our account creation easier 45.222.192.242 (talk) 16:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Be sure to thank your colleague who helped facilitate it. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP unblock
Hi,
I have someone whom you granted an exemption but after moving to another place he again got the message of his IP being blocked. Could you have a look at it? Thank you.
Hi Zzuuzz, I trust you are well?. We are currenlty organizing an event for new participants at the. Please help provide block exemptions for the following usernames to ensure a smooth programme. Find the event dashboard here.Thank you
Hi. I am Wikiwow1102 and I have made a little over 330 edits, I have been here for 25 or so days. Yes I am a bit new but if you check my Contributions you will see that I fight vandalism everyday. Sometimes I manually revert and others I use Undo. I have dealt with vandalism and would really like access to rollback. Wikiwow*_*Wikiwow*_* (talk) 16:37, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Wikiwow1102. You do seem to have a pretty good record of accuracy when it comes to reverting. I currently count around 50 reverts in the space of about one week. I think I'm going to want a bit more data. Don't let this put you off reminding me in a couple of weeks or asking someone else. -- zzuuzz(talk) 03:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I am checking back to see if I can get rollback access. Wikiwow*_* (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disable TPA
Could you disable the TPA of Beanroot (and probably any other alt this guy creates)? I'm getting a little tired of this dumb harrassment. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because of this moron I have to disable my ping notifications so I can just ignore the harassment. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're literally faster than my notifications. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
L+Ratio+IPeedYourPants
Their proposed new username seems OK, and I didn't find their edits problematic. How do you feel about unblocking? Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Sure, no problem. I was expecting them to just start again, but if they want to change name it's fine by me. -- zzuuzz(talk) 07:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
quick check
So I've never filed a quick check before. Was that the right thing or wrong? - UtherSRG(talk) 23:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Don't think I was complaining, us CUs just sometimes act efficiently, especially in the 'quick' section. It got them blocked, and probably checkusered, so that bit worked. However it's an unusual application of the page. If they're a vandal, they can go to AIV. If they're a sockpuppet of someone in particular, they can go to SPI under that someone's case name. In this particular case, I wouldn't say the sockmaster is of any interest, and frankly wouldn't know where to put them anyway. I think I would have used AIV. -- zzuuzz(talk) 23:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weels was a pervasive vandal back in the day, often attacking with multiple socks at once. Seeing the name, I thought it might have been starting again. - UtherSRG(talk) 00:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know where you're coming from. Willy on Wheels disappeared a very long time ago, and we are left with a legacy of imposters, fanboys and wannabes. This isn't Willy. It's never Willy. -- zzuuzz(talk) 00:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi zzuuzz. Self-confessed sockpuppet of Billy Fiddle/sockfarm [2]. --05:35, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Update. He got blocked a short time after I reported it. He'll be back I'm sure. His sort never stay away long. Thanks. --Coldtrack (talk) 06:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again Zzuuzz. I'll continue this thread for simplicity. Putting "Evlekis" aside for one moment until more is known, I intend to revert this person's every contribution per BMB. As your summary reads "LTA", I believe it is reasonable to assume that the community recognises this to be a non-first time editor. That said, without tags, would it be reasonable for me to cite in the summary that I am reverting the Billy Fiddle/Justice 4 all people/Smart Tricksta little sock farm? I merely aim to avoid looking like I am edit-warring and the last thing I wish to do is get something wrong. Thanks. --Coldtrack (talk) 19:08, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again Coldtrack. Yes this is the person we (currently) call Evlekis, as I do, and it's a long term thing and they're definitely banned. I would advise caution when reverting Evlekis. Here they are reverting vandalism. Other times they can usually be seen reverting other accounts of theirs, so you'd still end up with one of their edits. So a blanket revert is something I wouldn't recommend. Reverting to your own versions, however, has my full endorsement. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Zzuuzz!! Both for confirming my suspicion, and for the endorsement. For the record, I would have checked every edit anyhow and naturally it was my own bunch (you know, the "Russia bot?" lol) that I was most concerned about. I gather you interrupted a spree in actual time. Well that deserved another plaudit, because left for hours, god knows how long it would have taken me to finish the job. :) --Coldtrack (talk) 19:33, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PS. I am aware that rules can overlap. BMB allows any revert of a banned person. GHBH implies a banned editor can make constructive and nonconstructive contributions, and if the latter means removing degrading comments aimed at editors or BLP gross violations, then the BMB argument can easily become a WP:GAME breach. I mean if I were an admin, I'll never allow BMB to pass if it looks like gaming the system. Cheers. --Coldtrack (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP block exemption
Hi, Could you please provide IP block exemption for the following person? Thank you as always.
You blocked this user, but recent edits here draw attention to this new account (which should be blocked on name alone). - wolf 23:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...annnd nevermind. Thanks anyway - wolf 23:11, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock request by another user
This isn't an adaquate unblock request, right? Sarrail(talk) 19:42, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's correct. Someone will probably be along shortly to deal with it. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:46, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I wonder if you'd be willing to close the above – see top of her page – and edit that page accordingly? I'm involved in that discussion and can't do so myself.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liz_Truss
Thank you, Billsmith60 (talk) 15:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I get the simple ones eh? I could probably close that, but it probably won't be before next week. We do have a page, btw, at Wikipedia:Closure requests. -- zzuuzz(talk) 09:07, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where do you find the ip ranges
Question where do you find the ip ranges that are proxies? Which service do you use?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Uni3993 (talk • contribs)
Hello Uni3993. It kinda depends. Most IP ranges that I block as proxies have been found because they have edited abusively. A WHOIS lookup will often give you the range, and a bit of experience along with the contributions here, will tell you how much they're used as proxies. Some IPs, such as Amazon EC2 are publicised on their website. Other IPs belonging to specific providers can be found through ASN. There are some services, such as Spur and MaxMind, which can be used. They're better for individual IPs rather than ranges. -- zzuuzz(talk) 18:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP Block exemptions
Please help provide block exemptions for the following editors in our community.
Hi, I am here to request for rollback rights. I have been contributing to Wikipedia for almost 5 months, and have made more than 2800 contributions. I have started fighting vandalism since late October, and has been actively patrolling RC and fight vandalism frequently using Twinkle. I believe I am already very familiar with fighting vandalism, as I have reported a dozen users in WP:AIAV, aware of the WP:3RR (I have warned editors of edit warring and also never violated that myself), and I have also been granted Pending Changes Reviewer rights for 12 days. Rollback can definitely help me to do even more.
I am also here to request for rollback rights for the use of Huggle. I learnt about Huggle a month ago, and I really want it for efficient anti-vandalism work. However, I cannot do anything in Huggle without rollback rights. Therefore, please kindly grant me rollback rights so that I can use Huggle to fight against vandalism even more easily and efficiently. Thanks a lot! Timothytyy (talk) 03:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP block exemption
Hi, Could you please provide IP block exemption for the following people? Thanks.
ItsMeKeys has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
I see you've gone ahead with what we agreed. I've posted a message to the editor on UTRS telling them that they should be good to go. Thanks. JBW (talk) 22:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
4x new Evlekis socks for Zzuzz and their CU TPS's
Start by reading my comment about Evlekis's new MO further up on this page, then
for these two check their edits (multiple test like edits to undo one edit of mine, without triggering edit filters):
Thanks, good blocks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is that for real? No calling Thomas.W and others (including me) offensive names?! :))) --Coldtrack (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzuuzz. You may have missed one of the fake "Evlekis" accounts. I typed one of the names into the contribution search and encountered this option. He (or she) made one edit which has been deleted. More than likely the creation of something offensive and no doubt targetted one of a handful of people. The creation of the "unblocked" account is five minutes or so before the batch of edits from the "blocked" account. --Coldtrack (talk) 19:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It would suggest impersonation and trolling, which is a thing LTAs often do. Here is not so clear, but I'll assume so. Also, pro-tip: [3]. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah thanks Zzuuzz. --Coldtrack (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No Coldtrack, you did not type one of the accounts I listed into the contributions search, but a completely different account (check the spelling: "teh" in the middle of the user name I listed above, and "the" in the middle of the user name of the account you checked; which may or may not be related to the ones I listed, no matter which they're probably not up to anything good since recycling old names is typical for bad guys...). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 20:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PS. The comment after this one from Zzuuzz clarifies what I might have told you if I noticed your edit. I was well aware that I was talking about a separate account. My assumption was (and still is) that it was all created by the same person based on the timing and the obvious offensive behaviour of the initially unnoticed account. You named four accounts, and as such, all were blocked. But no sleeper check is reported to have followed which is why I was given to believe that Mr "Commie Cakes"/"Brownfingers" etc. likely created the "the" variation as well. --Coldtrack (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a general observation, if you're talking to a checkuser about socks, chances are they've already run a sleeper check and haven't told you they've run a sleeper check. I still think it's just a noob, until proven otherwise. Still, I appreciate the pointer. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the thing though. If you go to Special:Contributions and start typing 'Mooooosa' in the username field, you get both accounts. The 'the' account was created first, then it edited. Three minutes later, Evlekis created the 'teh' account then edited the same page. This smells of trolling, with the first account being just a noob. -- zzuuzz(talk) 20:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Except it sure wasn't the Evlekis who edited pre-2013. I'd personally take a gamble that the sockpuppets reported were UK based and editing from the network and IP range that was used previously by Billy Fiddle et al. --Coldtrack (talk) 23:16, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fuccbois
Novel type of vandalism. Mind you it's possibly flushing out a nest of socks. Nthep (talk) 18:39, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's some weird people out there. Also, 'K..' is probably next: [4]. -- zzuuzz(talk) 18:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
worth a CU sweep? Nthep (talk) 19:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They're hopping proxies and browsers, and it's a bit impractical. Worth noting the link, however. -- zzuuzz(talk) 19:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa. Now the talk page is clogged 'n cluttered with numerous sock posts. And, it's in the middle of a DYK. Good thing they're blocked and some, tagged. Though if they rise again... Sarrail(talk) 02:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hey dude, thanks for telling me how you are investigating my account set!
Next time I will make sure to just randomize the name order (my bad, I should of done that earlier in my .py script) and add anti-detect features to the browser engine. It's all not on Javascript btw, so traditional fingerprinting will not work, unless you are somehow a sysadmin of Wikimedia you will not be able to see what they are coming from, and what browser. Turning Red is probably the worst thing ever and I want the creator(s) of it charged for money laundering. 150 million for a mediocre film is a crime. 77.23.182.38 (talk) 23:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well you're not going to achieve that by wasting your time here, eh. -- zzuuzz(talk) 23:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are violating WP:DENY by replying to these comments, and encouraging me to "abuse" the site more by "wasting my time". Turning Red is horrible and the COI on the Fuccboi(s) articles are proof on how deluded you scholarstorians are. I have botnet IPs btw, so a rangeban will not get rid of me, in fact it will hurtt regular people more. 31.18.112.249 (talk) 00:04, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You're one of those easily encouraged people, eh. And you want to hurtt people, eh. I see. -- zzuuzz(talk) 00:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, Zzuuzz, that must be the sad person who messed up my pretty articles. Kinda Trumpian, huh, "I want the creator sued cause I don't like it". Is this the generation we raised, Zzuuzz, or can we just blame video games? Who cries about a movie like this? Drmies (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you can tell this is someone without love in their life. Without much concept of real life, really. They won't find them here. Their problems are their own and no one here is going to give a shit. Could it be that some people just don't assume personal responsibility? -- zzuuzz(talk) 21:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh dear!
Just a dummy edit to remove that nonsense from my watchlist! BilCat (talk) 02:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See contributions, reverting me without actually reverting the edit I made, referencing, in both name and summaries, edit summaries I've used a few times, and commenting about not yet having been spotted by the edit filters... - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See edits, reverting another edit of mine without actually reverting the edit (now obviously wary of thanking me...) - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
and #4 for today, with the same MO as a couple of previous socks (see further up on this page), make a bunch of thanks for edits I've made, but not making any edits (so check their logs). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:18, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seasons Greetings
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}[reply]
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a MerryChristmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
So am I to be honest. The weather's grim and the wife has work in the morning so I'm on Wikipedia! Sock indef'd, anyway. Happy new year to you both. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:18, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Zzuuzz, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—Moops⋠T⋡ 02:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:35, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
| Thomas.W talk 06:54, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
| Thomas.W talk 18:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
