Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
cu results, marking as checked |
→17 May 2019: cmt, close |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===17 May 2019=== |
===17 May 2019=== |
||
{{SPI case status| |
{{SPI case status|close}} |
||
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
====Suspected sockpuppets==== |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
* As in the previous report, Ionel05 appears to be an {{unrelated}} victim of a [[joe job]]. —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 01:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC) |
* As in the previous report, Ionel05 appears to be an {{unrelated}} victim of a [[joe job]]. —[[User:DoRD|DoRD]] ([[User talk:DoRD|talk]]) 01:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC) |
||
*For the record, I wouldn't pay any attention to what those IP addresses are saying. Closing.. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 18:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
Revision as of 18:45, 18 May 2019
Simulation12
- Simulation12 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12/Archive.
Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:
17 May 2019
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Ionel05 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Ionel05 is already indef blocked, but this makes it clear that User:Ionel05 is a self-admitted sock of Simulation12, and I'd like it added to the case file.
Also, probably worth it to check for sleepers... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- As in the previous report, Ionel05 appears to be an Unrelated victim of a joe job. —DoRD (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
- For the record, I wouldn't pay any attention to what those IP addresses are saying. Closing.. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)