User talk:WickedAngry2

Welcome

Note : please do not post messages on here telling me to try this, join that or any of that other stuff WickedAngry2 (talk) 02:01, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 14 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Ulisses page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WickedAngry2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WickedAngry2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE : The Tea House

I posted above not to post those kinds of messages WickedAngry2 (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Account

I already vowed to no longer make any disruptive edits. now I am off to make a new account with a totally different name and I will hide in the shadows to make sure I am not identified as WickedAngry.

If you truly are interested in turning over a new leaf, stating you're going to run off and create a new account is not the way to do it. That indicates that you truly aren't paying attention to the warnings and the reason for the indefinite block. "Indefinite" is not "forever", but if your response to a block is a threat to create another sock, then it might as well be "forever". Another thought would be to review WP:OFFER. --McDoob AU93 13:21, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You Serious ?

WickedAngry2, you were blocked because you already did damage. even if you vow not to do it anymore, doesn't mean it didn't happen in the past. every new account will be blocked indefinitely by the admins ShamuAquariums (talk) 07:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WickedAngry2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have vowed not to make anymore disruptive edits that I did on other accounts in the past so please unblock me so I don't have to make another account WickedAngry2 (talk) 08:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RE : You Serious ?

ShamuAquariums, I will keep making new accounts. this time, on a different computer