User talk:Volcanoman7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Hello71. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so it has been removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ⁓ Hello71 02:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Volcanoman7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Vsmith (talk) 14:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, seems that you should have a welcome note :) I've tweaked your rewrite of adakite a bit, mostly links and wording changes, it's about the rock - not the term. If I've messed up anything please let me know. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 14:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for the changes they look quite nice. I also made a few corrections to my grammar and typos. I also got a message saying that my point of view seems opinionated. I will be happy to alter the article any way that you would like. I tried to state that the idea is still controversial and gave the alternative interpretation. But I will do more if you wish. I did try to stick with the facts -- that is, what an adakite is and when we defined it. I really enjoy Wikipedia and contribute when I can. Let me know if I can help you further.Volcanoman7 (talk) 20:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a couple of graphs from the Nature article. Are those allowed to be put up?Volcanoman7 (talk) 20:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anteaters Club, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Volcanoman7. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Anteaters Club".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anteaters Club}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Adam Worth seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Volcanoman7! You created a thread called name in wikipedia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Volcanoman7. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 01:25, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]