User talk:Thesucessor

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Thesucessor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! MediaJS (talk) (C) 13:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Malu Trevejo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:09, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The source was from an Instagram Live. How am I supposed to provide a reliable source? If you have a way to cite that let me know. Thesucessor (talk) 10:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Young Khalifa moved to draftspace[edit]

I've moved your article Young Khalifa to draftspace. This is because the article currently does not have sufficient reliable sources to remain published. Please make sure to read our guideline on reliable sources. Once your article has sufficient sourcing, feel free to submit it for review, or if you are confident, move it back to its original location. If you have any questions or would like any help, feel free to contact me! Elli (talk | contribs) 16:04, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can I create the page draft with nothing on it please? The fans can fill the information. I want my name to appear in blue and not in red. Thesucessor (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a reliable source? Sorry for my ignorance. I’m new to this platform.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/taylor-gang-ent-llc_as-of-now-john-alfred-vega-rios-aka-young-activity-6798584585383944192-FC9E Thesucessor (talk) 16:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This would be considered a primary source, and therefore not indicative of notability. Primary sources can be used but should generally be avoided - if information is important enough for inclusion, it will usually be covered in a secondary source. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! What are the next steps to submit the page to its original location? Thesucessor (talk) 16:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you're going to need more sources for the page to be accepted as an article. Otherwise, if you move it back, it will likely be deleted. Elli (talk | contribs) 16:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do the music platforms count as reliable sources? Thesucessor (talk) 16:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the link to Young Khalifa first single. https://dashgo.co/7jm0avo

Thesucessor (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I move on the page back to its original location? Thesucessor (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I move a page to its original location when it’s time? Thesucessor (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, the platform alone does not count as significant coverage in a reliable source. What's necessary is biographical coverage of Young Khalifa from a reliable source, such as a news article or a reputable magazine. As for moving the page back, you can click "More", then click "Move" - but I would strongly encourage you to go through the Articles for Creation process instead. Elli (talk | contribs) 22:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to move your draft article, such moves are disruptive. If you haven't read WP:PAID please do so now.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you need to stop adding Young Khalifa's name to articles until there is an accepted draft.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jiggiri Records, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 18:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Bojo1498. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Ñengo Flow, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I see you have also been warned before about adding Young Khalifa's name to articles. bojo | talk 00:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Albert Einstein. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Ñengo Flow[edit]

Good evening! I wanted to bring up the issue of you consistently adding or changing unreferenced information on Ñengo Flow. I appreciate your efforts to improve the page, but it is imperative that you follow Wikipedia's guidelines for properly citing information. Wikipedia is built on verifiable information, and adding information without sources can be problematic, especially on pages about living people (more info here). If you add unsourced information, those additions will be reverted. I hope you can find sources for the information you are adding and continue to improve that and other pages on Wikipedia. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any questions, I'm happy to help however I can! Happy editing! bojo | talk 02:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Taylor Gang Entertainment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 15:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Taylor Gang Entertainment, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 17:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Gang Entertainment. Rob van vee 05:52, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated unsourced additions[edit]

Thesucessor, you seem to be having a hard time understanding WP:VERIFIABILITY and your edit summaries are somewhat incomprehensible. As you have ignored my previous attempts at requesting you to familiarise yourself with that policy, allow me to recite a key sentence: The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, in this case, you. It goes on to say that an inline citation needs to be provided to support the contribution, something you have yet to do. You have repeatedly violated this policy and are now edit warring over it. This will ultimately result in a case being logged at WP:ANI and your editing privileges being removed for a period of time or indefinitely. I'm not going to violate WP:3RR and at the same time allow you the opportunity to revert or source your edits. If you intend to be a constructive editor at Wikipedia, you'll need to abide by certain policies so I urge you to please make the right decision. Rob van vee 19:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Rob van vee 19:33, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Taylor Gang Entertainment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jayron 32 19:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thesucessor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m adding real information and just because it doesn’t have a source I get blocked? Is it because the page moderator mad or what is this about? Thesucessor (talk) 21:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked primarily for violating WP:EW. Yamla (talk) 22:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand, but Young Deji, RMB Justize and Young Khalifa are part of the rooster, plus there is information on it without being quoted and he doesn’t get any warnings. He started the war since day one. Thesucessor (talk) 13:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Young Khalifa[edit]

Hello, Thesucessor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Young Khalifa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Young Khalifa[edit]

Hello, Thesucessor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Young Khalifa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Young Khalifa[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Young Khalifa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How can someone say what you stated on the speedy deletion? May I need to send a picture with him and the Taylor Gang diamond pendant with proof of purchase from the jewelry shop? I guess you guys don’t know not even a bit from Hip Hop/Rap/Trap/ Drill or music however. Thesucessor (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thesucessor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Deleting my page without even asking me for my taylor gang chain with proofThesucessor (talk) 18:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.