User talk:Theleekycauldron/Archive/2023/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
February songs
 | |
| my daily stories |
My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
The bot you use archived this )and more) just after I posted to the thread, - intentionally so? Just curious. Take care. Will expand my sabbatical Psalm (79) now. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hey, @Gerda Arendt! No idea why it got archived, no – unfortunately, I haven't educated myself on whatever goes on with the infobox disputes, and honestly, I think I'm just about wiped out as-is. Lovely pictures as always :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 06:28, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- Everybody not knowing the infobox disputes is fortunate!!! - Off to a funeral, long trip, see you on Tuesday, read my stories (link below the pic). Today's was such a boring DYK that I didn't put it on my user page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
- today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
theleekycauldron, since this nomination dates back to November, I was hoping you could return to it, since your issues with the nomination are what have stalled it and you haven't replied to the points made by the nominator. Please let me know if you'd like me instead to call for a new reviewer. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Strongly considering posting to WT:DYK, as I'm a little vexed – but I just responded, we'll see if the nominator has some insight I'm missing. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:00, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capri-Sun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of In actu -- In actu (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.
Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.
TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included 
LunaEatsTuna, 
Thebiguglyalien, 
Sammi Brie, 
Trainsandotherthings, 
Lee Vilenski, 
Juxlos, 
Unexpectedlydian, 
SounderBruce, 
Kosack, 
BennyOnTheLoose and 
PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Monthly stat page
Hi, I wanted to ask you if the bot needs a jumpstart on the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics/Monthly DYK pageview leaders. Does not update so far. Thanks. Bruxton (talk) 00:35, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: It takes wikimedia a while to do its daily pageview dumps for the bot to access, so the bot runs once daily at 03:27 UTC. Thanks :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 00:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Capri-Sun you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Capri-Sun and Talk:Capri-Sun/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of In actu -- In actu (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
March stories
 | |
| my women's day story |
today: where I learned opera, + 3 women, in one hook ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:37, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
today a woman, a 2016 DYK remembered of a Czech soprano siging German music in Japan (our conductor was courageous and called her to step in for a concert on short notice, and she was interested! - only had no time that day in 2013. We got Gabriela Eibenová who was also great. Girls and women sang how Bach arranged Pergolesi's Stabat Mater to a new text paraphrasing Psalm 51, last Sunday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
The article Capri-Sun you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Capri-Sun for comments about the article, and Talk:Capri-Sun/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of In actu -- In actu (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Pending DYK nominations with potential quirky hooks indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Thank you for your work on California politicians! Derpytoucan (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC) |
- Happy to dip my feet in that well, Derpytoucan! Strange that I haven't until now, as a California native... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 20:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Dear White Staffers
On 14 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dear White Staffers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two years after Instagram's Dear White Staffers started out as a small meme account, it was credited with kickstarting the unionization of U.S. congressional staff? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dear White Staffers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dear White Staffers), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for all your work, both with content and especially in the (relatively thankless) task of DYK management. It is high quality, and most appreciated. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:15, 10 March 2023 (UTC) |
- What a surprise, Eddie891, thanks so much! :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- I support the barnstar! - someone will have to restore the tick for December nom Alchymic Quartet ;) - today we remember the 150th birthday of Max Reger, who saw the horrors of a world war right when it began in 1914, while others were still in high patriotic moods --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
pshaw
Literally just noticed that PSHAW doesn't show up when you're in the list of hooks awaiiting approval. You are the smartypants! Valereee (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- to be fair to me, it also doesn't show up at WP:DYKNA :) gotta be on a nompage for that to work.
- Come to think of it, that's not the worst idea? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 20:28, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Ugh, that's what I meant, I think. I'd been worrying I might be promoting something that had stalled out before being approved. Valereee (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Kai Shappley
Hello, Theleekycauldron. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kai Shappley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)