User talk:Thanawat200807

November 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Corrin (Fire Emblem) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Corrin (Fire Emblem) was changed by Thanawat200807 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925116 on 2023-11-10T03:05:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Koninklijke Philips[edit]

A tag has been placed on Koninklijke Philips requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntiDionysius (talk) 02:35, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 14:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As info, Bbb23. I haven't cleaned up any of the mess. -- ferret (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: Thanks for the heads up. I did some clean-up, e.g., G5s and rollbacks.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thanawat200807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accidentally blocked for moving Hyundai page Thanawat200807 (talk) 14:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request 2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thanawat200807 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. I understand that I have caused sockpuppetry on Wikipedia.

2. I’ll try to not cause sockpuppetry and damage to the Wikipedia articles to avoided being blocked again because I don’t want to see that feeling of me being the bad guy on this wiki. To avoid this I’ll try not to move pages by mistake and leave them as is.

3. I will try to make as much useful contributions into the wiki’s instead.

4. I should know that this block isn’t always necessary for no sockpuppetry and damage to the articles in general.

Hopefully, I will be unblocked soon but only time will tell.. Thanawat200807 (talk) 14:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Time has told. The block is correct. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:37, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To match the block on your original account:

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.