User talk:TYSK
Welcome[edit]
|
New Wikiproject![edit]
Hello, TYSK! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 18:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
August 2019[edit]
Hello TYSK. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Shoelace (social network), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TYSK. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TYSK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Although you may just be a fan of Google products, recently you've been making edits to various Google-related articles using sometimes WP:PEACOCKy language, I thought it might be helpful to remind you that if you are editing against compensation or consideration, or for an employer, disclosure is required. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 18:18, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Salvidrim. It would be very great if I would be paid by Google for my work. But in fact, as you say, I'm just a Google fan. You've hit the bull's eye.
- I work in the German Wikipedia mostly purposefully on topics, sometimes politics, sometimes a band I like and at the moment I'm on a Google trip. If I write wrong or beautified, then this can be changed with pleasure. But actually I always try to write fact-based and neutral.
- I find it very funny that my current "Google fetishism" has been discovered.^^ I dont receiving or expect to receive compensation for my edits.--TYSK (talk) 18:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Google Domains edits...[edit]
Please DO NOT remove/replace properly referenced and valid reference links with non-english reference links. If you'd like to add non-english references please do so as a separate < ref> </ ref>. Also please refer to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for information about adding and using trivia and trivial information in a Wikipedia article. Thank you for your cooperation. YborCityJohn (talk) 03:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hello YborCityJohn,
- I have only removed the sources because they are no longer up to date. It makes no sense to keep outdated sources in an article that refer to something that is no longer true. If you have read my additions carefully, you will have noticed that there is new information available. I have also structured this small article. Up to now it consisted of only one long text. My change created overview. Please read changes carefully in the future and DO NOT delete up-to-date information.--TYSK (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if the information is out of date the references HAVE to stay as is if they are still active, If the the links are dead you need to add a [dead link] to the reference and/or go to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine and add an archived version but if the reference is active DO NOT remove it especially with a non-english links on ENGLISH Wikipedia (The key word here is English Wikipedia). Therefore I am reverting back your references. Thank you for your cooperation. YborCityJohn (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- I am referring this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring because you are the one edit warring. YborCityJohn (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- You are aware that the article was no longer up to date and I brought it up to date, so new sources were needed. The old sources would not have been related to the new information.--TYSK (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- User:TYSK And what part of ENGLISH references on English Wikipedia are you not getting? Seriously the rules basically say that on Wikipedia English references have to be done in English just as on German Wikipedia references have to be in German and so on... so putting German reference links in English Wikipedia is not appropriate and if you had followed what I said before we would be where we are right now. Those German references NEED to be removed and the English ones put back, also I would like to refer you to Wikipedia:Citing sources. YborCityJohn (talk) 16:37, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- You are aware that the article was no longer up to date and I brought it up to date, so new sources were needed. The old sources would not have been related to the new information.--TYSK (talk) 16:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- I am referring this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring because you are the one edit warring. YborCityJohn (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter if the information is out of date the references HAVE to stay as is if they are still active, If the the links are dead you need to add a [dead link] to the reference and/or go to the Internet Archive Wayback Machine and add an archived version but if the reference is active DO NOT remove it especially with a non-english links on ENGLISH Wikipedia (The key word here is English Wikipedia). Therefore I am reverting back your references. Thank you for your cooperation. YborCityJohn (talk) 15:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Speedy deletion nomination of Shoelace (social network)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shoelace (social network) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, TYSK
Thank you for creating Shoelace (social network).
User:Barkeep49, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I have done as you suggested and restored your version without copyright. I also don't think this topic is notable (at this point) and think it should redirect to Area 120 but will leave that to another reviewer to consider. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barkeep49}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello, TYSK
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Shoelace (social network), for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click the button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 14:25, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |