User talk:Soul Crusher/Archive 1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Soul Crusher/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! dbtfz ^talk 04:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC) P.S. I don't suppose your username is a reference to "Crush My Soul" by Godflesh?[reply]

Hah, that's funny I had never even considered that. In 2006 I had absolutely no idea who Godflesh were. Now Godflesh are one of my favorite bands and I'm a big fan of "Crush My Soul" and its music video. However, my username is and always has been intended as a reference to White Zombie's debut album.--Soul Crusher (talk) 08:59, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from The Cows[edit]

Hello Soul Crusher, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to The Cows has been removed. It was removed by Snigbrook with the following edit summary '(remove prod - sources can be found, probably enough for notability guidelines WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC #5)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Snigbrook before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Type (song)[edit]

The article Type (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't pass notability requirement for songs: hasn't been ranked on national or significant music charts, won significant awards or honors or been performed independently by several notable artists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Clubmarx (talk) 18:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you added the charting on this. I don't appreciate your attitude though. Clubmarx (talk) 00:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice...[edit]

...work on Operation: Mindcrime. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Zombie Brick House 2003.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie Brick House 2003.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:00, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Faithnomoreangeldust.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Faithnomoreangeldust.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 05:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:TAD albums[edit]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Piero Scaruffi[edit]

Please note from the following discussions: [1], [2], [3], that the consensus at this time is that Scaruffi should not be cited as a reviewer. You're welcome to open another discussion at WP:ALBUM and see if you can change consensus, but please don't keep adding him to articles or reverting when he is deleted. Radiopathy •talk• 03:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know... It's REALLY tempting just to continuing fixing what you guys erase. Give me some time to think about it.--Soul Crusher (talk) 06:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New York[edit]

In regards to this edit, the actual name of the place is New York, not New York City. My edit is correct. Radiopathy •talk• 03:25, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, alright Mr. Serious. New York City doesn't register as a place in your book? Fine. But I was referring to the edit you made that deleted part of the info-box and messed up the album segment. I don't know what you would call it, but one of the "|"s in the review section.--Soul Crusher (talk) 06:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of To Hell 'n' Back[edit]

I have nominated To Hell 'n' Back, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Hell 'n' Back. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:05, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! Guess I'd better work on it some, eh?--Soul Crusher (talk) 22:50, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you guys work fast. Either that or I'm just really, really slow...--Soul Crusher (talk) 09:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silent Explosion[edit]

The article Silent Explosion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of inheritance through founding band.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 16:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:GOD albums[edit]

Category:GOD albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Queensryche Best I Can.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Queensryche Best I Can.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie Pig Heaven Cover 1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie Pig Heaven Cover 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbone Modern Industry.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbone Modern Industry.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbone Unyielding Conditions.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbone Unyielding Conditions.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbone Fight the Youth.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbone Fight the Youth.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbone Alcoholic.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbone Alcoholic.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbone When Problems Arise.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbone When Problems Arise.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fishbone Servitude.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fishbone Servitude.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gruntruck Above Me.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gruntruck Above Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie The One.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie The One.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie El Phantasmo and the Chicken-Run Blast-O-Rama.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie El Phantasmo and the Chicken-Run Blast-O-Rama.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie Blood Milk And Sky.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie Blood Milk And Sky.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie I Am Hell.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie I Am Hell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie Real Solution 9.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie Real Solution 9.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:White Zombie Feed The Gods.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:White Zombie Feed The Gods.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Queensryche Take Hold of the Flame.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Queensryche Take Hold of the Flame.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Queensryche Revolution Calling.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Queensryche Revolution Calling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Queensryche Breaking the Silence.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Queensryche Breaking the Silence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Queensryche Walk in the Shadows.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Queensryche Walk in the Shadows.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Zombie American Witch 2.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie American Witch 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Witch for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article American Witch, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Witch until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. œ ^™ 17:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grotus Mother of Pearl.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grotus Mother of Pearl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyuss Thong Song.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kyuss Thong Song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grotus Hand to Mouth.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grotus Hand to Mouth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyuss Demon Cleaner.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kyuss Demon Cleaner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grotus Edward Abbey.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grotus Edward Abbey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyuss One Inch Man.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kyuss One Inch Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Zombie The Great American Nightmare.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie The Great American Nightmare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Young Gods Lucidogen.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Young Gods Lucidogen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chris Cornell Flutter Girl.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chris Cornell Flutter Girl.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chris Cornell Preaching the End of the World.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chris Cornell Preaching the End of the World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Zombie Scum of the Earth.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie Scum of the Earth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Witchfinder General Music.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Witchfinder General Music.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Young Gods Envoye.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Young Gods Envoye.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Young Gods Gasoline Man.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Young Gods Gasoline Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Young Gods Longue Route.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Young Gods Longue Route.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kings X Its Over My Head.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kings X Its Over My Head.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Rob Zombie for deletion[edit]

The article 20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Rob Zombie is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Rob Zombie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JJ98 (Talk) 00:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Zombie Best Of.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie Best Of.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rob Zombie Best Of.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie Best Of.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Barkmarket Vegas Throat.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Barkmarket Vegas Throat.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Charlie Ondras (Unsane).jpeg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Charlie Ondras (Unsane).jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hand to Mouth (Grotus song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hand to Mouth (Grotus song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hand to Mouth (Grotus song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Aspects (talk) 18:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Grotus Hand to Mouth.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grotus Hand to Mouth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Vampire Rodents members[edit]

Category:Vampire Rodents members, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Soul Crusher! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pussy Galore - Sugarshit Sharp.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pussy Galore - Sugarshit Sharp.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gloryhole page[edit]

Hi. Would you have some objection to either moving this to Gloryhole (album) with a link from the Glory hole disambiguation page and restoring the redirect the album page was substituted for, or my doing so? The word does have multiple meanings (see, for instance, Glory hole (sexual slang) for the alternative spelling Gloryhole for that particular usage). BTW, the lead line of the article mentionsł "Love Poke Here" as the album's name, not "Gloryhole" - I'm guessing this is a typo? Thanks! Allens (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done. Thanks for bring this up!--Soul Crusher (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I've done the disambiguation page (adding the album) and redirect (to the disambig page; moving a page automatically creates one from the old page name to the new page name) changes. Allens (talk) 06:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Von Lmo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Von Lmo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Cycle Is Complete, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Organ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rob Zombie Feel So Numb.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rob Zombie Feel So Numb.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Comes Marching Home[edit]

Thanks for creating this! Long overdue!--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, my pleasure!--Soul Crusher (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Peter Stampfel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Violinist and Bongwater

Soldier-Talk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rough Trade and The Fall

God Bless the Red Krayola and All Who Sail With It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Instruments

Kangaroo? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Instruments

Live 1967 (Red Krayola album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Fahey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Julian Cope - Sunshine Playroom.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Julian Cope - Sunshine Playroom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 19:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jay Yuenger[edit]

The article Jay Yuenger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP - Created before BLPPROD so using standard PROD

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. No unique names 13:59, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Surviving You, Always, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Redondo Beach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Eleventh-Hour Shine-On, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Last Great Challenge in a Dull World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mute Records discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shine (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rhythm & Noise[edit]

Template:Rhythm & Noise has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strange Things, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Von Lmo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Von Lmo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:19, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Living Colour Funny Vibe.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Living Colour Funny Vibe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Daniel Vahnke.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Vahnke.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pegboy[edit]

Thank you for adding all of those Pegboy records to Wiki, much appreciated. Robman94 (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Basic (Robert Quine and Fred Maher album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New Wave

Escape (Jody Harris and Robert Quine album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New Wave

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swans[edit]

Nice work on expanding the articles, esp. the ones listed at AfD. Thanks! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 09:56, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mundus Subterraneus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Montreuil, France

Tycho Brahe (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Montreuil, France

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cop Shoot Cop PieceMan.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cop Shoot Cop PieceMan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Beautiful People Ltd[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Beautiful People Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. noq (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

Your recent edits to Ten (Pearl Jam album), The Downward Spiral, and The Fragile (Nine Inch Nails album) were reverted. There is a 10 revscore max for the ratings template, and the notability of the review source should be considered (MOS:ALBUM#Critical reception). Using Piero Scaruffi (whose work in music criticism comprises a self-published website and self-published books) as a source for music reviews would be appropriate when the topic is lacking in notability and coverage by more reputed sources. We should try to research the most reliable sources available on the topic (WP:STICKTOSOURCES), and Scaruffi's review site is not one of them for the aforementioned articles. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doldrums (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Calling Over Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jim O'Rourke

Destroy All Music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jim O'Rourke

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beautiful People Ltd for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beautiful People Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful People Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:22, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chrome Box for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chrome Box is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrome Box until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley 10:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The Emotional Plague .jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Emotional Plague .jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rob Zombie Never Gonna Stop.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rob Zombie Never Gonna Stop.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three Rooms Press[edit]

I am a new wikipedia contributor and need help with article on Three Room Press now being considered for delete. [4] Please review Three Rooms Press, make constructive suggestions, and add your comment to the articles for delete talk page. Thank you. GetDaFacts (talk) 15:47, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Beautiful People Ltd - Beautiful People Ltd.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Beautiful People Ltd - Beautiful People Ltd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stu Spasm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Babes in Toyland and Psychedelicatessen

GOD (British band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to My Bloody Valentine

Shannon Selberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Treehouse Records

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Piero Scaruffi[edit]

Why are the online opinions of Piero Scaruffi worthy of listing in boxes of "professional ratings" in the reviews box for Kinks albums? He's just a guy (albeit a smart, educated one) with an opinion; there are a zillion of those online. I'd like to remove him from all the Kinks album boxes, unless you have a convincing argument I am missing - DavidWBrooks (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the professional ratings box has reached its maximum capacity (ten reviews), then I can can understand replacing or removing his review. If not, then having it there might prove beneficial to interested readers of the article. Especially if that article is sparse in critical assessments. There is no point in removing his Scaruffi's review unless you are going to trump it with another.--Soul Crusher (talk) 20:59, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer David's question, but I can answer it for you. I did some digging around and it turns out Piero Scaruffi is notable (New York Times article). So I'm happy for his reviews to stay, unless the guys at WikiProject Albums know different. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums#Piero Scaruffi reviews (again). Can I politely ask you now stop adding the Scaruffi reviews just for the minute, and contribute to the discussion in that thread, until a consensus is reached? Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If consensus is reached that these references are OK, you may want to add |authorlink=Piero Scaruffi to them for those people unfamiliar with this reviewer. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 16:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you're adding references to the articles, especially to those that are unreferenced. When doing so, could you please add {{reflist}} to the articles so the references will display properly? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed two of these links to "reviews" before discovering this discussion. The information in the "review" was so seemingly insignificant that I just removed the link. No I see this is part of a larger issue and I'll wander over to the other discussion. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a look at the other sections on this talk page shows that this issue has been discussed before and also seem to reveal that you don't really have a very good idea of what editing wikipedia is about. Carptrash (talk) 18:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Stop and seek consensus" doesn't mean "Wait a day or two and then carry on as you were", particularly if another editor turns up and claims your fresh set of changes to Black Sabbath articles were questionable. You're starting to be disruptive. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 05:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only saw that you wished me to take part in the discussion. It wasn't my intention to be disruptive, I'll stop editing now.--Soul Crusher (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. Go with your suggestion of pulling out direct quotes from Scaruffi into articles, particularly those that haven't got much coverage. Just do a couple in a morning - not hundreds! Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:53, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you're spamming his reviews once again. Was there a consensus that this is okay? Can you link me to it? Sergecross73 msg me 05:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understood from the discussion found here that the consensus was that his reviews are allowed in the review box as long as there is room (limited to ten).--Soul Crusher (talk) 05:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, I don't know. That looks largely undecided. One person said that, but others didn't really agree. (Another said "only use PS if here's literally no other reviews", for instance. Sergecross73 msg me 06:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The respondents were trying to determine the quantity of reviews in the review-box that would constitute "many". There was was the suggestion of "when there is nothing else" and also "between five and ten." But nothing about him being excluded altogether.--Soul Crusher (talk) 06:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are we reading the same conversation? I see multiple editors fully against its use early on in the discussion. It doesn't appear like any 2 people really agreed on how to handle it, really. I think I'm going to start up another discussion on this... Sergecross73 msg me 20:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sergecross, Regarding Piero Scaruffi, a wp:consensus was reached by several users in a long discussion herethat he was not "a professional" critic. He has even created his own publishing edition "omniware" which only publishes his own books, see Tower.com source here and here on book-info.com . Plus, his publication was never cited by any serious critics. Soul Crusher has been editing for months, tons of reviews with only "piero Scarruffi". Some might think he is a relative of Scaruffi. Such dedication is suspicious. Woovee (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Dragon (Vangelis album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

is achieved through harmony and chaotic carnival, which builds an atmosphere of mystery and fear.")<ref name="scaruffireview"/> Retrieved February 13th, 2011</ref> Other reviews have been mixed, but

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amsterdam (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oxbow (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|''[[Balls in the Great Meat Grinder Collection]]]'' CD (compiles the albums ''King of the Jews'' and ''Fuckfest'' on a single cd, in that order)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:14, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Solarized may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

url=http://www.popmatters.com/music/reviews/b/brownian-solarized.shtml |title=Ian Brown: Solarized < PopMatters |publisher=Popmatters.com |accessdate=10 March 2012}}</ref>
| rev4score = 3/10)<ref name="scaruffireview">{{cite web |first=Piero |last=Scaruffi |url=http://www.scaruffi.com/vol6/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The World Is Yours (Ian Brown album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| rev6score = 3/10)<ref name="scaruffireview">{{cite web |first=Piero |last=Scaruffi |url=http://www.scaruffi.com/vol6/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review formatting[edit]

Hi. When adding reviews, there is no need to include parentheses around the numbers. Simply put 6.0/10, not (6.0/10). Thanks. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 22:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note Please use "6/10" not "6.0/10". —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Piero Scaruffi Verdict[edit]

Alright, here's what we're going to do.

I see no clear consensus supporting his use articles/review tables. At best, there's no consensus, at worst, there's consensus against it.

I don't like how this keep getting the community into arguments, so we're going to make a final call on this. A final discussion will be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews

I will make a final call if there is a consensus to support his use in articles or not.

If I deem there to be a consensus supporting it, you may add it to articles rightfully.
If there is consensus against it, or no clear consensus, you may not add it to articles.

I'll be making the closing call on this, so I'll literally give you a final call on this, so there will be no interpretation needed on your part at all. If there is a consensus, I'll support your efforts to do it through pointing at the discussion I've started. If there is not consensus in favor of its use, however, and you continue to add it to articles after this, you will start receiving blocks every time you do it, which could lead to an indefinite block. Sergecross73 msg me 20:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict is in - he's unusable[edit]

Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews - there's a very clear consensus here that he is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. Do not add his reviews to review charts, or his opinions in reception sections. Since this is a long running dispute, you've been given enough warning up until this poin - if I catch you adding his info, you'll be blocked from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I disagree, I will comply and not use his pages as a source.--Soul Crusher (talk) 08:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014 revisiting[edit]

So, there's already 5 people opposing your pushing of his use as a source again. There's very little chance of a consensus changing on this, so I'm just reiterating my last warning that, you will be blocked if you act against this. Furthermore, I request that, unless something changes and he starts writing for [[Billboard (magazine}|Billboard]] or something, that you finally drop this and stop testing the patience of the community. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, this discussion has been up for about two days and none of the evidence I have presented to support my claim has been refuted. Your eagerness to have this swept under the rug and done away with is suspicious and your assertion that you are a neutral participant in this discussion of this topic is appearing more and more debatable.--Soul Crusher (talk) 01:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF - I'm only eager to be done with this because it's been spanning months, and it's wasting what little time I have for Wikipedia at the moment. I don't want to be bothered about this anymore. And yes, discussion is ongoing, I'm just saying it's not very often that a discussion reverses fortunes after the first 5 responses are detailed/relevant "opposes". And my stance is to uphold the prior consensus, where I neutrally closed a discussion with an unanimous consensus against his use. Sergecross73 msg me 02:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying, Sergecross.--Soul Crusher (talk) 04:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Forumshopping and last warning[edit]

Do not create the same discussions at multiple venues. That is called WP:FORUMSHOPing, which is not allowed, especially when you're doing it because things are clearly not going your way at one venue. I won't block you for this now, since its possible you were unaware that this was not allowed, but at the same time, I just advised you to drop these discussions, and you've not only ignored this, but have increased your efforts with your forumshopping.

I can't stop you from fruitlessly arguing your time away at the current discussion at the WP:ALBUMS talk page, but if you open up another new discussion in a new venue, or open up another one about PS at WP:ALBUMS after the current one is closed, then you will receive a block for disruptive editing. Two unanimously opposed discussions is enough, you need to stop pestering the community on this. Last warning - stop trying to force your viewpoint through. Sergecross73 msg me 21:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice.--Soul Crusher (talk) 02:48, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Radio Hades[edit]

The article Radio Hades has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Meatsgains (talk) 04:25, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]