User talk:Seerus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Seerus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 16:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Reliable sources[edit]

Please see our policy on reliable sources. For an page as controversial as child erotica, a blog post is an extremely questionable source and one that should only be added after consensus is achieved on the talk page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 16:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The blog is not the source, the videos are the source. 99.104.137.91 (talk) 19:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion about this at WP:MED, found here. Flyer22 (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Half-age-plus-seven rule[edit]

I don't understand where your vehemence on this matter comes from, but there's no impregnable wall surrounding the United States... AnonMoos (talk) 01:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My vehemence on the matter comes from the fact that the rule doesn't exist outside the USA. If it does, provide proof. --Seerus (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever -- in recent decades, anything which is reasonably culturally prominent in the U.S. is bound to at least become known to many in other English-speaking nations (unless it is very closely tied to local particular U.S.-specific circumstances -- and not even always then). Given this, some might ask for your evidence that it's strictly and exclusively rigidly confined to the U.S. only. AnonMoos (talk) 12:48, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The burden of proof is on you. There are only American sources, so it's logical to assume that it's a part of only American culture, not otherwise. --Seerus (talk) 21:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since people outside the United States seem to be objecting to your edits, the burden would seem to be on you to demonstrate that there is an impenetrable force-field around the United States... AnonMoos (talk) 02:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Messsage[edit]

Hi Seerus. I've posted a reply at WT:WikiProject Medicine which you might like to read. I have reverted your move one last time, as I am assuming that you were unaware of both WP:BRD and the edit warring policy. Please feel free to engage in discussion. Regards Basalisk inspect damageberate 08:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your message regarding "Clickable map" on "Syrian civil war detailed map" talk page[edit]

Thank you for pointing out the problem. It is now fixed. Tradedia (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Republic and Chechnya[edit]

If you don't think the names Czech Republic and Chechnya are similar, please see this page: [1]. JIP | Talk 16:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know about it. But it was just a false hype, these people were just a tiny minority of idiots. Each of the names sounds completely different. And the disambig page is also unneccessary because in each article the location of the country is clearly specified.--Seerus (talk) 16:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page is largely a copy and paste job from The Hidden Wiki, which is not the best way to create articles. New articles should satisfy WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 14:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The second paragraph is copied from there, because it primarily deals with Lolita City. I think there are enough reliable secondary sources, it's news outlets like msnbc.com etc. There's also an article specifically about Lolita City.--Seerus (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]