User talk:Philipnelson99/Archives/2024/March

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Huw McCarthy

A tag has been placed on Talk:Huw McCarthy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. (See section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ominateu (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Ominateu Just FYI, I only moved it from talk space into draft space. I understand twinkle doesn't know that though. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Of course. I just wantedto let you know. Ominateu (talk) 20:22, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Matthew Broderick

Is there a reason that you are not issuing BLP violation warnings to the users vandalizing this page? Does WP:DENY apply? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

WikiDan61 Take a look at the page history and I think you'll find that WP:DENY applies. It's a ongoing issue. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Message

Just saying Hi, please reply. Someonethesecond (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

yo hi friend 2601:84:300:5CB0:8CA3:730:C66E:A14E (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Message from 75.142.254.3

You recently left me a notification. Is there some better way to address these sorts of issues? I'm finding it difficult to evaluate this sort of thing without coming to that conclusion. Can you link me some wikipedia guidelines or such that can help?

75.142.254.3 (talk) 00:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #147 is out: On identity

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss the notion of identity and present our latest document about how we represent it, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 15:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Phillip I want to ask a question? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.240.105.238 (talk) 19:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Correction?

Hi, I am doing research into this artwork and have found the information that was just posted. It is an integral element of the artwork. I am working with the Institution that now holds they artwork. They have approved the addition of information about the work. JeffreyBoone

I will paste you message below.

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kate Craig—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 19:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am doing research into this artwork and have found the information that was just posted. It is an integral element of the artwork. I am working with the Institution that now holds they artwork. They have approved the addition of information about the work. JeffreyBoone (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #148 is out: On the way to internationalizing numbers

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss our progresses with the implementation of renderers and parsers for natural numbers, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 14:11, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #149 is out: Creating tests is now much easier!

There is a new update for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it!

In this issue, we discuss our progresses with tests and how it is easier to make them, and we take a look at the latest software developments.

Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check our archive!

Enjoy the reading! -- User:Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Jimmy Savile sexual abuse scandal

Hi, I'm not the IP you've reverted but I am not sure I agree with your revert. 'Crimes' seems a reasonable way to phrase it and in any case I think some of their edits are uncontroversial and should not be reverted, like removing his first name in subsequent mentions. Jtrrs0 (talk) 20:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

@Jtrrs0 I think you're mistaken. My revert removed deliberate vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)