User talk:Pascal.Tesson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Was going to create a page for the New York Headache Center, however you previously deleted this page. It will be similar content, as its the same subject, but please let me know if I will be able to post it without being deleted. Thanks. --LaurenAClements (talk) 01:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created a page on Dusty Schmidt.. was in the midst of editing it.. could you give me the deleted contents so I can put it up properly? thank you :) Vejoyie (talk) 11:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious why you put a delete mark on the GDiesel page. Just getting to this now. See URL.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDiesel. How does one know when a page is set for "delete?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by George2140 (talkcontribs) 17:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you deleted the explanation for the LDS film "Journey of Faith" for advertising reasons. I am curious if an explination about the film can be made for it that for those who wish to read what it is about that is not advertising. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.237.155.130 (talk) 22:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to update/edit the page pertaining to WHIP Student Run Radio but it says you deleted the page that was started in the past. Just curious why you deleted it, and what can be done to bring it back so it can be updated and published. There are multiple published news articles and valid sources that will be cited, which verify the station's existence, history, and accomplishments. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andykato (talkcontribs) 21:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will miss you[edit]

I noticed this and this, and wanted to come here to say that I will miss you. You've always been a fair and reasonable person, as well as someone I've constantly respected: for you to leave is a loss. Very best wishes to you. Acalamari 21:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy note about Talk:Kartoos[edit]

Hi Pascal.Tesson,
I've re-started Talk:Kartoos.
Message was:

A page with this title has previously been deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

  • 13:05, 3 April 2009 Pascal.Tesson (talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Kartoos" ‎ (Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page (CSD G8))

--Shirt58 (talk) 10:55, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yes. What Acalamari said.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SV Wehen Wiesbaden[edit]

Just to let you know I am recreating the category because there are a couple of other categories that need to go into this category. Kingjeff (talk) 21:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join Stanford's WikiProject![edit]

View of Hoover Tower from Main Quad.

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Stanford University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Stanford University. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

ralphamale (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect page and/or remove {{administrator}}[edit]

Hi. Please unprotect this user page and/or remove the {{administrator}} template. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template removed. The Helpful One 01:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie Siegel Nominated for Deletion Again[edit]

Just FYI, a second nomination for deletion has been placed on an article that you have weighed in on in the past. You can see the discussion at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bernie_Siegel_%282nd_nomination%29 Rosencomet (talk) 16:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change[edit]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diango (Movie Guide)[edit]

hello

I was going to create a redirect to Django but i noticed that you deleted the redirect because it led to a wrong page.

The Movie Guide list has Diango and should be redirected to Django. I was wondering whether or not to create the redirect.

Thanks. :)

MfD nomination of User:Cfleetwood/n2n[edit]

User:Cfleetwood/n2n, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cfleetwood/n2n and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Cfleetwood/n2n during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A probable misundersrtanding in Melchisédech Thévenot[edit]

Hi, I am looking for a second opinion before changing/ deleting the following detail in Melchisédech Thévenot. The section Scientific studies reads Thévenot studied astronomy, physics, medicine, and magnetism, and demonstrated in the 1660s the possibility that atmospheric pulsations had something to do with human and animal respiration.

It seems this is false and due to misunderstanding of the www.encyclopedia.com entry for this guy. Here is what can be read there:

 One other incident made Thévenot a subject of discussion in the scientific salons: his presentation and development of a theory concerning the cause of human and animal respiration. Sometime during 1660 an unnamed person at the Montmor Academy had suggested that a constant atmospheric pulsation caused the “movements of the heart, of the punctum saliens of the egg, that of the brain, the diaphragm, or of respiration […] Thévenot spread this news through Oldenburg and Huygens, and it was widely discussed for a time. This incident is quite typical of the sort of experiment performed and the type of tales told in seventeenth-century science, and Thévenot is not to be imagined a fool.

https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/thevenot-melchisedech

Should this sentence be deleted, or changed as to strees the fact this was not a demonstration but rather a false idea discussed in a typical 17th century state of mind ? Thanks Hexagone59 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Jbabson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSS💬 16:53, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rottrevore for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rottrevore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rottrevore (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 02:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Universal Indicator (collective) albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"DOTE" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect DOTE. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 23#DOTE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 01:39, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"PGA Tour® Golf" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect PGA Tour® Golf and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#PGA Tour® Golf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 05:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Luke Ski albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:18, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]