User talk:OldPalChummus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on rail articles[edit]

I was happy to see those big green diffs on my watchlist when you expanded several railroad articles significantly, like Providence, Warren and Bristol Railroad. I've been gradually trying to get to them all, but I'm very glad to see you're working on them too. Keep up the good work! Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! OldPalChummus (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

East Junction Branch photos[edit]

Would you be able to add coordinates to File:East Junction Branch South.jpg and File:East Junction Branch East Providence.jpg? I'm not able to place exactly where along the branch they are. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the coordinates to the descriptions of both images. OldPalChummus (talk) 03:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! Those are actually abandoned sections of the East Providence Branch (Valley Falls–East Providence), which is confusingly now connected to the East Junction Branch for P&W use. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:43, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, good to know! Thanks! OldPalChummus (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
East-West Passenger Rail (Massachusetts), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello OldPalChummus! Your additions to Little Compton, Rhode Island have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: West Island (Rhode Island) (August 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SportingFlyer T·C 10:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It really isn't necessary to add South Coast to every article located within this informal region. Moreover, there is absolutely no reason to add explicit details about what places are included and not included in the South Coast. Please take a moment to read WP:USCITIES. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: West Island (Rhode Island) has been accepted[edit]

West Island (Rhode Island), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OLI 08:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey mate I felt like doing you a solid as both you and me are relatively new editors.(me more so then you) But I do have recomendations for your new article. Add wikilinks to it and add categories. We dont want it to be orphanned and disconected to the rest of the wiki. Dont stop expanding it just because its been made. I made this mistake with some of my first articles. (I built them off of a redirect, and they got deleted) OLI 08:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

East Junction Branch[edit]

My apologies for reverting your edit wholesale - I was in the middle of responding to the good article review and your edits conflicted with my edits to address the reviewer's concerns. Please feel free to participate at the review page. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 19:53, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Frederick S. Peck, from its old location at User:OldPalChummus/sandbox2. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick S. Peck has been accepted[edit]

Frederick S. Peck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- RichT|C|E-Mail 21:40, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Star Mississippi 01:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, OldPalChummus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 01:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Whittenton Branch, from its old location at User:OldPalChummus/sandbox6. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 00:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whittenton Branch has been accepted[edit]

Whittenton Branch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 03:33, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: West Bridgewater Branch (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 09:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library[edit]

You should be eligible to use The Wikipedia Library, it's a great place to find more sources for articles. I particularly recommend newspaperarchive and newspapers.com. You may be able to find enough additional information to get those drafts about branches accepted through AfC. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll definitely do that! OldPalChummus (talk) 17:45, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Hope Branch (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S5A-0043 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S5A-0043Talk 14:52, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]