User talk:OAnick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, OAnick, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 17:11, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hello![edit]

Hiya Nick, I just discovered your Wikipedia page so I thought I'd leave a message saying hey. Feel free to contact me on my talk page or by email for all things Wikiepdia.

See you later, Imogen at Leeds Uni Library (talk) 08:40, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy notice[edit]

Your editing is being discussed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Suspect_or_acceptable.3F. Please consider joining the discussion. --Ronz (talk) 17:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for responding. Could you give some further explanation so other editors who come across these edits will understand what's going on? Addressing copyrights would help. --Ronz (talk) 15:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've put some information on the University Library blog that I will also include on my talk page and point to in any future edits - https://leedsunilibrary.wordpress.com/2017/07/14/wikipedia-information-literacy-and-open-access/comment-page-1/#comment-55 — Preceding unsigned comment added by OAnick (talkcontribs) 10:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 15:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this work. I found [1] and I encourage you to continue adding Wikipedia-cited works to your institutional repository as well as links to those copies from Wikipedia articles. Your edits were probably subject to more discussion than usual because it was a busy time or because of links not going to PDFs directly, but policies clearly support adding URLs of OA PDFs in existing citations. Let me know if you need more suggestions of DOIs to deposit or links to add with OAbot's help (there are currently 112 http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk links in the queue). --Nemo 17:22, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nemo, appreciate you taking the time to comment! I've been encouraged recently by the discussion around this issue https://wikimediafoundation.org/2018/08/20/how-many-wikipedia-references-are-available-to-read/

I just noticed we're now over 700 articles with a link to eprints.whiterose.ac.uk, that's wonderful! I hope the repository keeps expanding its collection of green open access copies of works cited on Wikipedia. Nemo 14:15, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes I link an OA version whenever I spot one and encouraging use of Wikipedia across the institution. May be interested in this article http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.509 Nick Sheppard (talk) 15:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, nice write-up! Kudos for citing all Wikimedia projects. Nemo 18:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
And good to have the dataset in Zenodo, but too bad for the XSLX format... a preservation and FLOSS-friendly ODT is always better, in my view! But just nitpicking. If you want I can write a very simplistic SQL query to make such counts for those domains in a click, à la quarry:query/31224. Nemo 04:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Hello! Lbarnes1993 (talk) 14:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nautilus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypoxia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Wilson Armistead[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Wilson Armistead at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mhhossein talk 14:42, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wilson Armistead[edit]

On 13 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilson Armistead, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1851, Wilson Armistead from Leeds hosted escaped slaves Ellen and William Craft when they fled the United States after the Fugitive Slave Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilson Armistead. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Wilson Armistead), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huang Daopo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Songjiang. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Quickstatements[edit]

Hello, OAnick. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quickstatements".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for the informative edit to the sewage article. I rather favor its initial placement in the Disposal section over its later placement in the Treatment section; although I think the concept might warrant an intermediate Reclamation section. What are your thoughts? Thewellman (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewellman: Thanks. Yes I think so too...just didn't have time! Probably also more out there for such a section?

HiLeedsproject2019 (talk) 14:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[edit]

Hi Nick

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Just popping in off the back of our Twitter chat to say hi :-) drkirstyross (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Real Life Barnstar
Well done, Nick: you have earned the Real Life Barnstar by organising the event "Contributing to the global commons: A Wikipedia 'how to' session" at the University of Leeds, and for your other efforts promoting the Wikimedia platforms within the university sector. MartinPoulter (talk) 11:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blick Mead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2023[edit]

Delivered February 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

19:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2023[edit]

Delivered March 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

12:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2023[edit]

Delivered April 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

19:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2023[edit]

Delivered May 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

20:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - June 2023[edit]

Delivered June 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

22:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dress history[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Dress history at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - July 2023[edit]

Delivered July 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

11:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - August 2023[edit]

Delivered August 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

10:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - September 2023[edit]

Delivered September 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

12:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Editing[edit]

Hallo Nick, Thanks for your edits to All Saints' Church, Harewood, which I saw as it's on my watch list (I started the article many years ago, after singing in a wonderful come-and-sing rendition of a 40-part choral work there to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Redundant Churches Trust).

A few little points:

  • Please remember that refs go after punctuation, not before
  • Please remember not to use "curly" single or double quotes, even within quoted text (one of the few permitted changes to quoted text)
  • Please remember to give enough info in a reference so that someone could trace the article without clicking on the web link: I've upgraded your ref to the Dawson paper, as just "Proquest" was really inadequate.
  • Reference names don't need to be in quotes unless they include spaces, so I don't know why you added quotes to so many of them: unnecessary clutter. (I make a point of using hyphens rather than spaces in ref names, just to avoid the quotes)

Thanks, PamD 15:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @PamD - just a few quick edits after a turn round the All Saints Graveyard this morning when out with the dog, I’m still a novice and not necessarily great at the detail!
I knew the proquest reference was insufficient but was struggling to find the full reference.
Don’t quite understand the last point? For references I tend to use the auto-generate feature…has that introduced quotes?
Appreciate the pointers. The great thing about Wikipedia of course is that someone will come and tidy up after me 😀
I’d love to go back and see inside sometime. Nick Sheppard (talk) 18:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"someone will come and tidy up after me", of course, but ideally you shouldn't need the same tidying up too often! I see Keith D fixed another misplaced ref, or misplaced fullstop.
I don't know what the "auto-generate feature" is, or why it would mess with existing reference names: do you use Visual Editor or text editing, I wonder? There are so many options and alternatives that we can all end up with a different editing environment.
Note that all- numeric dates are allowed as an option for "access-date", but not when the article has an established style of using dmy dates for the access-date (as any article started by me will have, I don't like numeric dates).
As for the Dawson ref, just put in the info you can see on screen. it doesn't seem to have a doi. If you really can't work out how to format a ref it's better to include a full but badly-formatted ref, rather than well-formatted but uninformative.
There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it's an interesting journey. Enjoy your editing! PamD 20:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Always interesting to see people from Leeds Uni: I wrote the University Library's first web page in August 1994, during 26 years working there till early-retiring 20 years ago! PamD 20:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I mostly use visual editor with the 'cite' button which just creates a reference from a doi or web link. I do find wiki mark up tricky, I'm better with html! Would love to have seen that first webpage from 1994 :)
Confess I do tend to rely on the division of labour and that someone will be much more adept at formatting etc. I do need to get better though. Discussed a bit in this podcast with @MartinPoulter: The open knowledge revolution: contributing to the global commons with Wikimedian Dr Martin Poulter
With Martin's support, we're doing a fair bit of work at UoL to promote Wikimedia, also see this podcast: Wikimedia Champions at the University of Leeds
Do let me know if you'd like to know more, or even share your expertise as a former librarian from Leeds. Feel free to drop me an email n.sheppard(at)leeds.ac.uk Nick Sheppard (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MartinPoulter: Can't even figure out how to tag Martin! Why didn't it work above? Nick Sheppard (talk) 08:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - October 2023[edit]

Delivered October 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

13:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Ilkley bomber site[edit]

Here - 53°55.0035′0″N 1°51.6668′0″W / 53.91672°N 1.86111°W / 53.91672; -1.86111 ? ... based on https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5042266 ? --Tagishsimon (talk) 18:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - November 2023[edit]

Delivered November 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

11:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - December 2023[edit]

Delivered December 2023 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

19:22, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, OAnick. Thank you for your work on Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor. Storye book, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this interesting article. I have given it a minor copyedit, and added an infobox and commons category, plus a header paragraph. I have checked it for copyvio, and rephrased a few words to avoid that problem. I have also added a few links to it, in other articles, so that it is not an orphan, and added a few Wikiprojects to the talk page. Looking at a past conversation on your talk page, I strongly recommend that you compare the changes that I have made, and learn from them. You still need to put references after punctuation, for example. That said, I am glad that you have created this article, and I look forward to seeing more articles from you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Storye book}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Storye book (talk) 19:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Storye book: Blimey, thanks for your work on Pilgrims’ Cross. Fascinating! Nick Sheppard (talk) 20:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peel Monument (Ramsbottom)[edit]

Thanks @Storye book I thought I'd got the reference thing tbh!
I've also done a major rewrite (and rename) of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peel_Monument_(Ramsbottom)
It's the first rewrite I've done and not totally sure of the etiquette...the last previous edit was a year ago so just thought I'd go ahead. Let me know what you think (probably needs an infobox?)
Have checked references after punctuation :) Nick Sheppard (talk) 19:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have done a quick copyedit of the Peel Monument article. There are a few issues remaining. One is that the header (opening para) is supposed to be a quick summary of the main body of the article. Therefore we don't put citations in the header; we repeat the information (with citations) in the body of the article.
I always find it easiest when starting an article from scratch to first amass a pile of sources, then create the body of the article from that. Lastly I add the header as a summary. That way, I don't end up with any uncited paras, or a header which does not properly summarise the article. I also find that it is useful to insert the infobox form as early as possible, because it acts as a good prompt for research and inclusion of essential facts. Because starting with a pile of sources would not be well-received on WP, I always begin the article construction in userspace. Everybody has their own way of starting their article construction, of course; that is only one way, but it does help to prevent certain errors.
Another issue is that you have some rather awkward, long sentences. They would make more sense if you changed the order of the material in them, or - even better - if you divided them into shorter sentences. Think about "which he had also built in 1832, when viewed from his home at Nuttall Hall". or "Built at a cost of £1000 raised through public appeal and standing 128 feet,[1][2] the gritstone used to construct the monument was quarried". Written in the right order, long sentences with great, overarching clauses, and an atom bomb at the end (so to speak), can be powerful - or witty. If you want to be in control of your long sentences, one of the best examples to imitate is Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall. On the other hand, short sentences can be powerful in another way, especially if you are piling on the facts, then ending with the main point. The main thing is to be in control.
If you want an infobox, Template:Infobox monument would fit. Good luck, and I look forward to seeing more articles from you. Storye book (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have now rephrased the abovementioned long sentences for you. I hope that helps. Storye book (talk) 10:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thank you!
If you have time and inclination, you might have a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_Armistead which I've been working on for ages and which probably suffers from the same.
Think I've run out of online sources for Wilson but there's stuff in Special Collections at UoL I want to look at, and plan to visit the Leeds Library at some point.
Thanks again Nick Sheppard (talk) 10:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just took a quick glance at the first half of the Wilson article, and the Standard English looks fine to me. I see you've already had PamD on there - it's always worth taking her edit summaries seriously, bearing in mind she is one of our best editors on the British articles. Storye book (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if you mean Leeds Central Library (public library next to Town Hall) or Leeds Library (private, -fee-paying library in Commercial Street). I guess you know all this already, but if you haven't been there - the indexing in Leeds Central Library is very good, and last time I was there it was the Business library which fronted the reference books, though there is also a Local Studies section - both upstairs. UoL has an excellent search engine for its books, but if you're not currently a member you need an appointment. But forgive me if you already know all this. Last time I was in Leeds Library (the private one), they had a wonderful collection and lovely staff, but no proper indexing, to the extent that they didn't really know what books they had, or didn't have. Sigh. Storye book (talk) 12:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I mean https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leeds_Library where Wilson was a member and out of which he and his wife ran the Leeds Anti Slavery Association.
I haven't spent much time at the Central Library tbh, I did go to an editathon there once and have a good contact there - I'd like to do more wiki stuff across Leeds, bringing together the University, library and museums. Everyone's so busy though! Nick Sheppard (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've found sources for Wilson through the Thoresby Society website, which I think is based at the Leeds Library. Really should get down there https://www.thoresby.org.uk/index.html Nick Sheppard (talk) 12:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they are a good bunch of people. I contributed to Leeds Tiger along with two museum archive people - that was quite exciting when they kindly opened the glass case so that I could photograph it. When I was in a phase of doing Victorian churches with their clergy, the Central Library staff used to bring all their Crockfords down on a trolley to the Business dept - really kind of them, as they were heavy to manhandle, like that (now there's a few Crockfords online, which helps). The LCL library ticket is really useful for their free online subscriptions, e.g. to Who's Who and various newspapers. Storye book (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That reminds me - if you are doing Holcombe Moor - you maybe have access to the Manchester library and museum? I'm just wondering if they have: Tracy, William Burnett (1901). Pike, W. T. (ed.). Vol. 2. Manchester and Salford at the Close of the Nineteenth Century.' Brighton, Sussex: W. T. Pike & Co. (known as Pike Manchester). It's exactly the right date for our Rev. Henry Dowsett of Pilgrims' Cross fame - there might be a pic of him and short biog in there. Worth a try? He was a bit of a character - officially an Anglican priest, but a Puritan who tried to ban dancing, apparently. If you can't get at Pike Manchester, I'll try the British Library at Wetherby, when I can get there (a four-bus round trip and some walking ... ) Storye book (talk) 16:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately not…I grew up in Lancashire, about 3 miles from Holcombe Village. Could see the tower across the valley from my house 😀 Nick Sheppard (talk) 18:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, then you'll know exactly how the country people would have all known each other for generations, and in 1901 they will have had a very good idea about who destroyed the Pilgrim's Cross foundation stone, and why. My guess is that they knew how fond of the stone Dowsett was, and he had upset somebody. Bearing in mind that he had been going around telling people off for dancing, I daresay there was no shortage of motivations. Local journalists always know, too, but local papers are always scared of publishing anything too controversial. Kick one and they all limp, haha. So we'll never know, but I bet they did. Storye book (talk) 18:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good theory! I used to run up there past Pilgrims’ Cross - never did the fell race though - took my wife up there on one of our first dates, in Winter…2008. Perhaps surprisingly we’re still married. I’ve a picture of us sat on the stone, so it’s great to have such detailed history up on Wikipedia. Nick Sheppard (talk) 18:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic! I've just discovered that Dowsett had a wife called Lydia Luce, from St Helier. I suspect that she had a lot to put up with, what with him stomping about on the moor doing antiquarian stuff with his mates, writing books and grumping about dancing, hehe. At least I suppose all that kept him out of her way. Storye book (talk) 19:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I dug out the photo. The part of the inscription that’s visible is…unfortunate https://x.com/mrnick/status/1742983149079130441?s=46 Nick Sheppard (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, good one! Another bit of good news is that I have just received a better scan of the cart-and-village photo. If you zoom in, you can just glimpse the ears of some of the 14 horses, the heavy iron cartwheels with chocks, and the nicely-dressed (antiquarians?) on the right. I guess Dowsett was behind the camera, because I'm betting that if he had had the chance he would have been strutting front-of-stage. I'll upload it in a little while, and use it to replace the current version in the article.
By the way, I've had a rethink about the whodunnit. The controversy about the requisition of land for the firing range started by 1901, and it would have been in the interest of pro-firing-range people to remove any monument which got in the way of their case. And it was local people who staffed the local Territorial Army. And that might explain why it would have been expedient for Dowsett to get an important-looking replacement up there pronto. Storye book (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image is much better!

DYK for Pilgrims' Cross[edit]

Do you think we could do a DYK for this article? Nick Sheppard (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So I think if I do a DYK nomination and mention you as reviewer, you'll automatically get credit?
Now just need a hook... Nick Sheppard (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've already got it in hand. I've done the QPQ, and thought of at least one hook - the 14 horses, which have really captured my imagination - though you're welcome to add other ALTs. The picture would of course be one of the monument ID pictures - possibly the one you initially chose for the article. You as creator, me as contributor and nominator - so we each get one DYK credit. The article is both new enough, long enough, and already has been expanded 5X, so we get to jump through all the hoops. If you had already set your heart on doing the nomination yourself, I apologise - If I do it I shall have to do it today, because I don't know if I'll be free to do it at the weekend, so may miss the 7-day slot. Just take it as me bagsying the time slot, and you are very welcome to change any other details. Hope that's OK? Storye book (talk) 16:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No that's great thanks! Nick Sheppard (talk) 16:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Did you know nominations/Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor. Done. Thank you for your patience with this. As I said, please change the details and hook as you wish. At least we've bagged the time slot now. We don't yet have proper pictures of the horses, but I suspect that they exist. I have been given the info that Bury Archive has 5 pictures in the set (presumably four dated 24 May 1902 and one dated before 1901) titled: 1. Holcombe (the village pic that we have?), 2. Harcles Hill, 3. Moorbottom Road, 4. unloading new stone, 5. socket destroyed 1901 (possibly Henry Dowsett's pic that we have?).
Meanwhile, I have sent for a modern reprint of Pike Manchester and Pike Lancashire, in the hope that Dowsett might be in one of them. Even if he is not, I shall at least be able to upload the indexes to the W.T. Pike Commons category, so that our editors can check out what is in there. One way or another, it should be useful. Storye book (talk) 17:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peat restoration with wool logs[edit]

Hi Nick,

Here are the wool log peatland links:

Swaledale wool entrepreneur's attempt to save ancient peatland | The Northern Farmer

Yorkshire Dales: Wool logs placed on moorland to protect peat - BBC News

Innovation In Wool Award 2023 – Worshipful Company of Woolmen

First wool logs laid on Dales peatland : Yorkshire Dales National Park

First wool logs laid on Dales peatland in boost for fleece trade | Darlington and Stockton Times

Sheep fleeces used in Yorkshire Dales peatland restoration - Richmondshire Today

Fleet Moss: Wool entrepreneur tries to save ancient peatland | The Northern Echo

Not much info on here: Sheep fleeces are being used in a pilot project on peat restoration in The Dales and North York Moors (yorkshirepost.co.uk) Brecon21 (talk) 15:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - January 2024[edit]

Delivered January 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

13:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - February 2024[edit]

Delivered February 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

12:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor[edit]

On 7 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 6-ton (6.1-tonne) Pilgrims' Cross (pictured), high on Holcombe Moor, England, was dragged up there with difficulty by 14 horses? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pilgrims' Cross, Holcombe Moor), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ganesha811 (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article that you created got 7,776 views at DYK. Congratulations! Storye book (talk) 09:55, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks for your help Nick Sheppard (talk) 10:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Storye book (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For live demo[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_economy https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00803

There has been widespread adoption of circular economic models in agriculture which is essential to global food security and to help mitigate against climate changee, however there are also potential risks to human and environmental health from contaminants remaining in recycled water or organic material.

These risks can be mitigated by addressing three specific issues that will also depend on the local context. These are contaminant monitoring, collection, transport, and treatment, and regulation and policy. Nick Sheppard (talk) 14:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - March 2024[edit]

Delivered March 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

12:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Leeds Wikipedia meetup on Saturday 4th May[edit]

Hello there! Interested in having a chat with fellow Wikipedians? There's a meetup in Leeds on Saturday 4th May 2024, at the Tiled Hall Café at Leeds Central Library.

Full details here.

You're receiving this one-off message as you're either a member of WikiProject Yorkshire, you've expressed an interest in a previous Leeds meetup years ago, or (for about 4 of you), we've met :)

I plan to organise more in future, so if you'd like to be notified next time, please say so over on the meetup page.

Please also invite any Wikimedia people you know (or have had wiki dealings with) – spread the word! Hope to see you there.

Jonathan Deamer (talk)

20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - April 2024[edit]

Delivered April 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

12:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Lord Chaberlain’s Plays

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C10233

https://blogs.bl.uk/english-and-drama/2016/10/the-lord-chamberlain-regrets-.html

https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/press/urban-collection-of-lord-chamberlain%E2%80%99s-plays-published-online

https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2002.10871891

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/C472BCA1050A07C108746AFA33C211F6/S0266464X03000265a.pdf/the-lord-chamberlain-and-the-containment-of-americanization-in-the-british-theatre-of-the-1920s.pdf

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-theatre-quarterly/article/censoring-revolution-the-lord-chamberlain-and-the-soviet-union/0D5FDB5F4BC839EB52CFDF28A7ABA75B

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.1929.tb00535.x

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00014949

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0424208400001492

https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/jur/vol7/iss1/18/

WikiProject Yorkshire Newsletter - May 2024[edit]

Delivered May 2024 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.

22:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)