User talk:Nhatminh01

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Nhatminh01, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 14:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Please stop moving pages[edit]

Please stop moving these and open a discussion first. Imzadi 1979 → 02:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2018 FIFA World Cup Final, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 00:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GAN for 2018 FIFA World Cup Final[edit]

I noticed that you nominated 2018 FIFA World Cup Final for GA status. Per the instructions page, you should consult the major contributors to the article or area experts before nominating. I don't think the article is ready for GAN status, as the post-match section is underdeveloped and things haven't settled down yet (being less than 48 hours since the final and all). I suggest that you retract your nomination. Sounder Bruce 00:43, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you've also nominated 2002, 2010, and the main 2018 page. Unless you've majorly edited them, I also suggest retracting them. Read up on the GA criteria first. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:07, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been making many GA nominations of articles for which you are not a significant contributor. Please note that the GA instructions state Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination. This is something you have not done; consultation should last seven days to allow the regular editors to respond. I have reverted your nomination of the 2018 FIFA World Cup Final article, since you have not made any significant edits to it and the article is currently undergoing frequent changes and would fail the stability requirement of the GA criteria linked to by Anarchyte. I will check the other articles you have nominated, and will revert any nomination where you are not a significant contributor; another one noto mentioned above is Exoplanet. Please, before you plunge into various processes, do more investigating or ask around about how they work; it will make things more rewarding for you and save others from having to undo your edits. Thank you, and I hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect[edit]

Hi, I've redirected the page "List of Nobel laureates by university affiliation (from 11-35 laureates)" back to the main page. There is currently no consensus on further splitting the main article. Please use Talk Page, if needed. Minimumbias (talk) 06:53, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA pages[edit]

Hi, I'm not quite sure what you're doing with the the GA pages, but you should probably stop. Changes should be discussed not implemented unilaterally. There's a good chance they'll confuse the bot or be reverted by him.

As an aside: what you claim on your userpage is inaccurate.--Carabinieri (talk) 09:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be the 4th or 5th editor to ask you to please stop nominating pages for GA. Helping to get pages there is something valuable to the project but it's important that you've made a regular contribution to the pages before nominating them. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pages including Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2023[edit]

Do we really need all these pages that are five years or so away? Home Lander (talk) 14:53, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor not responding to concerns on their talk page. Home Lander (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Wikipedia:Good articles/Summary into User:Nhatminh01/GA header. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 01:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural block only, as you are required to discuss your edits here when others express concern. If you are unable to discuss your edits because of language difficulties, you should contribute to the Wikipedia for your native language. Any admin may lift this block without consulting me once you display a willingness and ability to discuss your edits. --Laser brain (talk) 01:06, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 Summer Olympics football game documentation[edit]

Template:2016 Summer Olympics football game documentation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Haiti[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Haiti, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is a draft which has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dolotta (talk) 14:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]