User talk:Nesshunter

This is Nesshunter's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hi Nesshunter! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 23:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Nesshunter (talk) 23:12, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown ammonia (December 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wiktionary is not a reliable source as it is user contributed and it is currently the only citation - please provide reliable sources in published secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brown ammonia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 14:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nesshunter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liance^talk 14:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown ammonia (December 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brown ammonia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown ammonia (December 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I see no reason to have a seperate article on "Brown ammonia", a few sentences within the ammonia page would be more than enough. Add a redirect to the relevant part of the ammonia page if needed. N.B., Why does the first sentence have "Syngas" in it -- a typo I think.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brown ammonia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove declination information[edit]

That is highly inappropriate. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Browser malfunction user error Nesshunter (talk) 12:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regards the typo very rare I make any Nesshunter (talk) 12:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please restrict comments to a talk page Nesshunter (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your enthusiasm is appreciated, however I would ask that you slow down and learn how things work here before trying to plunge into a bit of everything. A few tips:

Please do not add links to drafts in articles.
Don't add external links to an article without a good reason. This edit copied the previous user, which added a promotional link.
Please explain your changes using edit summaries. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and clicking the "Save" button.

Thanks, and happy editing. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link moved not placed you've the wrong account. Nesshunter (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created the draft it's in dispute, I need it on. It's online all of a few days. Nesshunter (talk) 10:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delineate ammonia direct syngas and via haber then it's not done Nesshunter (talk) 11:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ammonia economy since difficulties utili ty gas hydrogen Nesshunter (talk) 11:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AmandaNP, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wp:sock Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AmandaNP Bbb23 L235 stop Nesshunter (talk) 15:04, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nesshunter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

disputed Nesshunter (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:09, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{userbox Novice}} Nesshunter (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nesshunter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

wp:crony]] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jpgordon Nesshunter (talk) 16:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nah. Talk page access revoked. Spicy (talk) 17:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS[edit]

UTRS appeal #87611 is the latest of several unblock requests at UTRS, all of which have been declined. JBW (talk) 21:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]