User talk:Naj'entus

I reverted your edit to Shooting Star (drone) because of the misspelling of controlling into "con, wtrolling", and I thought you either made a mistake or were vandalizing. Your current edit seems appropriate. Thanks! - PabloMartinez (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

No problem! Btw, you clarified this on my page just as I wrote about the incident on your page :) Naj'entus (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Saratov Airlines Flight 703

On 11 February 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Saratov Airlines Flight 703, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Saratov Airlines Flight 703

This is en-Wiki, we don't all speak fluent Russian. Many of us have to rely on Google Translate, which does a reasonable job, but only makes a literal translation. Mjroots (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

• Neither do I; the article cited in that passage was in English. Naj'entus (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018 Israel–Iran incident

There's a discussion about renaming the article going on the talk page. You should have at least checked it before moving. Emesik (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

• Damn. Didn't notice it, sorry :( Naj'entus (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Discrimination sidebar

Here is a link to all articles with the discrimination side bar, notice that they are all ideas and not events. Of 19 (talk) 05:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

• WEll, I don't know the rules so maybe I'm wrong. But I gave it a random glance and noticed this for example: Khairlanji massacre . It's not really a concept, is it? Naj'entus (talk) 05:26, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

About Battle of Deir ez-Zor

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Battle of Deir ez-Zor a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Zawl 17:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

It's a disambiguation page with no additional input by anyone. It's just a list of links. You can't really plagiarize a list of links, can you? Naj'entus (talk) 17:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Copy-pasting is unacceptable on Wikipedia, whether or not it's a disambiguation page. Page history matters and an admin should histmerge the duplicated pages you created to clear the mess. — Zawl 18:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macau Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yuan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Edit to Ugly Laws

Hi Naj’entus! Thanks for your edit on Ugly Laws. I undid your edit since I put those sections there as placeholders. I am a Visiting Scholar and working on this article intensively right now. Please do join me in adding content to the article. Best, Jackiekoerner (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cargo 200 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scientific atheism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cold War II, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 13:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Uhm, sweetie... Start a talk page discussion if in your opinion it's unconstructive. And in that talk page discussion you should provide an explanation as to why you think it's unconstructive. Naj'entus (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cold War II. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 14:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Uhm, sweetie, explain your position on the talk page as I asked before sending automated messages. I explained myself in the very first edit summary. Naj'entus (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

It's not a "position" - Your edit cuts a verb out of a sentence, and introduces a major grammatical error. Scr★pIron^IV 14:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Jaysh al-Islam

I filed a complaint about you on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --Corriebertus (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Discussion on Talk Jaysh al-Islam

• Please, read my apologies and explanation to you on User talk:Corriebertus#March 2018.
• On Talk:Jaysh al-Islam#Challenging the rightfullness of reverting edits 5March23:46 and 7March17:14, I've challenged two of your reverting edits. You might be interested to read that, and perhaps react on that. --Corriebertus (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deir ez-Zor airstrike

Hello, Naj'entus. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Deir ez-Zor airstrike, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Fiachra10003 (talk) 02:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)