User talk:Mr Man 1990

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mr Man 1990, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Harry the Dog WOOF 12:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben-Jamin[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ben-Jamin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:04, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben-Jamin[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ben-Jamin, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mediran (t • c) 12:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Harry the Dog WOOF 13:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Happysailor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Mastro without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, - Happysailor ^(Talk) 13:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have a new message![edit]

Hello, Mr Man 1990. You have new messages at Talk:Ben-Jamin.
Message added 13:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You have been reported for persistent promotion[edit]

It appears that you have created this account solely to engage in the promotion of a non-notable individual. You have persisted despite advice and warnings. This account has been reported as being used exclusively for promotion. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ben-Jamin Newham[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ben-Jamin Newham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told repeatedly that IMDb is not a reliable source. You have also been warned that you will have your editing privileges revoked if you keep creating inappropriate pages. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:21, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben-Jamin Newham for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben-Jamin Newham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben-Jamin Newham until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this article is a informative discription of a notable person… ust because YOU haven't heard of them doesn't make them unworthy of a page on wikipedia your wrong.. please stop reporting me.

Whether we have heard of them is not the issue. You have been given lots of good advice which you are choosing to ignore, and which will result in you being no longer able to edit Wikipedia. I will repeat - IMDb is not a reliable source, because it does not check the information that is submitted to it. Therefore basing an article on IMDb is always going to be a non-starter. Add to this that an actor with a few bit parts is very unlikely to pass the notability guidelines in the first place, you are unlikely to be able to produce a suitable article. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article, which you have now submitted several times under different titles does not claim encyclopedic notability, and has no reliable references (IMDb is not classified here as reliable). In the talk page of the article (now deleted) you make a comparison with another actor; the comparison is not valid, as she has appeared in several independently noted and notable productions and has a well-referenced article with independent, reliable third-party sources. Unless you can show affirmation of notability and good sources please do not create the article again, as after this warning it will be considered as potential vandalism.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for continually re-creating "articles" that are inappropriate for the project, personal attacks, etc. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 17:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ben-Jamin Newham for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ben-Jamin Newham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben-Jamin Newham (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 21:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]