User talk:Moonman313

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

David Datuna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

- Happysailor (Talk) 23:46, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome![edit]

Hello, Moishsoloway, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Y not? 17:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Olga Markes[edit]

Information icon Hello, Moonman313. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olga Markes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Olga Markes (Doronina) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Olga Markes (Doronina). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olga Markes (Doronina) (March 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi DoubleGrazing,
thanks for reviewing the draft and leaving your notes! I have attended to your comment about clarifying the name of the person, I hope it is not confusing now, could you check please?
As for the sources, I added more of them, including from published books' databases, audio streaming providers, official journals of higher educational institutions, an article on Forbes Women. I also believe that the nature of these sources speaks to the notability of the person. Could you please check the updated version and let me know if you think the draft is ready for resubmission?
Thanks! moish 11:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Moonman313! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts?[edit]

I am currently reviewing your draft, but I would like to know first, what is your connection to User:NastyaAlisina? @Smartse: Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 06:27, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, and thanks for taking the time to review. I do not know anyone by that name and have no connection to anyone with that username. moish 07:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olga Markes (Doronina) (June 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 22:37, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olga Markes (Doronina) (September 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 13:10, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Olga Markes[edit]

Hello, Moonman313. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Olga Markes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olga Markes (Doronina) (November 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]