User talk:Mockridge13

Marshall aid to the Netherlands was not cancelled. In fact, the Americans never threatened to cancel it. Friend is simply wrong on that score. The Americans only suspended Marshall aid to the Netherlands Indies. Not a major issue, because most of that had already been spent.

WW2 Famine in Philippines[edit]

Have you been able to find materials re WW2 Famine in Philippines?--Woogie10w (talk) 02:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Hi Mockridge! Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice you have made some improvements. Thank you and well done.

You should see WP:WELCOME for useful information on Wikipedia. However, I would like to bring your attention to a few things:

When you make an edit, please fill out the edit summary by briefly describe the changes you have made and maybe a short rational for your change. This is helpful to other editors to understand your change.

Do not check the minor edit box. This is for formatting changes only. Changes to text and citations are not minor changes.

I see the comment you made at the top of this page was probably meant in regards to the edit you made to the Indonesian National Revolution article that Crisco 1492 reverted twice. He is not likely to see that comment here. The comment should have been 1) made on the edit summary; 2) made on Talk:Indonesian National Revolution; or 3) on User talk:Crisco 1492. On his talk page you only talk to him. On the article talk page others interested in the article may comment as well.

To add comments to talk pages, you go to those pages and click "New Section" at the top of the page (Be sure to give a title to the section) or click on the edit link next to a section title to add to a section. When making comments on a talk page make sure your comment starts on a new line by adding a blank line between yours and someone else's comment and sign your comment with "~~~~" so your name shows up with a time stamp. When you save the edit the four tildes (~~~~) get converted to something like this: Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope these points help you. Please enjoy editing Wikipedia. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 10:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Emil van Hoogstraten has been accepted[edit]

Jacob Emil van Hoogstraten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Elizabeth Adams (December 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Elizabeth Adams and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mockridge13, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Elizabeth Adams has been accepted[edit]

Jan Elizabeth Adams, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 17:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carel de Villeneuve has been accepted[edit]

Carel de Villeneuve, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Jan Reitsma has been accepted[edit]

Alexander Jan Reitsma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hertha Natzler (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Good , interesting read. Please help with WP:ELNO and preferably an infobox with a picture. Passes WP:ARTIST .

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hertha Natzler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devopam (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hertha Natzler has been accepted[edit]

Hertha Natzler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Devopam (talk) 13:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koos Sinninghe Damsté has been accepted[edit]

Koos Sinninghe Damsté, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SL93 (talk) 21:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mockridge13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Sitsen has been accepted[edit]

Peter Sitsen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 21:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Weijer has been accepted[edit]

George Weijer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curbon7 (talk) 01:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hertha Natzler 1930s.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hertha Natzler 1930s.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]