User talk:ME - Codasip

September 2022[edit]

Hello ME - Codasip. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ME - Codasip. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ME - Codasip|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 18:55, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 331dot,

Thank you very much for the information, I have updated my user page to add the disclosure.

I am trying to remove all marketing content from the draft that has been created earlier, and justify all text by links to published data. I understand it is too many links, and I can try to remove many of them or use other sources that would be more trusted.

Since there are other pages about very similar companies (e.g. SiFive, Andes Technology, LowRISC...) I guess there is no reason not to have a page for Codasip. I must also note that they uses the same sources (e.g. EETimes), which are authorities in the small world of Semiconductor Intellectual Property. This is not really a subject that the Wall-Street Journal often talks about!

I would enjoy your guidance about this.

Thank you very much.

Best regards, ME - Codasip (talk) 18:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Codasip (September 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This just tells about the company and what it does, it does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company. I fear that you may be too close to your company to write about it as Wikipedia requires(see your user talk page for important information). As odd as it may sound, you actually have too many sources. Fewer high quality sources are preferable to a large number of low quality sources. Please read Your First Article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Codasip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ME - Codasip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Codasip (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lots still unsourced, incl some of the History section and most of the Products section; separately, a WP:COI concern may affect this article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Codasip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]