User talk:Lightbluerain/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!

Hello, Lightbluerain, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rao Mohar Singh Memorial Senior Secondary Public School (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lightbluerain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:10, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Rao Mohar Singh Memorial Senior Secondary Public School concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rao Mohar Singh Memorial Senior Secondary Public School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! You created a thread called Need help about how and when to add or remove the tags ona Page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:10, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


Speedy deletion nomination of Franziska Meissner-Diemer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Franziska Meissner-Diemer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. buidhe 03:56, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Franziska Meissner-Diemer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Franziska Meissner-Diemer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. kingboyk (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks. Lightbluerain (talk) 17:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rao Mohar Singh Memorial Senior Secondary Public School

Hello, Lightbluerain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rao Mohar Singh Memorial Senior Secondary Public School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Lightbluerain! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:27, Wednesday, January 29, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! You created a thread called Writing on Draft:Franziska Meissner-Diemer at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


Welcome to the GOCE!

Hello Lightbluerain and welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE)! We are glad that you have decided to help us in our mission to improve the quality of writing on the English Wikipedia! Here are some links that you might find helpful to get started on your copy-editing journey!

You can help with copy-editing requests if you already have familiarity with the MOS and considerable English copy-editing skills, or start with articles tagged for copy editing to gain experience.

Thank you so much for joining the GOCE, we appreciate it!

For the GOCE, Puddleglum2.0 19:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC) 

Puddleglum2.0 19:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Push switch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2020 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2019. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2020, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Election results: There was little changeover in the roster of Guild Coordinators, with Miniapolis stepping down with distinction as a coordinator emeritus while Jonesey95 returned as lead coordinator. The next election is scheduled for June 2020 and all Wikipedians in good standing may participate.

January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work, completing 215 copy edits including 56 articles from the Requests page and 116 backlog articles from the target months of June to August 2019. At the conclusion of the drive there was a record low of 323 articles in the copy editing backlog. Of the 27 editors who signed up for the drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

February Blitz: Of the 15 editors who signed up for this one-week blitz, 13 completed at least one copy edit. A total of 32 articles were copy edited, evenly split between the twin goals of requests and the oldest articles from the copy-editing backlog. Full results are here.

March Drive: Currently underway, this event is targeting requests and backlog articles from September to November 2019. As of 18 March, the backlog stands at a record low of 253 articles and is expected to drop further as the drive progresses. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Help set a new record and sign up now!

Progress report: As of 18 March, GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests in 2020 and there was a net reduction of 385 articles from the copy-editing backlog – a 60% decrease from the beginning of the year. Well done and thank you everyone!

Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! You created a thread called One suggestion for the UI at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


Tag spraying

You are incorrectly accusing a whole pile of article of being promotional in nature. I think they are all incorrect and you need to remove them.  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

But, they all seemed promotional and not encyclopedic. Lightbluerain (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
User:Mr.choppers then in your opinion what should be done with them, if not to be deketed? Lightbluerain (talk) 16:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
The Rallycross articles and Hyundau Stellar are not in the least bit promotional. They could use more sources, for sure. I am not defending NE Talks and Vigyam Ashram, they do have some issues. But that tag is for blatantly promotional articles, like someone writing an article about their own pet grooming company or whathaveyou. Best,  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
"The Rallycross articles and Hyundau Stellar are not in the least bit promotional." i agree that they could use more sources, but they didn't seem encyclopedic to me, especially the Rallycross articles. I'm removing the tags but i'm not totally convinced yet. Lightbluerain (talk) 16:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
User:Mr.choppers, btw how to untag them? Lightbluerain (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
I think just deleting them. The rallycross articles are just results of various seasons of a championship, I don't see how you classify that as unencyclopaedic.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
"I think just deleting them." I don't think so. I think i should ask at the Teahouse. Lightbluerain (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Lightbluerain/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by MrClog (talk) 17:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! You created a thread called need help in removing speedy deletion tag at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


April 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm AaqibAnjum. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jamia Millia Islamia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:17, 15 April 2020 (UTC) @AaqibAnjum:, it was a copyedit on language issues. It was not a vandalism. Lightbluerain (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Lightbluerain, Sorry my err. But your copy editing the lead section changed the meaning of it completely. You are free to copy edit until it does not change the accurate meaning. Your copy edit to History section was good. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
@AaqibAnjum: but the line "the reason behind..." and "a number of students left..." seems same, so i merged the both. Lightbluerain (talk) 18:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
@AaqibAnjum: I genuinely wanted your opinion Lightbluerain (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Lightbluerain, I've merged the sentences to keep them meaningful at the sametime. Please proceed with copy editing the article. I've loads of assignment works to do, but I've thought to fix this article asap. I may require your help in copy editing the same. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Sure. Thanks. Lightbluerain (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Some doubts, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Lightbluerain/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Hillelfrei• talk • 17:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Buddha's Birthday/Vesak Merge

I've created a new discussion on Talk:Buddha's Birthday to discuss your merger proposal- I think it's a little confusing posting it under an old section heading from so many years ago. --Spasemunki (talk) 11:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Alright. Thanks. Lightbluerain (talk) 12:30, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to verify whether it is a reliable source or not, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello

I have added some sources to the article probably meeting the G. N also work on its neutrality if any problem you can talk me Easytostable (talk) 03:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

@Easytostable: Alright, go on. Just make sure you use reliable sources for the article. Take a look at the linked page, if you hadn't already. Regards. Lightbluerain (talk) 08:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

You are doing a really very good work in editing.

Keep doing such good works. God bless you. Raji Majji (talk) 15:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. ☺️ You're also doing good editing. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 15:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franziska Meissner-Diemer has been accepted

Franziska Meissner-Diemer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 16:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Lightbluerain! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, subpages, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2020 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2020. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. All times and dates stated are in UTC.

Current events

Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 00:01 on 16 June. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, or you know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

June Blitz: This blitz begins at 00:01 on 14 June and ends at 23:59 on 20 June, with themes of articles tagged for copyedit in May 2020 and requests.

Drive and blitz reports

March Drive: Self-isolation from coronavirus may have played a hand in making this one of our most successful backlog elimination drives. The copy-editing backlog was reduced from 477 to a record low of 118 articles, a 75% reduction. The last four months of 2019 were cleared, reducing the backlog to three months. Fifty requests were also completed, and the total word count of copy-edited articles was 759,945. Of the 29 editors who signed up, 22 completed at least one copy edit. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

April Blitz: This blitz ran from 12 to 18 April with a theme of Indian military history. Of the 18 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed a total of 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

May Drive: This event marked the 10th anniversary of the GOCE's copy-editing drives, and set a goal of diminishing the backlog to just one month of articles, as close to zero articles as possible. We achieved the goal of eliminating all articles that had been tagged prior to the start of the drive, for the first time in our history! Of the 51 editors who signed up, 43 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

Progress report: as of 2 June, GOCE participants had processed 328 requests since 1 January, which puts us on pace to exceed any previous year's number of requests. As of the end of the May drive, the backlog stood at just 156 articles, all tagged in May 2020.

Outreach: To mark the 10th anniversary of our first Backlog Elimination Drive, The Signpost contributor and GOCE participant Puddleglum2.0 interviewed project coordinators and copy-editors for the journal's April WikiProject Report. The Drive and the current Election of Coordinators have also been covered in The Signpost's May News and Notes page.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).

Ways to improve Bhutanese literature

Hello, Lightbluerain,

Thank you for creating Bhutanese literature.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You will probably find that literature in Bhutan extends back before 1950, into antiquity, as the Gyeltshen source talks about. I would perhaps re-write the lede so it contains less generalizations. Regards, Zindor (talk) 12:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Zindor}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2020.

                 Current and upcoming events

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Election reminder: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 December. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

Drive and Blitz reports

June Blitz: An uncorrected typo (even copy editors make copy editing mistakes!) led to an eight-day "leap blitz" from 14 to 21 June, focusing on requests and articles tagged in May. 19 participating editors claimed 54 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: Over 750,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event, keeping pace with the previous three self-isolated drives. Of the 38 people who signed up, 30 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 16 to 22 August, we copy edited articles tagged in June and July 2020 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 37 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Baffle gab1978, Tdslk, Twofingered Typist, and first-time coordinator Puddleglum2.0. Reidgreg took a break after serving for a couple years. Thanks to everyone who participated!

Progress report: As of 01:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 532 requests since 1 January and there were 38 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Golden Clayton has been accepted

Grace Golden Clayton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 02:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Help needed

Namastey, As an Indian, you know that this article Netaji Jayanti is a crucial one. we, from PM to mass, celebrate it in India honouring Netaji. But on this article notability tag was fixed by someone unknowingly. Could you remove it attempting proper steps. Wikifulness (talk) 18:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

??? Thanks... Wikifulness (talk) 18:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Error correction: Could you fix it attempting proper steps? Wikifulness (talk) 02:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikifulness, Hey, I know the event is notable. I think the problem is that this article doesn't use much of the reliable sources available online. Let me try using them. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Btw, there is no problem with having a tag on the page. It is normal and is meant to encourage improvements on the article. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks Wikifulness (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your special attention here. Wikifulness (talk) 03:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2020 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2020.

                 Current and upcoming events

Election time: our end-of-year Election of Coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before Auld Lang Syne. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

December Blitz: This will run from 13 to 19 December, and will target all Requests. Sign up now.

Drive and Blitz reports

September Drive: 67 fewer articles had copy-edit templates by this month's close. Of the 27 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and 124 articles were claimed for the drive.

October Blitz: this ran from 18 to 24 October, and focused on articles tagged for copy-edit in July and August 2020, and all Requests. Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors copy-edited at least one article. 21 articles were claimed for the blitz.

November Drive: Of the 18 editors who signed up, 15 copy-edited at least one article, and together claimed 134 articles. At the close of the drive, 67 fewer articles were in the backlog and we had dealt with 39 requests.

Other news

Progress report: As of 09:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 663 requests (18 from 2019) since 1 January and there were 52 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 494 (see monthly progress graph above).

Annual Report for 2020: this roundup of the year's activity at the Guild is planned for publication in late January or early February.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Seasonal tidings and cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Puddleglum2.0, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Why the removal of citations at Khidr

Calling them unnecessary didn't explain anything. Doug Weller talk 19:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Doug Weller, I was typing the whole edit summary when I accidentally hit enter and that incomplete (and full of typos) edit summary got posted. Then, I didn't write edit summary for the next edit as well. I left a message on the talk page of Khidr as well. The lead section of Khidr has unusually many citations. And, there are several citations (I think one would go better if it has to have a reference in the lead) to a few statements in the lead. That raises suspect that some of them may be spam. So, I removed a few citations from the lead. I was trying to put the rest in the below sections but right now I didn't see where to put them. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 02:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Doug Weller Can I keep on removing them now? Or, do you have any other opinion? Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 08:55, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
A script that I have highlights citations 2, 12, 70, 81 and 87 preprints or general repository which may or may contain unpublished or predatory material. All by the same person who also wrote a book on Nostradamus and some sort of Kurdish prophecy. Amazon summarises it thus: "Those whose historical consciousness has been dulled can neither correctly interpret the present nor construct their future for themselves as much as they cannot grasp their past; because people grasp the present and establish ties with the future in accordance with their past and their mental relations with it. Likewise, they read their past through their relationship with their present. For this reason, the oppressed in general, especially the colonial nations, are tried to 'dehistory' and their past is presented to them as an unreal story, today a fate and a future as a fate.
The past, present and future of the Kurdistan problem can thus neither be attributed to these stories and fatalistic conceptions nor to prophecies. However, it may be wondered whether some quatrains of the famous oracle Nostradamus have been interpreted so far as to the Kurds and their future, even if speculatively. The book not only focuses on this popular curiosity but also examines some of the claims about Kurdish and Turkish (Kemalist) nationalism and the effects of the Russian revolution on the process of Kurdistan's sharing. More importantly, this study examines the relationship between the possible intellectual tendencies of the Kurds and their national future, as well as Öcalan and the PKK, which have been transformed into a national 'destiny' for some of them."
Probably spam and not a reliable source in any case.
20 is a good source but doesn't seem to back the text, it would also need a proper citation with page number and NOT the link which may be copyvio.
There's a lot of Aksoy stuff, including the astrology, all written in some edits at this time[1] by this editor.[2]. I'd remove all of it as unsafe.
I'd certainly remove the citation to the Qu'ran I restored, and also 11. I don't want to edit it right now as it will mess up the citation numbers. Doug Weller talk 11:29, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Doug Weller, Great! I also want to contribute.
And, I was also thinking of writing another section (if need be) titled something like Description where we can add appropriate details from the lead with citations so we don't have to keep citations in the lead summary. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 12:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Doug Weller, can I remove the citations you mentioned? Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
@Lightbluerain: oops, forgot to reply, sorry. Sure. Doug Weller talk 10:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Doug Weller, I removed the citations you mentioned and am trying to clean it up more. I had a doubt: in the line "Though not mentioned by name in the Quran, he is named by Islamic scholars as the figure described in Quran 18:65–82 as a servant of God ..." in the lead, the verses of Quran give link to this site. Why? Is it correct? or, any mistake? Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:22, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pooja Sund (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 15:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

User page

Hi I made your user page a little different and more tidy in my opinion. Revert if you think I made it worse. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 16:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

TigerScientist, thanks a lot. You truly fixed it. It looks quite better now. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:09, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Lightbluerain I changed it again you can revert if needed. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
TigerScientist, it looks even better now, thanks a lot. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Always here to help another fellow editor! TigerScientist Chat > contribs 17:45, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box.

Current events

Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here.

June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June.

Drive and blitz reports

January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results)

February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results)

March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results)

April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results)

May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results)

Other news

Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

Concern regarding Draft:Pooja Sund

Information icon Hello, Lightbluerain. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pooja Sund, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2021 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2021.

                 Current and upcoming events

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Drive and Blitz reports

June Blitz: From 20 to 26 June, 6 participating editors claimed 16 copy edits, focusing on requests and articles tagged in March and April. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: Almost 575,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 24 people who signed up, 18 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 15 to 21 August, we copy edited articles tagged in April and May 2021 and requests. 9 participating editors completed 17 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Other news

June election: Jonesey95 was chosen to continue as lead coordinator, assisted by Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

New maintenance template added to our project scope: After a short discussion in June, we added {{cleanup tense}} to the list of maintenance templates that adds articles to the Guild's copy editing backlog categories. This change added 198 articles, spread over 97 months of backlog, to our queue. We processed all of those articles except for those from the three or four most recent months during the July backlog elimination drive (Here's a link to a "tense" discussion during the drive).

Progress report: As of 18:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 468 requests since 1 January and there were 60 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog of articles tagged for copy-editing stood at 433 (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

thanks Souri sachin Senapati28 (talk) 07:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pooja Sund

Hello, Lightbluerain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pooja Sund".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Viewing a page

Hi, I made the Draft:Battle of Pweto, I made it as a redirect to the page called Pweto, it has a section talking about the battle. I do not want to copy and paste the section. Thanks BruhOfficial (talk) 17:19, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

@BruhOfficial, if that is a redirect, it doesn't have to be in a draft. You can straightaway create a redirect page and a new page patroller would patrol the page. You can read the linked page to know more about how to create a redirect. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Also, you can create a redirect using WP:Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects that's linked in the draft page you sent here. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:33, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • It says that the article needs to exist, so I can't do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruhOfficial (talk • contribs) 17:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Depressed Anonymous

It smelled like a copyvio, and is one, of the orgs web site FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 22:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

@Timtrent:, I didn't check it so deep. I apologize for it. And, thanks for informing. I will take care of it from now on. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Not blaming you at all. We all learn from others. We all miss stuff. I guarantee to make huge mistakes for ever! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 17:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Nokhar

Why you removed all things that I wrote about my village Nokhar 182.186.181.48 (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello and Welcome IP, I believe they may be very true, but we need reliable sources for such things so that we may verify the authenticiy of the information. Thanks for your edits. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 19:04, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021.

                 Current and upcoming events

Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now!

Drive and Blitz reports

September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here.

Other news

It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community.

Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Request on 06:40:58, 14 December 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Prashant.angre2010


Hi,

I am Prashant, an Indian. Can you help me out for resubmission for page of Sachin Mote. He is a prominent script writer and producer of Marathi Plays & movies. I tried twice for submission of this page but failed.

Can you suggest if any changes are there?

Thanks & regards

Prashant.angre2010 (talk) 06:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

@Prashant.angre2010, the draft seems very much close to being accepted to me. The only issue I see in it is lack of reliable sources. In its current state, I see majority of sources are not reliable. To me working on finding better sources (the hardest part in getting it accepted) to establish its notability seems the only thing needed. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
There are some formatting issues as well. But, they are not much of a problem. I'll do them for you once I get a little free time. So, you can work on finding more reliable sources now.
Regards Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 17:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your support & suggestions Prashant.angre2010 (talk) 17:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Welcome and thanks for the Barnstar. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You did not get a response to this question and I wouldn't know the answer. Did you find the answer somewhere else?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

@Vchimpanzee:, although I didn't get any answer to the question, I think, the code being on Wikipedia, like articles, can be usex without permission but only attribition. That's why I didn't ask the question again. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 19:06, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Xxxx-larger

Template:Xxxx-larger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFXtalk 17:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naveen Jaihind (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ts12rActalk to me 04:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Features for new users coming soon (and mentors, like you, wanted!)

Hello. As you're currently listed as a host at the Teahouse, I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

  • Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
  • There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
  • Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via a Your mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences.

Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 14:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Hegen

Hello, I'd like to understand more about why my article draft was rejected? As far as I could, my facts have been obtained from neutral sources, many of them national newspapers, as far as possible. All my facts and assertions are referenced, and I took care not to draw any material from the brand's own materials as required by guidelines. An article about a brand's activities, products and services will inevitably have to talk about its achievements and innovations. Would you be able to point exactly which parts "sound like an advertisement"?

I'd like to point out that I have no commercial relationship with the brand; I'm simply a father who has been very impressed with this brand of baby products that my wife and son are using and was surprised to see it did not have any information about it on Wikipedia. 165.173.19.158 Andretan1985 (talk) 00:40, 5 March 2022 (UTC) 18:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Andretan1985, specifically the end part of the draft still seems to me having an advertising tone. If you feel like I made a mistake, you can always resubmit your draft with the small blue button inside the red box, and any other editor might better judge your submission. Thanks. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 17:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your reply. I've posted an enquiry about this in the general enquiry area and gotten more specific insights about what exactly needs changing. I'm making some edits and will resubmit soon. Thanks again! Andretan1985 (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lightbluerain/Archive_1&oldid=1078804253"