User talk:Kuching7102

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kuching7102, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Kuching7102! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

2017 Camp Shaheen attack[edit]

This edit copied an entire paragraph from this article. This is a copyright violation, and is very much not acceptable. Please don't copy text straight into articles in the future; you have to rewrite the content into your own words. The Wicked Twisted Road (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2017 Camp Shaheen attack[edit]

On 25 April 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 Camp Shaheen attack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. BencherliteTalk 09:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Subhi al-Badri al-Samerai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I also found copyright violations on Al-Bu Badri tribe. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kuching7102. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Baraa Kadek, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 16:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baraa Kadek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baraa Kadek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baraa Kadek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 10:17, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scott Guggenheim for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Guggenheim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Guggenheim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdul-Sattar al-Badri for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul-Sattar al-Badri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul-Sattar al-Badri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 16:09, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Talib al-Tamimi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Talib al-Tamimi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Talib al-Tamimi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 16:13, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abd al-Aziz al-Badri for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abd al-Aziz al-Badri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abd al-Aziz al-Badri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of For Allah, then for history for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article For Allah, then for history is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Allah, then for history until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 21:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Subhi al-Badri al-Samerai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhi al-Badri al-Samerai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhi al-Badri al-Samerai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 21:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kuching7102, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:09, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tonle Bassac[edit]

Hi Kuching7102.

I see you wrote a new article at Tonle Bassac. Thanks.

I have reverted you edits there, because it is an ambiguous title, that name already refers to the river itself, and becuase your new article should have a clean edit history. I recommend that you re-create the article at Tonle Bassac (commune).

I could do this for you, but it is better for you to do it with your account so that you are recorded as the creator and author of the new page. Is that OK? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I recreated with the title you suggested. Thanks.Kuching7102 (talk) 21:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kuching7102. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Grid-style social management has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing.Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kim Jong-il's parka) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Kim Jong-il's parka, Kuching7102!

Wikipedia editor Galobtter just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Sorry, there doesn't seem to be enough coverage (only two sentences in each source) which is not enough for notability so I've redirected it to the article on Kim jong-il which does mention the parka.

To reply, leave a comment on Galobtter's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fengqiao Experience requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://chinamediaproject.org/2013/10/17/xi-jinping-playing-with-fire/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kuching7102 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Because the article 'Fengqiao experience' is not in fact a copyright violation, rather it is close paraphrasing, which according to Wikipedia guidelines is permitted in the cases of 'limited quotation' (nearly all of the so-called 'copyright violations' on the page Fengqiao experience are in fact quotes) and 'when there is a limited number of ways to say the same thing'. I made extensive efforts to rewrite the source material in my own words. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing#When_is_close_paraphrasing_permitted?

Decline reason:

You made extensive efforts to string quotes together. That's not acceptable from a copyright perspective. Don't copy-paste, summarize in your own words. Huon (talk) 12:21, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Kuching7102. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ibrahim Abu Thuraya, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kuching7102. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Abdullah Ahmed al-Mashhadani, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ibrahim Abu Thuraya[edit]

Hello, Kuching7102,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ibrahim Abu Thuraya should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Abu Thuraya .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Icewhiz (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Doundou Chefou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

as it says in the sources he was a "mid-ranking commander called Doundou Chefou who was recruiting disgruntled youths from the Fulani ethnic group along Niger-Mali border" fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Grid-style social management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://chinachange.org/2013/08/08/the-urban-grid-management-and-police-state-in-china-a-brief-overview/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 07:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]