User talk:Ks0stm/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

Motion: Activity

In accordance with the standing procedure on inactivity, the checkuser permissions of:

and the oversight permissions of:

are removed. The committee thanks them for their many years of service. For the Arbitration Committee, --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 18:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting: AGK, Courcelles, Doug Weller, Euryalus, GorillaWarfare, Guerillero, LFaraone, NativeForeigner, Roger Davies, Thryduulf
Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Motion: Activity

WikiCup 2015 September newsletter

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Scotland Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Philadelphia Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

  1. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
  2. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
  3. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
  4. Somerset Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
  5. Washington, D.C. West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.
  6. Somerset Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
  7. United States Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
  8. England Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Summer 2015

Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

The Center Line: September 2015

The Center Line
Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 • About the Newsletter

Happy 10th Anniversary!
—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

WikiCup 2015: The results

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to United States Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Center Line: November 2015

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

fyi

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_ARBPIA NE Ent 01:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, here you are


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

Huldra (talk) 03:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...aaaah, that felt gooooood! Huldra (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to join a debate for James Stunt

@Ks0stm: I'm requesting you to join this Afd discussion. Your comment is valuable to us. Please help us reach a consensus. Thanks -Khocon (talk) 19:40, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Khocon: Why me? I don't recall having anything to do with this article. Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are a dedicated wiki volunteer that's why. I'm wondering, If you have time you could stop by there with your honest opinion. -Khocon (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism by "Brandon"

Successors to User:BrandonRuanoAlvarez7151977, User:BrandonRuan77 and User:BrandonBarnes715: User:BrandonBarnes77 and 2607:FB90:218C:AC98:0:B:795B:9501. Robby.is.on (talk) 04:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: I'll take a look at this in a second, but just on face value they (or at least the usernames) quack. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Saw the SPI. Thanks for going after this. Robby.is.on (talk) 00:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
He's back (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/AlexVarkatzas11782)? :-/ Robby.is.on (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Robby.is.on: Sorry for the delay, but it appears User:Materialscientist handled it. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, indeed. Thanks! :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Could you have another look at your protection on this, I think the edit count is too high for PC at the moment. GedUK  12:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ged UK: I upped it to semi for 82 hours (which if my math is correct should take it through close of business Friday). If the Giants haven't made it official by then I can extend it longer. I also extended pending changes to expire a week from now, just in case. Ks0stm (TCGE) 14:19, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Quest!

Edit Quest!
Titusfox has requested that you join them for an afternoon of questing, slaying and looting at Edit Quest, the Wikipedia Based RPG! I Hope to see you there! TF { Contribs } { Edit Quest! } 13:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Regarding "wickwack", Jayron tells me that that was just one of many fake signatures he used for IP's. He was never a registered user, and I suppose they banned him under that name because it was easy to remember. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 17:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Baseball Bugs: Gotcha. Well, I wasn't sure how long of a block to do, so I just went with the customary 31 hours for a first block of an IP. Unfortunately, since there are no accounts attached I can't exactly kick it over to checkuser for a range block or long term {{checkuserblock}}, but if there's somewhere you guys keep track of this guy I'd be happy to log it there. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In general, they've been blocking that troll for the usual time, such as 31 or 48 or up to a week. He's an IP-hopper, so a lengthy block is not useful. A short block at least makes him work at it a little bit. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

Merry Christmas, Ks0stm

And may all your days be merry and bright . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Danke sehr! And your's too! Ks0stm (TCGE) 20:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GUAM

I changed the section with the official language of the organization, providing the reference to the official charter (http://guam-organization.org/en/node/450). Why have you protected the returnend version, containing wrong information that english is the only official language of the organization? And why do in original names is a ukrainian one? Ukrainian is not an official language. 80.250.56.174 (talk) 07:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because I protected The Wrong Version. I've had a look at your source and it appears you are correct that Russian is still an official language, but a consensus needs to be hacked out on the talk page since there is more than just the official language of the organization that's being edit warred over. If necessary, file a request for comment to get a consensus of uninvolved editors; I'll be more than happy to comment in one if you decide to start one.
Also, as a side note, if I were you, I would recommend creating an account to avoid some of the issues that come with using an IP (it's oftentimes liable to change, {{re}} doesn't work, some registered users are (unfortunately) less likely to assume good faith towards you in situations like this, etc), but you don't have to if you don't want to. Ks0stm (TCGE) 17:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You protected this talk page and suggested that a separate talk page be set up of unconfirmed editors here. It'd a bit moot now since the protection is almost over, but no-one did it, and it's apparent from the thread that the need for doing so was not understood by everyone. In case I ever run across this situation again, which template is appropriate? I was unable to find one. Meters (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters: To be honest, I have no idea. I went looking for a template and I couldn't find one. The only precedent I know of for a separate talk page is for user talk pages, per WP:PROT#User talk pages, but I figure if extended semi-protection is needed for a talk page a similar setup should be used. Ks0stm (TCGE) 08:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Since there doesn't seem to be a template if I ever see this again I'll just create the page and leave a note on the main talk page. Meters (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 December 2015