User talk:Jdavi333/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Orphaned non-free image File:2015 Pro Bowl Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2015 Pro Bowl Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:18, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jdavi333. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! —Bagumba (talk) 09:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

NBC Nightly News edit

Hello. Regarding your edit to the NBC Nightly News article, I have removed it. I mentioned in the revert to "see the talk page". I mentioned there as to why she cannot be added to the article stating she is the "Interim" anchor of the weekend newscasts. Thanks, Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 16:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Not TV Guide

Hi there, I've reverted your recent edits at 87th Academy Awards. It's nothing personal. Wikipedia is not a TV guide and we don't need precise times in the article as has been discussed by WikiProject Television numerous times over the years. The |date= parameter is intended to be used with a date, not a time. If you disagree, you can always raise the question at WT:TV. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Same goes for the 69th Tony Awards article. I've removed the time from that field. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 00:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Jimmy Fallon. The policy on not biting newbies applies here. We want to keep editors -- especially new editors -- not scare or discourage them away. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 36th Sports Emmy Awards

Hello Jdavi333,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 36th Sports Emmy Awards for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Danielj2705 (talk) 23:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello, I'm Spanneraol. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:87th Academy Awards because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Spanneraol (talk) 02:29, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (soundtrack)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (soundtrack), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bing.com/knows/music%20of%20the%20hobbit%20film%20series?mkt=zh-cn.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:50, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Music of The Hobbit film series with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover ^(Talk) 06:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Kenny Easley.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kenny Easley.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyvio image

The image on the Floyd Mayweather, Jr. vs. Manny Pacquiao article is a copyright violation that will shortly be deleted from Wikipedia. So there really is no point in keeping it in the article. All that will be left is an ugly red link. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 00:03, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

About Template:Current sport

Hi there. Please note that Template:Current sport#Guidelines states, among others, that (emphasis added):

"This template is for articles which involve an article about an evolving current sports-related event which is either changing rapidly or about which understanding is rapidly evolving"
Note that every article on Wikipedia has a General disclaimer indicating that the article contents may not be accurate. As such, this template is redundant.
"It is not intended to be used to mark an article that merely has recent news articles about the topic, or for some team or league that is in season. If it were, thousands of articles would have this template, without informational consequence.

In other words, Template:Current sport should be used during periods of rapid editing when games are going on. It is not meant as 24-hour/7-day General disclaimer that is constantly on an article like 2015 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament for three weeks --- especially when you have at least three days per week (Monday to Wednesday) when there are no games. I'm permitted to remove the tag when the article has not been updated for several hours (like 2015 NCAA Women's Division I Basketball Tournament, when its page history indicates that you and I were the only ones who edited that page in the last 24 hours). Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 09:27, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jimmy Valvano.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jimmy Valvano.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 19:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:FN FNS 40 LS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FN FNS 40 LS.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 19:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Interested??

Saw your edits and wondered if you'd be interested in using the 2014 articles to whip up the basic pre-event articles for 2015 Preakness Stakes and 2015 Belmont Stakes. Someone else has already done 2015 Kentucky Derby and I simply haven't the time to focus on these particular article creation projects. Just wondering if you'd like to help? Thanks! Montanabw ^(talk) 23:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

B2project

Hello, Jdavi333. You have new messages at B2project's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2015 Baltimore Orioles season

I un-capitalized "log" in "Game log" because it's not a proper noun. Why did you revert it? --A guy saved by Jesus (talk) 02:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm SMP0328.. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Barack Obama because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SMP0328. (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

2016 French Open listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2016 French Open. Since you had some involvement with the 2016 French Open redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 333 -blue 12:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please do not PROD the article. 333 -blue 12:10, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2016 French Open

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2016 French Open requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Si Trew (talk) 04:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DemocraticLuntz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to 2015 Baltimore protests because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. DemocraticLuntz (talk) 02:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2015 Baltimore protests. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 02:15, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

If you redirect again against consensus, expect to be blocked for disruptive editing. Soapboxing on the talkpage is also disruptive. Acroterion (talk) 02:17, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at United States presidential election, 2016. Please do not make editing decisions in articles based on your personal opinion of the subjects. —C.Fred (talk) 17:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Baltimore logo

Feel free to continue the discussion here (see below as well). Canuck^{89 (talk to me)} 00:08, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of 2016 PGA Championship

Hello, Jdavi333. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2016 PGA Championship, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 Open Championship

Hello, Jdavi333. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2016 Open Championship, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 19:26, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 U.S. Open (golf)

Hello, Jdavi333. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2016 U.S. Open (golf), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Current sport again

Again, please note that Template:Current sport#Guidelines states, among others, that (emphasis added):

"This template is for articles which involve an article about an evolving current sports-related event which is either changing rapidly or about which understanding is rapidly evolving"
Note that every article on Wikipedia has a General disclaimer indicating that the article contents may not be accurate. As such, this template is redundant.
"It is not intended to be used to mark an article that merely has recent news articles about the topic, or for some team or league that is in season. If it were, thousands of articles would have this template, without informational consequence.

In other words, Template:Current sport should be used during periods of rapid editing when games are going on. It is not meant as 24-hour/7-day General disclaimer that is constantly on an article like 2015 Wimbledon Championships. I'm permitted to remove the tag when the article has not been updated for several hours. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Baltimore Orioles HTML colors

Hello, I'm responding to your message on my talk page. MLB.com says the official HTML colors for the Baltimore Orioles' orange is #DF4601. I have seen the Arc90.com website. I don't know if the colors are accurate, since they claim they are approximations, as seen here. My source for the colors is seen here. I also found this image and used the eyedropper tool in MS Paint to try to identify what the color was. There's a talk page on Wikipedia (WT:WikiProject Baseball) if you would like to continue this discussion. Thank you. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

???

Does this edit really matter? It makes no difference whether it is #FFFFFF or white and whether or not the hex code is at the end or beginning. I'd like to know you reason for the edit, please. Corkythehornetfan 00:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

I just think that it makes everything easier if the formatting is uniform throughout. Jdavi333 (talk) 02:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Miles (priest)

The article Mark Miles (priest) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Osarius - Want a chat? 15:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

MLB Wild Card

Seriously? Okay, whatever. Doesn't matter anyway because after today it isn't needed anymore.

Images

Don't delete images from articles when they are relevant to the article such as the one on the 2015 Baltimore Orioles season. If you feel that the image should be placed somewhere else on the article, then move it. Thanks! Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 01:46, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Mark Miles (priest) & 2015 MLB Postseason

Jdavi333: Just made a minor edit to your "Mark Miles (priest)" and want to thank you for providing references which appear to have staved off the proposed deletion of your brief though otherwise excellent article regarding Father Miles. Also, congratulations on your outstanding "2015 MLB Postseason." Well done. It is now my "go to" page for this year's MLB playoffs. Dave Peters (talk) 17:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks. Jdavi333 (talk) 18:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome, and I beg your pardon - I see now that it's Monsignor Miles, not Father Miles. Dave Peters (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Copy-paste move of Mark Miles

OK, so I just spent the last hour or so cleaning up the copy-paste move you made of the content from Mark Miles (priest) to Mark Miles. Please use the move function rather than copy and pasting as copy and pasting breaks attribution. If there is an article or redirect in the way, as was the case here, try contacting an administrator for help or going to requested moves. Thanks. –Grondemar 05:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

MOS

Please read MOS:BOLDTITLE. Links aren't allowed in bolded titles. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Jdavi333 (talk) 12:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

2016 Wimbledon Championships listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2016 Wimbledon Championships. Since you had some involvement with the 2016 Wimbledon Championships redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 333 -blue 04:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

2016 US Open (tennis) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2016 US Open (tennis). Since you had some involvement with the 2016 US Open (tennis) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 333 -blue 04:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Rachel-platten-stand-by-you-cover.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Rachel-platten-stand-by-you-cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stand by You (Rachel Platten song)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Stand by You (Rachel Platten song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Xx236 (talk) 06:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

pending changes reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katie^talk 01:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Rollbacker

I granted your rollbacker request. Please remember that rollback is meant for unambiguous vandalism, not for possible good-faith edits. Cheers, bibliomaniac 1 5 08:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Your addition to Chicago Fire (season 4) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 08:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at Code Black (TV series). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Content found in this edit can be found here and here and here. Not sure what was confusing about the previous warnings to not submit copyrighted content, but in case you think you're helping the project, you are not, you are harming it with stolen content. Cut it out. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Code Black (TV series)

Hi there, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. I don't understand your rationale for the restoration of the title card quote here. You said, I was to show the same drama shown in the title card in the article as well This explanation doesn't make sense to me. We already have a coherent, brief summary that doesn't needlessly incorporate copyrighted prose, and it's clear from the previous warnings on your talk page that you don't seem to understand why we should avoid lifted content. The condensed summary I provided reads, The show centers on the fictional Angels Memorial Hospital, where four first-year residents and their colleagues must tend to patients in an understaffed, busy emergency room that lacks sufficient resources. We've summarized all the salient points without being mouthpieces for the series. Please note that per WP:BRD, when you are reverted, you need to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for inclusion, not resubmit the content. If you choose to reply, please do so here. I've added your talk page to my watchlist. Thanks, but please note that another disruption will result in another interruption of your editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hi, thank you for your edit to Kobe Bryant; unfortunately, it had to be removed. Per template:Infobox basketball biography, number= is for "The person's current jersey number." —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 🖖 00:57, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

This edit, on the other hand is correct. Thank you, and happy editing! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 🖖 06:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baltimore Ravens may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

13–10 at [[LP Field]] on a [[Matt Stover]] field goal with 53 seconds left in regulation time.<ref>[http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=290110010&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines "

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

AFC Standings

My bad on that your right. I had a brain fart. I spaced that 3 way ties work differently. Head to head would be used if the Chiefs had played them both but since they didn't conference record is used.--Rockchalk717 07:05, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.