User talk:Iamgauravkumar
|
The article Naam Hai Boss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:TOOSOON. Duplicate article at Boss (2013 film) deleted at afd.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
AAP[edit]
We need sources to state that those are candidates. And if the only source is the party website, then we probably shouldn't include them, as we're only interested in people/events/things that are important enough to have been mentioned in independent, reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- @Qwyrxian: I disagree with you on this. We are not creating wikipedia article on people who are declared candidates. We are just including the information about Aam Aadmi Party's declared candidates for
2013 Delhi Assembly Elections. Following are other links where candidate list is included even if candidates are not well known https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Iowa,_2014 Sam Clovis,Paul Lunde,Scott Schaben,David Young any many more are not well known but still included as candidates.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_Nebraska,_2014 Sid Dinsdale,Bart McLeay,John Haltom,Charles Herbster etc. are not famous but still find mention in different candidates category.Search for 2014 elections in wikipedia & you will find at least 10 more elections where candidates are mentioned irrespective of their status.--ratastro (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Aam Aadmi Party. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Comedy Nights with Kapil[edit]
Thinking of adding a column to the <<guest on the show>> table itself for youtube links instead of different section; making page more aesthetic and precise.
Please share your view..!!
okey. Thanks
--GIZMOFY (talk) 20:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Delhi state assembly elections, 2013". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 12:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Palam metro station[edit]
Hello Iamgauravkumar,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Palam metro station for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhona43 (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Renaming pages[edit]
In the future, instead of recreating the page, you can move/rename them. This prevents duplicate pages. I went ahead and tagged your old one for deletion. If that isn't what you want, you can replace it with a redirect. Cheers! ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Chief Minister of Delhi into Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 18:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: this might have been a mistake, but you didn't actually add attribution on Talk:Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi. I have added it now, though.
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 11:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)- Hi SshibumXZ. Adding a template to the article talk page is optional; what's mandatory is the edit summary, which I did here. Please see WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Diannaa! I was always under the impression that if attribution isn't provided in the edit through the main edit, the {{copied}} template had to be added to the target article's talk page. Turns out, I was wrong; thanks a ton for clarifying!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 15:38, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Diannaa! I was always under the impression that if attribution isn't provided in the edit through the main edit, the {{copied}} template had to be added to the target article's talk page. Turns out, I was wrong; thanks a ton for clarifying!
- Hi SshibumXZ. Adding a template to the article talk page is optional; what's mandatory is the edit summary, which I did here. Please see WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
AAP and wiki[edit]
Sir, Why are u using Wikipedia as a party platform. Social media provides that for everyone. Wikipedia should remain fact based and not become a party propaganda place. Hope, u understand my point. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.91.230.10 (talk) 12:51, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Crack (film)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Crack (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hitro talk 11:13, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Crack 2017 Film.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Crack 2017 Film.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Crack (film) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crack (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crack (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Recent edit to Ranvir Sena[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Marvellous Spider-Man 08:52, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
August 2016[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Ranvir Sena. Marvellous Spider-Man 09:40, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crack 2017 Film.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Crack 2017 Film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Iamgauravkumar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Myntra.com Screenshot June 2016.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Myntra.com Screenshot June 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Iamgauravkumar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
April 2018[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vistara, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 06:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
September 2018[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Chief Ministers of Delhi into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 11:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Iamgauravkumar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)