Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crack (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Neeraj Pandey. MBisanz talk 12:21, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Crack (film)[edit]

Crack (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Today it was announced that this movie might be made. Fails notability of movies. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now. This was announced, but it's far far WP:TOOSOON for this to have an article. The thing with films is that it's quite common for them to be postponed, cancelled, or otherwise have something happen that would negatively impact the movie at this stage of the game, so I'm hesitant at this even redirecting to the director's article, although that is a possibility. We can't even guarantee that the title would remain the same, as the director's film Special 26 was originally called Special Chabbis. Even the most certain project can falter and never get made. If someone wants to userfy this then I have no problem with that, but it's just too soon for this to warrant an article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 02:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect - per WP:NFF for now to either director of the actor's page. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 05:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Definitely WP:TOOSOON as it was announced that the movie might be made and not enough coverage to warrant an entry or establish notability. -- Dane2007 talk 19:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.