User talk:HugoAcosta9

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 20:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

They are deleting my 200 articles based on false claims and I cannot defend myself. Three users are playing with an entire system, I thought it was my fault, but then I realized the Gang of Three targeted more articles day after day. I must recognize the banner, giantsnowman and mississippi star could cheat and laugh at the wikipedia entire page. But they did not cheat on me, I've realized its game, I discovered and I showed to the public. The outcome was expected, users dodge the real question about being cheated with AfD with 1-0 votes, fake discussions and of course the joke of deletion review, the gang of three was discovered by me, they are cheating every time. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

You could have, but you weren't "defending yourself", or discussing notability standards, you were spending all your time insulting anyone who disagreed with you. You even started at me, and I didn't even participate in the discussions, and openly stated I was neutral because I don't edit sports related articles enough to know if things meet the Wikipedia standards or not. You refused to discuss constructively about the articles, and your comments were getting in the way of people who actually wanted to discuss the articles themselves, so another admin (not me) blocked you. You can always put in an WP:UNBLOCK request, but if you just do one where all you do is complain about other editors, it's unlikely that any other admin are going to unblock you. Sergecross73 msg me 20:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

False. I naïvely followed the AfD process over my 18 articles, it was a joke, 1-0 even they are laughing now how I was showed the sources, explained them one by one and then they simply deleted them. Those three friendos are the worst experience over three years writing on wikipedia. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 20:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

I wasn't commenting on that, I was commenting on the reason for your block and your complaint that you could no longer "defend yourself". Sergecross73 msg me 20:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

You said creators are not essential on wikipedia. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

No, I said "article creators participating in AFDs for articles they created is not essential" when someone asked what happens with the AFDs for the articles you create after they saw you were indefinitely blocked. Not sure if you struggle with reading comprehension or are purposefully twisting what I said, but this is exactly the sort of thing that got you in trouble in the first place. If it's just going to be more bad faith accusations from you, I won't be responding further. I did not block you or delete your article, you have no reason to be mad at me. Sergecross73 msg me 21:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

You are not ready to discuss the unfair process to delete my 200 articles it was a 1-0 vote on a two weeks discussion AfD, maybe you have your gang too. Three users are playing with an entire system, I thought it was my fault, but then I realized the Gang of Three targeted more articles day after day. I must recognize the banner, giantsnowman and mississippi star could cheat and laugh at the wikipedia entire page. But they did not cheat on me, I've realized its game, I discovered and I showed to the public. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 21:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

It is false I refused to discuss the deletion of my 200 articles, 18 AfD discussions are overhere, also, they are proof how they acted with 1-0 vote no evidences to delete. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 20:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Hugo, you've been told often enough now that casting aspersions on other editors, like you've done in your comments above, is unacceptable. If you continue on this page with the behaviour that lead to your block your access to it will be revoked as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Three users are playing with an entire system, I thought it was my fault, but then I realized the Gang of Three targeted more articles day after day. I must recognize the banner, giantsnowman and mississippi star could cheat and laugh at the wikipedia entire page. But they did not cheat on me, I've realized its game, I discovered and I showed to the public. The outcome was expected, users dodge the real question about being cheated with AfD with 1-0 votes, fake discussions and of course the joke of deletion review, the gang of three was discovered by me, they are cheating every time. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 21:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm concerned User:Bbb23 and User:Sir Sputnik that a first block in months (and the second ever) being indefinite is overkill, especially for a productive editor. A block was absolutely necessary to end the drama. But I fear an indefinite block will only alienate a valuable editor, who needs rehabilitating - not driving away.

Hugo is wrong to assume that there's a conspiracy theory here. The much simpler answer is (as is often the case), mistakes, misunderstandings, and apathy. Had they remained polite and civil, then this could have been a lot cleaner.

Hugo is entirely right that the AFD system completely failed - as it's hard to find an article that was put up for deletion here, that didn't meet WP:NSEASONS. There was very little participation at AFD; AFD participation has been very poor lately - especially in the Football area. An indefinite block - perceived unfair - will leader an upset editor to further, dumb, actions. I see that there's now a sockpuppet report here, but I won't comment on that. Hopefully we can find a way to rehabilitate this user (and perhaps the increasingly failing AFD system). Nfitz (talk) 23:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Not a CU so I can't confirm one way or the other but I'll say that a) jumping right into this hornet's nest and b) invoking Sakiv (which Hugo also did leaves me little doubt that Hugo is behind the new account. If not for mention of Sakiv I'd have been leaning joe-job, but this seems a little too close to the heart of Hugo's issues with The Banner's nominations. Note: no comment on Sakiv's creations. I've had enough soccer for a very long time. Apologies for not linking the CU. I'm not sure best practices there these days. Star Mississippi 00:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• I'll repeat the comment I made today from my talk page here. HugoAcosta9 needs to stop their sock-puppetry - and using IP addresses like 2806:2F0:31C0:AC8:84C5:A9C6:C132:B7DA and 187.156.98.86. Do you not realise that the quite reasonable arguments you make, are not only impacted by your inappropriate editing, but that the sockpuppetry actually hurts your arguments. Please stop, take 6 months, come back and apologise profusely - and most importantly never, ever, be a sockpuppet or IP edit again. I'm not sure you realise how badly this is seen by the community. Nfitz (talk) 20:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #74260

is open. I am restoring talk page access so user can request unblocking here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

@HugoAcosta9 you need to use the following for your request to show: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} and editors to respond to your request. Star Mississippi 21:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HugoAcosta9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am writing to request an appeal of my block that was imposed in October of 2022. I was wrong and had been uploading disruptive edits, including personal attacks, disruption at AfDs - doubles down at thread brought by user to ANI. This behavior ultimately led to my block from Wikipedia. I acknowledge that I was frequently advised to stop, but I chose to ignore the warnings and continued my actions, which resulted in my block. At that time, I frequently added disruptive edits to discussions, including sockpuppettering six months ago despite editors' instructions that I do not do so. I disregarded their warnings and persisted in my irresponsible behavior. After I was blocked, instead of taking time off to do other things, I was deceitful and frequently engaged in Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry, originally using the IPs. I also utilized a wide range of various IP addresses. In December 2022, I was not aware that I had engaged in sockpuppetry and believed that I was able to request a standard offer (SO) in good faith. I now understand that my actions were inappropriate and have since learned more about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. While I recognize that this does not excuse my behavior, it does help explain why I have kept coming back to the site. I want to emphasize that I did not have any malicious intent and did not intend to violate any of Wikipedia's rules. I am a passionate supporter of Wikipedia and deeply regret any harm that my actions may have caused to the community. Since my account was banned, I have taken steps to educate myself about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I have stayed away from the site for over six months. I am eager to return to the community and make meaningful contributions. And for over six months, I have been editing at Spanish Wikipedia, making positive contributions like creating new articles. I feel that it could benefit my contributions to Wikipedia, especially with football articles. I realize that my past behavior was unacceptable and violated Wikipedia's policies. However, I am deeply remorseful for my actions and am committed to making positive contributions to the community. I want to prove that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia in a responsible and productive manner. HugoAcosta9 (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only, as I have copied this appeal to the administrators' noticeboard for community discussion. If you wish to add any comments to or respond to questions on the appeal thread, you may place those responses here and request that someone copy them over for you.Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Undeniably involved comment, I do somewhat agree with @Nfitz: above that "the AFD system completely failed", which was a big part of what led to Hugo's frustration. I was the closer of some of the original AfDs and ultimately ended up agreeing with them being relisted/restored once the full picture became more clear. Courtesy links: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 October 19, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1112#Concerns_about_articles_nominated_for_deletion. I'm not going to take action and have not reviewed the Spanish edits they refer to above, but I do thank them for their clear & direct request above. Star Mississippi 22:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

• Hi HugoAcosta9. Per community consensus at WP:AN this account has been unblocked. Closing statement for the AN thread is here. Happy editing. -- Euryalus (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1993 U.S. Cup

added links pointing to John Doyle, Branco, Luisinho, Elivelton, Nonato and Almir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1978–79 Nottingham Forest F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Needham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HugoAcosta9. Thank you for your work on 1982–83 Nottingham Forest F.C. season. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating and expanding the article on Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve 1965–66 Hartlepools United F.C. season

Hello, HugoAcosta9,

Thank you for creating 1965–66 Hartlepools United F.C. season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The sourcing on this article does not clearly show that this particular season was notable. I understand fans love charts like these but Wikipedia is not the home for cruft fans find useful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Here we go... again.

I'm not a Hartlepool fan. The season is as notable as the other Division Four teams: 1965–66 Bradford City A.F.C. season, 1965–66 Chester F.C. season, 1965–66 Colchester United F.C. season, 1965–66 Newport County A.F.C. season, 1965–66 Port Vale F.C. season, 1965–66 Rochdale A.F.C. season and well-sourced better than them by a lot. The season is notable by the fact of the debut of Brian Clough as manager, is not only my article there is a BOOK published by John McGovern about that.Nfitz HugoAcosta9 (talk) 02:14, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:1994–95 Correcaminos UAT season

Hello, HugoAcosta9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1994–95 Correcaminos UAT season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1994–95 Correcaminos UAT season (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1994–95 Correcaminos UAT season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, HugoAcosta9! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1983–84 Juventus FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toronto Blizzard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 1989–90 UC Sampdoria season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giovanni Invernizzi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited 1988–89 AC Fiorentina season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olympiakos.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1998–99 Real Madrid CF season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Velez Sarsfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1992–93 AS Roma season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stefano Pellegrini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1991–92 Inter Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucchese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi HugoAcosta9. Thank you for your work on 1960–61 Inter Milan season. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)