User talk:Hlevy2

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Hlevy2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transponder timing may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

read performance. Transponders have also been placed on the race bib, particularly with the [[Innovative Timing Systems Jaguar and DAG Systems (passive system) as well as J-Chip (active system).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Basil King (painter and poet) (July 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Agtx was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basil King (painter and poet) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

agtx 19:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

Please link this account to your main account. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hlevy2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hlevy2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Kappa Alpha Psi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 02:59, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other account?[edit]

Hlevy2 I was just wondering what is your main account, since I cannot find a link? Thanks, Qwerty number1 (talk) 20:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC).[reply]

In 2014 you wrote on your userpage: "I use this account when I travel." You did not declare your main account. Since that time, you have been asked at least twice to declare your main account, which you are required to do. Each time you ignored the request. In the years you've had this account, you have made 200+ edits. Many of them have been to project space. I expect a response to my comments here.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: looks like they never responded? At least not here. And they just used this account to !vote in EvergreenFir's RfA. @Hlevy2:, what's the other account or accounts? Please respond promptly or I'm going to have to take some kind of action here. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 22:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockdrawer?

I'm now seeing a handful of SPAs all editing this same Basil King (painter and poet) article, along with this account. All of these took turns submitting the draft version until it finally went through, then all of them edited it. Um... Hlevy2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), anything you want to tell us? - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 22:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mark lamoureux (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
Devosdevine (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
CYBCYB2016 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

The edits from the above SPAs are too stale for checkuser, but I think it shows a willingness to sock. Looking at editing patterns, I'm seeing definite overlaps with indeffed user Racepacket (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log):

@Kudpung: also pinging you as you asked this user to disclose their other account back in 2016. If there's no response I guess we can add this to the SPI, but I'm tempted to just go on the quacking. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 00:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - The Basil King page was created (and legitimately denied) in support of a proposed art exhibition for a small museum. I didn’t reply to your queries about my account because I simply didn’t see them. Am not sure I have another account? Any account I have is being used by someone without permission. Hope that helps! Let me know if you need additional info. (But not about Basil King because goodness knows I haven’t thought about him or that museum in years.) - devosdevine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devosdevine (talk • contribs) 00:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that this is your talk page? - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 01:02, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CorbieVreccan, Sounds to me like the 'little brother' syndrome. They quack so loud, duck them all and get a CU to check for snoring. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CU confirmed. On it. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: CU confirmed Hlevy2 and Racepacket in same location. Other evidence (heavy overlaps in editing, continued refusal to answer about main account / other accounts) is behavioural. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 20:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page notices[edit]

Please be careful with how you word talk page notices. Wording like this is a biased presentation of the situation. Please see WP:Canvassing, specifically its commentary on Campaigning. It would be nice if you'd refactor your posting to a more neutral reflection of the proposed merger. Imzadi 1979 → 00:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Partnerships/Recommendations/Q1 R5[edit]

Thanks for responding on meta. I've replied as best I can at Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups/Partnerships/Recommendations/Q1_R5#Priority_for_Knowledge_Equity. Thanks. Battleofalma (talk) 11:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:33, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]