User talk:HJackson77

Hi HJackson77! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

21:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sam Granville[edit]

The article Sam Granville has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Kirbanzo ^{(talk - contribs)} 01:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, everything is now sourced. HJackson77 (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are trying to delete this ? HJackson77 (talk) 13:42, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sam Granville[edit]

Hello, HJackson77,

Thank you for creating Sam Granville.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nearly all references are PRIMARY. What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sam Granville for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Granville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Granville until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

OGLV (talk) 08:40, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sam Granville. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:12, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Wilson Carvalho article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:05, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cheshunt F.C. seasons[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cheshunt F.C. seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Henri, I hope you're well.

I've added 2022–23 Cheshunt F.C. season to it's category page. I'm willing to help to update the Cheshunt pages/seasons etc. in the future. I grew up in Waltham Cross and used to watch Cheshunt some years back! GlenTheYid (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:HJackson77[edit]

User:HJackson77, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HJackson77 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:HJackson77 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:35, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022–23 Cheshunt F.C. season for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022–23 Cheshunt F.C. season, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022–23 Cheshunt F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Morrall (footballer, born 2003)[edit]

The article George Morrall (footballer, born 2003) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncontroversial deletion. Has almost no coverage in reliable sources independent of Morrall (e.g. news sources and not just club websites)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

F.C. Romania[edit]

Hello. As you're a coach at this club, you really shouldn't be editing the article as you have a WP:Conflict of interest. By all means suggest improvements on the talk page though. Cheers, Number 5 7 18:44, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just another request not to edit this article due to your conflict of interest. Number 5 7 19:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mahamadou Diarra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report[edit]

Hello. As you appear to be trying to game the system by recreating the article on yourself using a new account, and have ignored the conflict of interest-related requests re FC Romania, I have filed a report on your recent actions at ANI. Cheers, Number 5 7 11:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your alternate account. Continued disruption will lead to a block on this account as well. Consider this your final warning @HJackson77. Star Mississippi 15:19, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:HJackson77/sandbox[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:HJackson77/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Courcelles (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 18:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #75301[edit]

is closed -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon,

Can my block be reviewed please, I am ready to return.

Thanks. HJackson77 (talk) 15:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you follow the instruction in the block notice and that I repeated at UTRS to place an unblock request at the bottom of your talk page? Please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page, filling in your reason:

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thanks! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well look at that. You were blocked for sock puppetry in September and will not be eligible for unblock consideration till March. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: This user is now editing while logged out as 81.131.16.84 (talk · contribs), including at articles they have a conflict of interest with. Number 5 7 16:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HJackson77. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 10:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]