User talk:Glenn4pr

Welcome!

Hello, Glenn4pr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  AdamBiswanger1 05:36, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Community of Christ edits

While making extensive extensive edits to the Community of Christ article, its focus is beginning to wander. Here are some things to consider in your efforts to improve the article: Wikipedia recommends a brief introduction, with details covered in the body of the article. You expanded the intro until it is larger than the overview section. Wikipedia articles should in general keep their size to 32 kB or less, with additional material going into subsidiary articles. The C of C article is now up to 38 kB. Please read up on the articles suggested in your welcome above, and also the Guide to writing better articles and the Manual of Style to familiarize yourself with WP community conventions. Also, external links should generally be kept out of the body of the article. I will demonstrate the recommended method of supplying such references inline, for display in a notes section. Best wishes with your continued contributions. --Blainster 21:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Article discussions normally take place on the article's talk page. I brought the subject up here so that you won't miss my message. If you place the article on your watchlist (click the tab at the top of the article), then you can keep track of any changes, and be sure to follow any discussion on the talk page. Religious talk pages sometimes get sidetracked into debates over doctrines and beliefs, but the discussions on Wikipedia should be limited to how to write a better article. --Blainster 22:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SeaborgFamilyPortrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SeaborgFamilyPortrait.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Redirect tag at Community of Christ

Please do not remove the redirect tag at Community of Christ - it is a necessary and proper disambiguation tool for Wikipedia readers. Thank you for your understanding. FCYTravis 02:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The RLDS redirect to CofC is important as a navigation issue. As you know it does not reflect the naming preference of CofC, and should not be seen as such. The use of the redirect reflects the most common use of the term. Recently some Restoration Branch members have sought to use RLDS in reference to themselves, and the CofC legal department has been in communication with WP regarding that issue. The creation of the dab page was part of the resolution, so please do not change it. If you have questions about this please contact Bob Lewis at the CofC legal department. --Blainster 19:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

History of science collaboration

The current History of Science Collaboration of the Month is Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science/Collaboration of the Month/current.

Thanks for voting. I hope you find time to participate this month.--ragesoss 02:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Dallin H. Oaks Christ Chapel Idaho Falls Idaho Temple Dubna Patriarch (Mormonism) Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Orteig Prize Law of Consecration William Smith (Mormonism) Stephen Timoshenko L. Tom Perry Alpheus Cutler Branch President Community-based development Alexander Hale Smith Branch (Mormonism) High priest (Mormonism) John Whittaker Taylor

Cleanup Anti-Mormonism Elohim Lucy Mack Smith Merge CFC-Youth For Christ Free neutron Half-life Add Sources Sidney Rigdon Transuranium element CTR ring Wikify Chinchilla NMEA Dr. Rod J.K. Wilson Expand Hassium Pre-existence Cart

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Cheville Chapel

Point taken, but I was also confused by the statement, "does not typically have a regular schedule of services." There are two regular services held in the Chapel on Sunday, and two more during the week (Tuesdays and Wednesdays). --Dbolton 06:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Ela Gandhi/Ghandi

Thanks for making the article Ela Ghandi. However, there is also one about her at Ela Gandhi, the real spelling of her last name. Could you move some of the information from your article into that article. I will then delete one and merge the histories into the other one. Also, the two articles have different birth years. Are you sure that yours is the right one?

Thanks. Academic Challenger 03:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

See the discussion on the Ela Gandhi page. We seem to have corroborated 1940 as her year of birth. Also, both spellings are used, but I think we may be best to conform to the popular spelling of her grandfather's name. Thanks Glenn4pr 04:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Vasa Order of America

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Vasa Order of America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Young Peacemakers Club

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Young Peacemakers Club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Wholly unsourced. No assertion of notability. No substantive edits in over 2 years.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 04:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Boberg c.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Boberg c.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Disciples' Generous Response

I have nominated Disciples' Generous Response, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disciples' Generous Response. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. noq (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UniPaaS

The article UniPaaS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Advertisement for a non-notable software product. References are all to press releases. Google News Archive finds only more of the same.[1]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:40, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IBOLT

The article IBOLT has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Advertisement for a non-notable enterprise application integration (EAI) and business process management (BPM) software product. "References" supplied are usual suspects like Gartner "magic quadrants", internal sites, announcements, versions, and routine transactions; or are not about this product specifically.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of IBOLT for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article IBOLT, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBOLT until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of UniPaaS for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article UniPaaS, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UniPaaS until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Magic Software Enterprises for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magic Software Enterprises is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Software Enterprises until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Maproom (talk) 09:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Glenn4pr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)