Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBOLT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IBOLT[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement for a non-notable enterprise application integration (EAI) and business process management (BPM) software product. The references supplied are either to usual suspects like Gartner "magic quadrants", analyst reports that do not confer notability; to internal sites, announcements, versions, and announcements of routine transactions, none of which are truly independent of the subject; or are not about this product specifically. I found a lot of press releases, but nothing that read like it was neutral and independent, in news searches. Contested proposed deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Delete per nom, no evidence of notability. Yworo (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seddon ^talk|^WikimediaUK 17:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Promotional article, non-notable per nom. SnottyWong ^chatter 17:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.