User talk:Frogger3140

User talk:Loves2Spoog[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User talk:Loves2Spoog, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User talk:Loves2Spoog is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User talk:Loves2Spoog, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion was contested --Macbookair3140 (talk) 18:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Polling templates[edit]

I have nominated Category:Polling templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ ^echo 03:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a sock.[edit]

I am not a sockpuppet of Rex071404 unless he knows my password. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 17:57, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Arrow left.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Arrow left.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture 78.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Picture 78.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following images:

File:Css-silk.png
File:Css-valid.png
File:Css add.png
File:Css delete.png
File:Css go.png
File:Green warning.png

—Bkell (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Option-Shift-K listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Option-Shift-K. Since you had some involvement with the Option-Shift-K redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 04:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Frogger3140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Tiptoety @Hersfold I was 10 years old at the time of the block. I did the edits and pagemoves out of immaturity. I am now a well-rounded 16-year-old, almost turning 17 years old. I know my actions were sort of clever for a 10-year-old but I can give proof that I am indeed 16 years old right now. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 04:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

There is consensus to unblock you on the Administrators' Noticeboard thread, so I am doing so. I would advise you to stick to one account (whether that be this unblocked Frogger3140 or the now blocked Macbookair3140) and warn you that any further sockpuppetry may involve a reblock. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per the standard offer procedure, I am opening a thread here for the community to discuss whether you should be unblocked. It would help your cause greatly to briefly talk about what sort of article work you plan to do on Wikipedia if unblocked. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would certainly concede that if indeed you were ten years old at the time of your block, which was some seven years ago, it could well be reasonable to expect you to have matured in the interim. An answer to the question posted above would probably be helpful.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Way back then I think I made some anti-vandal contribs and I'd like to keep up with the vandal watch when I feel like it. I'm learning OpenCL and Intel Intrinsics too, so I might make my own automated anti-vandal bot using an artificial neural network. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please comment on your relation to the account User:Rex071404? Seeing as it is a banned account, it may require more discussion than is happening on this talk page. Tiptoety ^talk 09:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a relation to User:Rex071404. I don't even understand how the false connection to that user was made. I can give proof if necessary. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 11:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the sockpuppetry policy. I have reached trusted positions on User:Macbookair3140 so I feel like I must admit this connection. Feel free to checkuser to confirm this. However, realize that I have made a few legitimate edits so put that into consideration. I am very sorry for doing this. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for disclosing that account. As you probably understand, I have since blocked that account. With regards to this current account do you plan on engaging in any content editing or do you think your edits will solely be in the area of ant-vandalism? Tiptoety ^talk 20:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will contribute to the encyclopedia with the knowledge I currently have, though I don't really know much compared to other Wikipedia editors. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 00:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus on AN is tending towards unblocking you, but I think your answers to what you would like to do when unblocked have been a little vague. I'd like to see specific articles you are interested in working on. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know enough information to contribute to an article right now. I'd rather work on the AVX2/OpenCL-powered anti-vandal bot, and contribute to the anti-vandal watch at times. Also, I'd rather edit on the Macbookair3140 account than this one. --░▒▓Frogger3140▓▒░ (talk) 14:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked. In line with your preference, I have blocked this account and unblocked User:Macbookair3140. Happy editing. Bishonen | talk 23:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]