User talk:El Wikipedian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi El Wikipedian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 10:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! El Wikipedian (talk) 10:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

El Wikipedian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

no idea who this user is but it isn’t me maybe just someone in my apartment?

Decline reason:

Then I suggest that you ask around your apartment and possibly your building to see if anyone has been blocked from editing Wikipedia and ask them to get themselves unblocked because it is affecting you. 331dot (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Oh, yes. Same ISP and same city… but same grudge against a low profile editor? And different people? No one here is that naive. Courcelles (talk) 00:04, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

El Wikipedian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So, as stated this user is not me, it some teenage kid 2 floors below me in my apartment, who went and cursed wikipedia the moment I started talking to him. So, unlikely to get himself unblock. Can you please unblock me because this isn't me and I have no idea what this person is doing but I'm annoyed that im blocked because of them

Decline reason:

This is a variation of "my little brother did it", which is generally dismissed out of hand. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:56, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

El Wikipedian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi, could somebody please unblock me. I really want to edit Wikipedia. It's fun and I have done nothing wrong. To address the complaints. First, I am not that other user you say I'm a sockpuppet of. I have even figured out who it is, and it's sure not me! Second, the idea that I hold some grudge against an (never named by the way) user, who I don't think I've even interacted with, is...I don't know what to say. My replies have been twofold. First, get the other person to get themselves unblocked. I tried, and this seems unlikely to happen. Second, that I am just making up lies and blaming someone else. Neither is useful nor true. One other thing. I don't think it was fair to checkuser me. I recall that there are very strict standards for doing so. There must be behavior patterns to indicate it. Theyre are none, I have hardly been around long enough to say behavorial patterns. But, In, the end, here is what I'm asking for. How can I get myself unblocked? At this point, I seriously don't care about someone else and what they did.

Decline reason:

First the miscreant was "some kid in your apartment building", then now you don't seem to know who it is? Can you blame us if we have trust issues with you? (Oh, and by the way Courcelles was completely within his rights to run a CU on you).

I also saw that ANEW thread that led to this. Your persona there seems rather at odds with how you are presenting yourself here. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

El Wikipedian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

read my other unblock requests, the same holds true now. My last response made absouletly no sense. Here is my simple question. How can I get myself unblocked and somehow get you all to see that im not a sockpuppet? Thank you and have a nice day. I am willing to say stay away from Skyerise (who I think is the user you say I have a grudge against) and will, if you want, not do anything that would be illegitamate if me and that other person were sockpuppets. Okay?

Decline reason:

As others have already said, your denials are simply not plausible. As this is clearly not going anywhere, I'm revoking your access to this page. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is open. Not verified to this account. WP:check user block -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:36, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is closed.

March 2024 GAN backlog drive[edit]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]