User talk:Easing3220

September 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Shosh, Nagorno-Karabakh—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for messaging, why du you think it is not constructive? Easing3220 (talk) 08:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Khojaly (town). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Only extended confirmed users are authorized to edit topics related to politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both — broadly construed, per WP:GS/AA. AntonSamuel (talk) 09:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AntonSamuel as I observed your wicked ethno-nationalist peace loving pretending mindset and so called unbiased view does not reflect reality. Please don't @ me again. I will not back down on making Azerbaijani wiki pages unbiased. Easing3220 (talk) 09:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: Hello, this non-ec user is continuing to edit political topics on Armenia/Azerbaijan-related articles despite my post above. AntonSamuel (talk) 12:22, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are your from Azerbaijan and you think you know enough Azerbaijani history to school me on which Azerbaijani wiki page I can edit? It is about Azerbaijan not Armenia. I have not touched any Armenian Wikipedia page and don't plan to touch it due to my limited knowledge about it. But you self righteously pretend to know it all about Azerbaijan? Even though you are not Azerbaijani citizen. Please spread your propoganda elswhere not under my talk page. Easing3220 (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kalbajar. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then block me for typing the truth I don't care. Easing3220 (talk) 12:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AntonSamuel (talk) 15:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kalbajar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. (t · c) buidhe 16:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Azərbaycanlısınız deyəsən. Ona görə də azərbaycanca yazıram. Arxa arxaya heç bir səbəb olmadan geri qaytarmaq (başqasının yazdığını silmək) redaktə müharibəsi sayılır. Haqlısınızsa müzakirə edib haqlı olduğunuzu sübut etməlisiniz. Haqlı olmanız geri qaytarmağınıza əsas vermir. Ümumiyyətlə Qarabağla bağlı məqalələrə Arbitraj Komitəsi (ingiliscə vikipediyanın məhkəməsi) tərəfindən məhdudiyyətlər tətbiq olunub. Bu məqalələrdə redaktə etmək üçün 500+ redaktəniz olmalıdır. Ətraflı burdan oxuya bilərsiniz: WP:GS/AA. Bu cür redaktələrə davam etsəniz adminlərdən biri sizi bloklayacaq. Zəhmət olmasa dayandırın. Nemoralis (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yox başa düşdüm amma bu Erməni editorlar da revert edir təkcə mən yox. Onlara niyə bir şey deyən yoxdu? İndi başa düşdüm niyə İngilis Dilli qarabağ wikisis bu gündədi, 100 dənə Erməni editoru pusquda durur ki birdən nəsə düz şey yazallar qoy report edək guya ki qaydaları pozublar. Sabah araşdıracam görüm protected page edə bilərəm Kəlbəcər səhifəsini ya yox. Easing3220 (talk) 17:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Burda azərbaycanlıları sıxışdırıb, erməniləri dəstəkləyən adminlər yoxdur. Hər eşitdiyinizə inanmayın. Mənbəniz varsa haqlı sizsiniz, yoxdursa əksinə. Qaydaları pozmusunuz, guyalıq birşey yoxdur. Yuxarıda qeyd etmişəm. Qarabağ haqqında olan məqalələrdə (Azərbaycan-Ermənistan siyasəti, münaqişələrinə aid hər şey) məhdudiyyət var. Redaktə edə bilməzsiniz. Nemoralis (talk) 17:10, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mən adminlərə söz demirəm, reportu edən Erməni wiki editorlardı. Girin bir Qarabağda olan şəhərlərin wiki səhifəsinə baxın elə bil Erməni təhsil nazirliyi yazıb hamısını. Erməni editorları müşahidə elədiyimə görə Azərbaycanlı editorlardan çoxdur buna görə də disbalans yaranıb. Qaydaları pozduğumu bildimdə deyirəm olarda pozub təkcə mən yox. Bu mənə qaydaları pozmağıma haqq qazandırmır amma yenə deyirəm onlarda qaydaları pozub. Easing3220 (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for recommendations, I am new to Wikipedia and it just infuriated me how Wikipedia is full of Armenian vandalism on historical facts. Easing3220 (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Black Kite (talk) 21:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfairly suspension on a offence that I did not commit and kindly asking Wikipedia administrators to rethink granting administrator named Black Kite to have administrator rights[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easing3220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal to Wikipedia administrators to have my account indefinite block to be reviewed and taken action against administrators that behave immaturely and from pure instinct instead of reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#c-Black_Kite-20230926210200-User%3AEasing3220 As seen in this Administrator's Incident report, board Administrator named Black Kite somehow decided that I am doing is having Sock puppet account which means I am using alternative accounts to edit Wikipedia pages, which I have never done and don't plan on doing. I am an honest and dedicated person, and I don't want to break the rules unless I have no choice. Which in this case I had to. The reason for me getting blocked at first was because me having edit war with user called AntonSamuel which is extremely hostile to new users that doesn't see the world on their perspective, and they reported me for having edit war while they being engaged with me at that edit war which I did not know was illegal while that user with long history of editing most certainly did, yet he has chosen to continue that edit war with me until he got tired of and reported me and changing narrative towards me with expectation of me getting blocked. While another user called Archives908 stated that I am some person that could not be trusted to behave decent, so I should be banned which, I would like to know has teamed up with user AntonSamuel to change countless Wikipedia pages to suit their nationalist agenda that Armenians never done war crimes during Karabakh war, or it is something that can be glossed over. I tried to change Kalbajar wiki page to emphasize that town's most known thing is its ethnic people were driven out by invading force and ethnically cleansed from its population that lived there for hundreds of years this Armenian users tries to deny that simple fact which enraged me as my grandparents were forced out from their lands by Armenians that had the similar mindset. Thanks for considering my appeal.

Decline reason:

Try again without the personal attacks. You've already been warned about this; WP:NPA is not optional. For that matter, specifically stating that you plan on breaking the rules ("I don't want to break the rules unless I have no choice", emphasis mine) all but guarantees you'll remain blocked. Yamla (talk) 16:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also I have to point out that there is absolute no proof that I have multiple accounts[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easing3220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know Wikipedia rules of appealing ban states that you have to be showing remorse of breaking Wikipedia rules which I do about edit war and I think that it makes it hard for Wikipedia readers to get accurate information but having multiple accounts, I haven't done it and I will not apologize for a thing that I have not done. And my suspension for the edit warring has already over, so I didn't need to apologize for that while understanding it was a wrong move.

Decline reason:

Duplicate request - see below. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will follow the rules and don't break them, I state this as a promise[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easing3220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I have broken the rules and I promise that I will not break them again no matter how false the information is, and will fight disinformation while following the rules.

Decline reason:

Evading your block to post on the blocking administrator's talk page complaining about your block was not a good move. I don't know the circumstances surrounding the original block, but this is WP:EVADE, and it means I am unable to accept your request. While the block remains in place, the only edits you may make anywhere on this project are to this talk page, concerning your own block. You may wish to consider the standard offer at this point. Girth Summit _(blether) 19:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

END STATEMENT[edit]

I will not exit this page without fighting for my honor. My IP address was only blocked for 48 hours and after that I could edit wikipedia pages but my account was indefinitely blocked which means it was my right to write about how I felt about admin’s decision at his talk page. If no reasonable administrator came to my aid and put stop to this nonsense I will star to think that this place is filled with unjust power tripping people. I don’t want to leave this place with that feeling so I wish there was a person that would see the reason but I sense that tribalism some admins have here will make my voice unheard yet I wish to be mistaken.

Building on the people is like building on the sand.

I wished this quote not to be true but how administrators within this important knowledge community behaves makes me think that quote might be true.

End of statement. Easing3220 (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have no 'rights' here. Wikipedia is a privately owned website, hosted on privately owned servers. Editing here is a privilege, not a right. Administrators have a mandate, given to then by the community they serve, to withdraw that privilege when they see fit. Blocked users may request an unblock, which will be reviewed by an uninvolved administrator, but they may not evade the block under any circumstances, including by editing through an IP while logged out. Your appeals to alternate authorities such as stewards will fall on deaf ears: they have no power to over-rule decisions made by administrators on this project. As Yamla has suggested, you may wish to consider the wording if your unblock request below. Best Girth Summit _(blether) 21:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal so I can appeal tribalism amongst Wikipedia Administrators that mistreated me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Easing3220 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been subjected to block by tribalist administrators and I ask this to be researched in democratic manner. Without administrators that stick to each other and cover their backs like removing my opinion on talk pages. Come to each others aid and see editors as someone that is second class. What makes wikipedia is not only administrators but editors too. At this point I do not ask for myself to be unblocked so I can keep editing while following rules. I will only use my regained editing powers to Appeal to other Administrators about this power abuse. And I promise that it will be the only use I will have for this account until I will get resolution to this issue.

I will not exit this page without fighting for my honor. My IP address was only blocked for 48 hours and after that I could edit wikipedia pages but my account was indefinitely blocked which means it was my right to write about how I felt about admin’s decision at his talk page. If no reasonable administrator came to my aid and put stop to this nonsense I will star to think that this place is filled with unjust power tripping people. I don’t want to leave this place with that feeling so I wish there was a person that would see the reason but I sense that tribalism some admins have here will make my voice unheard yet I wish to be mistaken.

Building on the people is like building on the sand.

I wished this quote not to be true but how administrators within this important knowledge community behaves makes me think that quote might be true.

End of statement.

Decline reason:

Talk page access removed. 331dot (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you absolutely sure you wish this unblock request to be reviewed? It will all but certainly result in your talk page access being revoked. Note that blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until this block is successfully contested, you personally are not permitted to edit. That includes using another account or editing anonymously. --Yamla (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please do it. I have nothing to fear. I did not break that rule at that time when I got blocked knowingly or unknowingly while I broke the rule after I got blocked by BlackKite, unknowingly. Now I am also messaging wikipedia stewards knowingly that I am breaking the rule (which technically I did not break because I was unjustly blocked) and asking this issue to be reviewed and I know that I break the rules while doing it but if these unjust administrators face consequences I will be glad because other new editors might finally feel welcomed at this place if not me. Easing3220 (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]