User talk:Dretynit

February 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dretynit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Abuse? Highlighting major policy violations by your editors is abuse? The fact you do nothing about this is the abuse. You are committing the abuse. *Talk page access revoked* You fucking intellectual fraud. Dretynit (talk) 06:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:NPA isn't the way to get unblocked. The way to get unblocked is to address the reason for the block. Yamla (talk) 07:51, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dretynit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

So tell me why I'm blocked Dretynit (talk) 09:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Since you seem intent on making personal attacks I have decided to remove talk page access. You may make further appeals via WP:UTRS but can lose access there too if your behavior does not change. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Technical evidence shows you are the long-term vandal blocked for racist trolling, Caucasoid Dave etc. You aren't very good at covering your tracks, to be honest. --Yamla (talk) 09:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

For "racist trolling" read trying to correct the bias and policy violations of the woke morons that infest this place. Maybe if you spent more time addressing policy violations than trying to ban people this place would be less of an intellectual laughing stock. Dretynit (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)