User talk:DoriSmith/Archive 19
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DoriSmith/Archive_19. |
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |  |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 |
Hi there!
Just to let you know, I wasn't the one who created the submission Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Injil and Caesar. I moved it from WP:AFC/R (see original diff) because I thought it was an above-average article about a subject that didn't already exist. :P Looking at Gospel in Islam, the submission is almost a word-for-word copy.
Thanks for finding this out! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:20, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry about hitting you with the template; the AFC helper script adds those automatically to whoever created the page. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 07:30, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's not a problem. ;) Cheers! Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:15, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2012 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Singles final
Hi Dori,
I think it is unfair that you are rejecting my article for the 2012 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Singles final, when there is one for the 2008 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Singles final, the 2013 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Singles final, the 2012 US Open – Men's Singles final, the 2012 French Open – Men's Singles final, and the 2012 Australian Open – Men's Singles final.
Why do those five other finals get their own pages but the 2012 Wimbledon final, which is more historic than any of them except the 2008 Wimbledon final, is getting summarily rejected. It is totally different from the page for the tournament draw that you cited.
Your criteria for rejecting my article would have to apply for those other five pages but you are only applying it to my article.
Can you please consider retracting your rejection in light of this double standard.
ryan889. Dory what is your deal! why should you addd liks to wikipedia but i shouldn't?
What if others rejected your editions. look at this website again to see if there are even any ads there: http://filekangaroo.com/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan889 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your consideration,
Praline97 8:49, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Weston Sailing Club - decline
Hi
Just trying work out what I need to do to get the Weston Sailing Club article accepted?
The History of WSC is on the www.weston.org.uk because I put it there. The history was produced for the club, by a club member. There is no copy right infringement. The original of the history is lodged at the Southampton city council's public records, so it in open domain anyway. I spent the time creating a Wiki Article (for the first time) as I felt the history was of encyclopaedic interest.
what can I do?
rgs Matthew — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.252.11 (talk) 08:41, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- This is in regards to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Weston Sailing Club by Mzjfb7 (talk · contribs).
- I'm not an expert on UK copyright, and there's no way for someone to tell looking at that PDF to tell that the content been freed into the public domain.
My suggestion is to try a clean slate — pretend you know nothing at all about the club, and look for verifiable and reliable independent third party sources with significant coverage. Then, write the article based solely upon what those sources say, not the club's info. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 07:30, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert on UK copyright, and there's no way for someone to tell looking at that PDF to tell that the content been freed into the public domain.
- This is a bit Chicken and Egg... and a having self confessed non-expert of UK copyright law decline an article on copyright grounds is perplexing. There is no other data about Weston Sailing club in the public domain, other than what I stated in my original query. The document was typed on a typewriter, I OCR'd the document and created the PDF. The Author is deceased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mzjfb7 (talk • contribs) 08:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Dear Editor,
I've submitted this page to be reviewed by Wikipedia yesterday but it appears to be declined because it was a blank submission. This is rather peculiar considering I did in fact edit the page and saved it. When I view my project page, the copy is there along with all the other references for each point made.
I don't quite understand what I should do right now as the advice given was to "any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer."
The submission has been edited via the "edit source" tab. There isn't anything above the entry itself.
Please let me know how the project can be resent to you for viewing without having this problem. I'm not sure if this will help but here's the link I copied from the url bar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Dealmates
Your patience is this matter is very much appreciated. Thank you very much.
Nasi sambal (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you checking my article. I appreciate that it is not ready for publication, and I definitely want to uphold Wikipedia's standards.
All of the information in this article comes from the core Xcrawl book, listed below with its ISBN number. Can you tell me how I need to reference this to make the article ready for publication?
For your convenience, here is the link to that page.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Xcrawl
Thanks again for your time! I love Wikipedia and am a huge supporter.
be well,
TravelingNow — Preceding unsigned comment added by TravlingNow (talk • contribs) 15:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
just a liitle ?? on my article
You mentioned that my submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Can you give me some suggestions, what do you think can be made better? What about the neutral point of view? Ideas? There are referenced sources, are there not enough?? I would like to re-write and have it accepted but would like to know how.. Thanks so much and have a great day!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_Adam_Kess — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.10.168.96 (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
My article was good not bad
Why did you decline my article. I love to post and imo that was a good post , just my 2 cent,s. any constructive criticism would be much appreciateD, please no unconstructive criticism thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alienboner69 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Trust Automation declined
Hi, Recently you declined my submission for Trust Automation, citing copy write issues. I am the marketing manager for Trust Automation and authored everything myself. There are no copy write issues. Could you please review again? Please let me know how we can get this approved and posted on Wikipedia. Rmitchellhee (talk) 22:37, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2600 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heimtextil - your declination
Hi, I would like to know why you declined my post about Heimtextil? I have added a lot of references and it seems enough from my point of you. Thanks a lot for your feedback. Steffffm2 (talk) 16:33, 1 October 2013 (UTC)Steffffm2
Request for comment
As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:36, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, DoriSmith:
WikiProject AFC is holding a two month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from December 1st, 2013 – January 31st, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2600 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
wiki message from you
Hi. I finally got a message that you'd left me a message-- or something. Not quite sure what's what, but do let me know. Ted Newsom (talk) 22:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Ted Newsom
Tom Luckey
Hi, yes, I was making links to new pages for Spencer Luckey and Luckey Climbers, but did not finish them in time. I'll make the pages first and then link to Tom Luckey, so we don't have dead links in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.98.65 (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello DoriSmith! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
- This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
Hello DoriSmith:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2600 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Informal note
Hey, I notice that you have HighBeam access and you seem to have a few topicons. That being said, if you are interested, I've created {{Wikipedia:HighBeam/Topicon}}. No reply to this message is necessary (and I won't see it unless you ping me), just wanted to let you know it was available. 
Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 00:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Credo
Hello! You have received preliminary approval for access to Credo. Please fill out this short form so that your access can be processed. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Deletion of the page Amit Phalke
Hi,
I think there was enough reference on the page about Amit Phalke. Infant there were articles having his statement too. Despite that, the page has been deleted.
I see a lot other pages without references & citation being active on Wikipedia. I think the page Amit Phalke should be retrieved & made live.
Thanks. Pooja — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poojasudrik (talk • contribs) 10:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Just curious: why do you get notified twice? Ottawahitech (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)please ping me
I think you went overboard on your cleanup here. I added back in some information, with citations, and an image. Bearian (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
New newsletter for Notifications
Hello
You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.
That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.
Please subscribe!
All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Manfred Rühl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manfred Rühl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Since you had some involvement with the Manfred Rühl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
JavaScript RegExp problem
I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.
Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.
Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Wildfire
Thank you for your Healdsburg contributions to Wikipedia; and I hope you are safely weathering this exceptional fire season. Thewellman (talk) 21:58, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
FMC issues
Hi DoriSmith, can you please check the actual content on the FMC page and comment on the talk page about the advertisement issue you added? Thank you very much, AakaFosfor (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Help me-na
Template:Help me-na has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nardog (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
"Lewis & Clark: Great Journey West" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Lewis & Clark: Great Journey West". Since you had some involvement with the "Lewis & Clark: Great Journey West" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)