User talk:DogeChungus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation[edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! DogeChungus, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Note that North East Delhi riots is one of the many articles covered by these sanctions. Doug Weller talk 10:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi DogeChungus! You created a thread called Customizing user page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


2020 delhi riots[edit]

Sorry, I meant to explain in my AGF revert, but accidentally hit return. Those edits you have made will need to be discussed on the talk page. The lead has been balanced with respect to a number of evolving sources and criteria. So large changes are problematic. Thanks. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 18:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kunnathur (State Assembly constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Democratic Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1999 Indian general election in Kerala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~ Amkgp 💬 17:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi DogeChungus! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Drafting an article while another one is pending review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:1998 Indian general election in Kerala has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1996 Indian general election in Kerala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 19:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
1998 Indian general election in Kerala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 19:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code[edit]

Information icon Hi DogeChungus! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Ram Vilas Paswan[edit]

On 9 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ram Vilas Paswan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bharatiya Janata Party, Kerala for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharatiya Janata Party, Kerala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bharatiya Janata Party, Kerala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have reverted your edits on the page. NDA has only 137 candidates in the election. Candidates from Devikulam and Guruvayur constituencies are not independent candidates, they are contesting as AIADMK and DSJP candidates respectively. They are not part of NDA alliance but have outside support from NDA (even though AIADMK is part of the alliance, the AIADMK candidate has not filed nomination in the name of NDA alliance). And regarding Thalassery constituency, there is uncertainty whether NDA is supporting COT Naseer, an independent candidate. The candidate himself has denied any support from NDA. So I have removed the name from the list. For the remaining two candidates, I have included the name but with a note that they are contesting with outside support from NDA and are not NDA candidates. Please discuss if you want any changes in the present version. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had already started a discussion in the article's talk page itself. Please do respond there. DogeChungus (talk) 14:35, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Performance of candidates from major alliances of the 2021 Kerala Legislative Assembly election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

4 july 2020 asianet survey[edit]

Don't add detailed survey. there is no need to add detailed survey. the final result is enough,it is already inciuded .there is more 20+ opinion poll if u add detailed survey of all it would consume lot of space. so final result is enough,which is already included in last row of opinion poll.moreover there is NO NEED to DETAILED REPORT of MOST OLDEST survey.simply its outdated. moreover NO WIKI PAGE BASED ON INDIAN ELECTION ADD DETAILED SURVEY IT MAKE PAGE UNNCESSARY LENGTHY .SO DON'T ADD IT AGAIN

Uh typing in all-caps will not make your opinion any extra legible. That said, I added it in in collapsed form so that a general reader doesn't have to see it all the time. Please bring it up in article talkpage to get a consensus. Thanks. DogeChungus (talk) 10:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion(using malayalam for convice,hope u r a malayali) janurayil anu adhyamayi ith njan remove akkunnath view historyil nokkam arum object chythilla pinee april 12 nu ann user satyam prakasham ith added chythath.so athrem nalum arum onnum add chythilla means consenus is clear.prakasham ith add chythappo aro ath appo thanne delete chythu again consensus is clear ,a date 12 aprill pinee ningal ath revert chythu. ningal revert chyathe just 1day or 2 day wait chyu appol manassilavum consensus. if am wrong njan pinee ethil adapedilla.mattu usersnte concern nokkallo.just 2 days ningal revert chyan nokkanda .mattum usersnte common mood appo manassilavum.

ath kuzhapamilla, Re-addition cheyumbozhum aarum objection parayarilla, appo pinne anghane thanne vecha pore? DogeChungus (talk) 18:12, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read my above comment again re add chythappol palarum remove chythittund prakashan add chythappo thanne a moment oral object chythu means delete chythu ath disagree.just look at view history orupad thavana ath remove akkitund . with in the few days 3 users delete me, iloveindia,and a unknown user it is clear majority don't want that. Just check view history ,if u don't believe me Vasucrossroads (talk) 06:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Those users actually had issues with constituency tables, not the Asianet one. DogeChungus (talk) 11:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]