User talk:Deville/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Christian Miles[edit]

There was no need to remove this article, it was about my friend who is an up-and-coming model (and by the way we cited sources). The fact that he is not THAT famous yet does not give you the right to remove his page. Because of you, I must now try to dig up the original page and restore it. You are of no help. ~Bovester


Afd - Hispanics and religion[edit]

Check out Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hispanics_and_religion--JuanMuslim 1m 01:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a tally of 91/1/4. I can't express how much it means to me to become an administrator. I'll work even more and harder to become useful for the community. If you need a helping hand, don't hesitate to contact me. NCurse work 15:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you thought my reason for deletion was "vague"? How could I get more specific than "Delete per WP:WEB"? There's no indication that this website or its content passes any of the criteria of WP:WEB. Thanks, Pan Dan 20:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that does help. You are right, I did mean the notability criteria at WP:WEB. Next time I cite WP:WEB I'll be more specific.
Thanks! In this case, however, I really do think that this subject meets the criteria for notability, although I'll grant you it's not a slam dunk.
I suppose since all the sources are in Portuguese, the article still fails WP:V (since non-Portuguese-speaking readers of the English WP cannot verify the content of the article), which maybe could be brought up as a reason for deletion in the future? Pan Dan 21:25, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, WP:V does not say that sources should be in English. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English, for example. Obviously, English sources are preferred, but of course for a Brasilian phenomenon we should not be surprised to find all, or almost all, of the sources in Portuguese. Anyway, this article can and should be massively cleaned up; I'm going to work on that a bit myself. -- Deville (Talk) 21:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, I see that Wp:rs#Sources in languages other than English says specifically that non-English sources are acceptable where no English sources are available. Thanks for pointing me there. Pan Dan 21:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! :D -- Deville (Talk) 21:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request[edit]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I may have found your page based on your contributions or your link repair user box on your user page. If you are not a member, please consider including your name on the project page. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of 53/6/0. I am equally elated and humbled by my new capacity as administrator of Wikipedia, and I send my heartfelt thanks for your unflinching support. If you need me for anything, just ask me! With gratitude, 210physicq (c) 04:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA thanks[edit]

Hi, Deville! Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 75/0/1! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Feel free to send me a message if you need any assistance. :)

--Coredesat 16:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at Wikipedia:Recently_created_admins#Durova. Warmly, Durova 14:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Samora Machel's fatal aircrash[edit]

You added a "fact" template to the Samora Machel article suggesting that the withdrawal of the Soviet Union and Mozambique from the international board of inquiry into the aircrash be regarded as speculative. Paragraph 24 of the referenced TRC report into the incident says:

"The day after the crash, Mozambique and South Africa agreed that an international board of inquiry should be established with the participation of the International Civil Aviation Organisation. According to the Chicago Convention, South Africa, as the state on whose territory the crash had occurred, would head up the investigation. South Africa was, however, obliged to work in partnership with the state of ownership (Mozambique) and the state of manufacture (the Soviet Union). These countries were not, however, taken on as equal partners, and withdrew their participation after the initial stages."

Would you like to remove the tag, or should I do so?Phase4 09:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chairlunchdinner, DCNanny and Markos Moulitsas[edit]

While I agree with you that the edits don't qualify as blockable vandalism, I think that DCNanny's actions qualify as socialism. Whether you love Markos or hate him, there's nothing to indicate that he holds anything near socialist positions. His readers are mostly liberals, he's a partisan democrat, but most of his positions are centrist or libertarian. DCNanny is inserting false, unsupported information into an article. And, while I don't see "socialist" as a slur, especially in a US context it tends to be seen that way. Re-inserting flase information 14 times is definitely problematic behaviour. Guettarda 15:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gamestah Deletion Review[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gamestah. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Alfreido 06:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MedCabal[edit]

Hi, we have a heavy backload of cases at WP:MEDCAB and since you are on the mediator list I thought I would request your help. Thanks! --Ideogram 10:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what you mean by "a lot of articles"; this is the only category I have redirected (in [my] recent memory) because it had only one entry (David Bard); I exhaustively searched Wikipedia and Google and he is the only person I could locate who was born in Adams County, Pennsylvania (much of which is now part of York County, Pennsylvania), and therefore I redirected to the generic Category:People from Pennsylvania. I did not touch the List of people from York, Pennsylvania, which I had recommended for speedy deletion, that only had one name as you observed yourself, and you updated it.

Personally, from what I have observed there are numerous categories which contain only one or two entries (or which were actually created with just one person in mind) and should be consolidated or redirected.

Please let me know if I am doing something incorrectly.

Hope Springs Eternal 17:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. - Oops, I just remembered - I did create Category:People from Polk County, Florida myself, but after I realized that Lakeland, Florida is part of Polk County - the largest part - and had already (previously) been created as a separate category, the Polk County category made no sense, so I redirected to a new category I created, Category:People from Bartow, Florida, as it was that city, with only one exception, that was the birthplace of all the other entries from the defunct Category:People from Polk County, Florida.

Hope you could follow that. Hope Springs Eternal 17:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Silicon Investor[edit]

Re: "Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Silicon Investor. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted."

It wasn't a test. I think Silicon Investor is an important enough web site to justify an entry in Wikipedia. "Silicon Investor" gets 111,000 hits in Google. It has over 23 million posts from thousands of users. Its no Yahoo or Google in terms of usage but I'm sure the site gets more traffic then a number of sites that do have articles here. True the content was limited but I would have thought at least a discussion before deletion would be warranted rather than a speedy deletion. Twfowler 16:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't feel that it has enough sufficient context to be have an entry. I read over WP:SCHOOL, and it doesn't seem like it's enough, either. I'm going to list it as an afd to get a better consensus. --Adam Riley Talk 04:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Thank you for removing the speedy delete tag originally! Your vote for whether or not the article would be ok to keep would be greatly appreciated at the deletion page for it. (Note: I have fleshed out the article more to provide more content, and I plan on doing even more in the future on it) Thanks! (Cardsplayer4life 06:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Shendurjana Ghat[edit]

Removing the speedy tag seems fine. Now it's certainly a worthwhile stub. NatusRoma | Talk 17:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I send a note to the creator, who seems to be a very new user, as well... hopefully they will contribute more to the article in the future. Thanks again! --- Deville (Talk) 17:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the speedy deletion tag from The Wayout, as the article seems to me to assert that its subject is notable ("it is one of London's better known transgender venues"). Also see the comments on the Talk page. You're free to ask another admin for review, or to take the matter to prod or AfD. Ask me if you have any questions. --Slowking Man 21:18, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after looking at the links provided on the talk page, I definitely agree that this is not a CSD A7 candidate. It needs some categories and to be stubbed properly (I don't know what the correct stub would be here). --- Deville (Talk) 23:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Deville/Archive 4, thank you for participating in my RfA which passed on 13th December 2006 with a tally of 49/10/5. Whilst I am delighted by the result and a little daunted; I appreciate the various comments re lack of experience in some aspects and I shall be cautious in my use of the new tools. I am well aware that becoming an Admin is not just about a successful nomination, but a continuing process of gaining further experience and I should welcome your feedback on any Admin tasks I become involved with. Again, many thanks for taking the time to consider my RfA and cast your kindly phrased views :-) Feel free to contact me if you need any assistance. :-) David Ruben 02:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

Hello Deville..

I need help from you. Recently I created an article "Ganapathi Sachchidananda" which you cleaned and made it look better. Later other people added material to it, who violated copyrights. Admin Zoe deleted the article citing copyvio. But he also said the bio is about a nonnotable person. I remember you helping me in recovering the article from speedy deletion when I started it,and u said its genuine. How can an article aproved by one admin become nonsense for other admin? Please help me with this. I request you to revert it back when you last edited it and with no copyvio. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganapathi_Sachchidananda please help..Thanks..

My reasoning for speedy was that, while he did appear on the stamp the article didn't seem to say how he was notable - the expansion tag is probably a better one to use than my speedy.

(While I did google him, I didn't use an umlaut - which is perhaps why I didn't get any useful results) shas 00:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recordings preserved in the National Recording Registry[edit]

You have contributed as an editor to the List of recordings preserved in the United States National Recording Registry. It is undergoing an overhaul according to the recent peer review that generated the following feedback. In addition to the changes there, it is undergoing stylistic changes that prevail at lists that have been selected as featured lists. Conversion to wikitable format began with 2002 today because most articles that reach featured list status are in this format. Feel free to convert additional years, add more columns, or add further details. Hopefully many of the editors who have helped edit this page to its pre review state will help improve it to a featured list quality level. I may not return to make further edits until next week. TonyTheTiger 21:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A very Californian RfA thanks from Luna Santin[edit]

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of (97/4/4)! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words -- so, a very belated thank you for all of your kind words.

I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of advice, this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, "Yeah, that guy was an admin." Hopefully then they don't start talking about the explosive ArbComm case I got tied into and oh what a drama that was, but we'll see, won't we?

Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback here or here -- help me become the best editor and sysop I can be.

Again, thank you. –Luna Santin

Glad to see you still edit, now and then. :) I appreciated your trust, back then, and I still do. Thank you. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old deletion[edit]

I just noticed this:

 08:56, 11 September 2006 Deville (Talk | contribs) deleted "Windows rot" (deleting per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berkeley of the West)

Out of curiosity, was that a mistake, or did that RFA have something to do with it? Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 08:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on other user's talk page -- Deville (Talk) 15:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Sorry, I meant to revert the changes my friend made, but you were too quick. Slow down there; I mean Jesus no harm. I love him! Crispus 04:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup[edit]

The Brooklyn Bridge New York City Meetup


Next: Saturday November 3rd, Brooklyn Museum area
Last: 8/12/2007
This box: view  talk  edit

The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there! --Pharos 20:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Central League Logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Central League Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pacific League Logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pacific League Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New mailing list[edit]

There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 20:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited![edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday March 16th, Columbia University area
Last: 1/13/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 02:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Kaka[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kaka, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rgoodermote  13:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I thought it was a vandal page by mistake. Rgoodermote  13:18, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008[edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday June 1st, Columbia University area
Last: 3/16/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--  jj137 (talk) 02:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic[edit]

Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis Take Manhattan[edit]

Wikis Take Manhattan


Next: Saturday September 27
This box: view  talk  edit

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Wikipedia creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

349 W. 12th St. #3
Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop

FOR UPDATES

Check out:

This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October Baseball WikiProject Newsletter[edit]

--  jj137 (talk) 23:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: You are invited![edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday November 16th, Columbia University area
Last: 6/01/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday January 18th, Columbia University area
Last: 11/01/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NYC Meetup: You're invited![edit]

New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza


Next: February 6-7, at the Met Museum and the Brooklyn Museum
Last: 01//2008
This box: view  talk  edit

Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited![edit]

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, sign official incorporation papers for the chapter, review recent projects like Wikipedia Loves Art and upcoming projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the January meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited...[edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday May 17th, Columbia University area
Last: 03/29/2009
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]