Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hispanics and religion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hispanics and religion[edit]
This article is content from other articles about Hispanic religions, mixed with such editorial opinion as "several Protestant denominations (particularly Evangelical ones) have vigorously proselytized in Hispanic communities." I would say "merge," but again, the content is already in the other articles present in the "Latinos and Hispanics in the United States" family of articles. (It is for these reasons that Hispanics and Politics is also up for deletion.) Delete as entirely unsourced POV or redundant content. JDoorjam Talk 05:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. After looking at the article, it seems that there is a lot of POV going on, and many of the external links go to suspiciously similar sites for translation services. None of the external links appear to provide a basis for the article. The subject matter itself isn't of much value on its own, since it already exists in other articles. Kevin 18:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Kevin. Danny Lilithborne 22:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete POV, unverifiable, sources refer to the Hispanics in the United States thus not even conforming to the article itself. Simply no. --Húsönd 23:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. For all the same reasons the article Hispanics and Politics (vfd) will stay on Wikipedia.--JuanMuslim 1m 01:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Your main reason for keeping Hispanics and Politics (which by the way should have been deleted and is likely to be relisted in the near future) was "the article is basically a cut and paste work off the main article on Hispanics". I find it hard to comprehend why would redundancy serve as a reason for keeping an article. How come you consider that such odd justifications for keeping the hispanic politics article should apply here? The reasons provided for deletion between the two do not even entirely conform.--Húsönd 02:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.