User talk:Deadpool100

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Deadpool100. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charts[edit]

Hi, how are you?

If Blurryface reached Billboard 200's number one spot, why it isn't listed on the chart history, then?

Cheers, MYS 77 ^✉ 05:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MYS77, that's what the article I gave was for. Those articles (from the same sources that give you the chart history), give a preview of what was to come. It's a reliable source, we can take it. -- Deadpool100 (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is reliable, but isn't it better to wait until it really reaches the chart? Just a question. Happy week, MYS 77 ^✉ 14:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It could be better, MYS77, but that is a source that can be used. Earlier sources are better, since it's from Billboard, it's not expected to change in one day. -- Deadpool100 (talk) 16:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos[edit]

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		On yet another day when wikipedia is an outlet for users to express their outrage at a celebrity, it is nice to have a new editor trying to understand and help apply wikipedia's polices of WP:BLP, WP:NPOV and WP:RS. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Abecedare. I was an ip editor for a bit, then made an account when I had some understanding of policy. -- Deadpool100 (talk) 04:56, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for evading the block on the Joseph Prasad account. The block on that account has been extended to December 2nd as a result. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

—Kww(talk) 14:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about, Kww? I don't even know what you're talking about here. The user retired, so how would that be me? We have both edited the Drake Bell article, but my main focus is Discography articles. -- Deadpool100 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that anyone that researches your contribution history vs. Joseph Prasad's will have any doubt as to what I am talking about.—Kww(talk) 01:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was quite a few articles I touched. I'm sure he didn't have all the same. Isn't there supposed to be consensus or some investigation for this kind of thing? -- Deadpool100 (talk) 01:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This and this should have been giveaways... in hindsight, of course. <sigh> Abecedare (talk) 01:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at the Drake Bell article and noticed someone who had many major edits to the article (saying it lightly) who appeared to not edit it anymore. Is there something wrong with asking what happened? I'm new and didn't even know what blocking was (or was a thing) until yesterday. And looking into it, I thought evading a block was an indefinite offense. Why wasn't he blocked indef too? -- Deadpool100 (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to appeal, just follow the instructions in the block notice.—Kww(talk) 02:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, didn't actually know about that. So do I just copy that onto my talk page? -- Deadpool100 (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not quite "copy": actually saying "Your reason here" won't be very convincing.—Kww(talk) 03:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought that part was obvious. But alright. -- Deadpool100 (talk) 03:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]