User talk:ClareNoI

This is ClareNoI's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Parks-Valleta has been accepted[edit]

Robert Parks-Valleta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

EROS ^message 12:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marvin Nuecklaus (January 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Largely unsourced; IMDB not a valid source per WP:RSPS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ClareNoI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse re propaganda[edit]

Thank you for your leads regarding where else I can find answers to my questions and for your explanation of DS. I am surprised someone was happily reporting me to DS for asking questions. I believe he is also semi-retired just like one of my edit-reversers. Perhaps I should also do some reporting of my own.70.164.212.36 (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Declined is not Rejected[edit]

Reviewers decline drafts that they believe have potential, whereas Rejected is reserved to drafts with no hope. David notMD (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 09:23, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marvin Nuecklaus (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need in-depth coverage about him and blogs are generally not reliable sources so should be avoided.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus[edit]

Hello, ClareNoI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marvin Nuecklaus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]