User talk:Cielquiparle/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fielding[edit]

Good to meet in Lincoln Inn’s Field. While you’re here, please check out the turnstilesAndrew🐉(talk) 12:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise. (Wow, this "Reply" tool is great!) Thanks for the pointers today. Cielquiparle (talk) 18:18, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was really great to meet you at the weekend, thanks for coming! the wub "?!" 20:48, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The wub, thanks for organising! Cielquiparle (talk) 07:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Cielquiparle, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Mojoworker (talk) 22:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cielquiparle, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Cielquiparle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Sibley[edit]

Yes, Sibley was promoted to Brigadier in the Union Army, but the Union Army was composed of two parts: Regular Army (most general officers being West Point grads), and the much larger force of United States Volunteers. Brevet ranks further complicate the situation (Sibley was brevetted to Major general, USV after the end of the Civil War). Let me know if you have questions. Mojoworker (talk) 22:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

6th Minnesota[edit]

Really like your contributions to Battle of Birch Coulee. Where did you find the Federal muster in information for the 6th Minnesota? I could use that ref for Fort Ridgely for sure and maybe Fort Snelling. Is the muster into Federal service listed for the other Minnesota units: 7th, 8th Infantry and 3rd Artillery in particular. Thank you. 2601:448:8301:25B0:40FC:11F2:5994:BCA9 (talk) 01:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)mcb133aco2601:448:8301:25B0:40FC:11F2:5994:BCA9 (talk) 01:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson, Charles W. (1890–93). "Narrative of the Sixth Regiment". In Minnesota Board of Commissioners on Publication of History of Minnesota in Civil and Indian Wars; Flandrau, Charles Eugene (eds.). Minnesota in the civil and Indian wars 1861-1865. St. Paul: Printed for the state by the Pioneer Press Co. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.Mcb133aco (talk) 02:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 02:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Hello! I wanted to commend you for your excellent work on this: Azayamankawin. Hope to see you around! Netherzone (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Netherzone! Very exciting. :) Cielquiparle (talk) 10:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Azayamankawin[edit]

On 21 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Azayamankawin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that photographers in Saint Paul, Minnesota, sold thousands of cartes-de-visite of "Old Betz" (pictured), a Dakota woman who they said was 120 years old? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Azayamankawin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Azayamankawin), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 11,002 views (916.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 21:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Cielquiparle! Thanks for the review of the article, i appreciate that you stuck through a review that took almost a month. A small note: The nominator requested that their hook be ran on October 5, and you approved the nomination on October 4. When the approving tick comes within about a week of the date request, it's best to raise a flag on WT:DYK and maybe even ping a few admins, so that they can put it into the queues on time. No big deal, just something to note for next time. Thanks again! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/them) 23:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]