User talk:CharlesBNB
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hubert Godart has been accepted[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ca talk to me! 09:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Deletion discussion about Wallo Brands[edit]
Hello CharlesBNB, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Wallo Brands, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wallo Brands.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
BuySomeApples (talk) 03:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
February 2024[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Americans of English descent, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 14:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Schazjmd, Noted and thank you. CharlesBNB (talk) 18:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Scholaro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 09:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Your page Georg Weissacher[edit]
Hi, thanks for the newly created article. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Citation overkill and try to avoid adding a disproportionate amount of references to support your statements. Note that the presence of many citations can be counterproductive: not only does citation overkill impact the readability of an article, it can call the notability of the subject into question by editors
. Broc (talk) 12:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Broc, thanks for the explanation. I have removed overkilling citations to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. CharlesBNB (talk) 13:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Except you didn't really fix the issue. There are six references to support the relatively uncontroversial statement "He is the founder of the fashion labels POAN (Peoples of All Nations)". Just pick your best reliable secondary source, no need to add six of them. Same applies for most other citations on the page. If you want to add additional reading material that you think is important but you don't know where to source in-line, you can put it in a "further reading" section. Broc (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have removed the unnecessary sources and picked the secondary sources. Please let me know if it stills need to be fixed. CharlesBNB (talk) 14:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Except you didn't really fix the issue. There are six references to support the relatively uncontroversial statement "He is the founder of the fashion labels POAN (Peoples of All Nations)". Just pick your best reliable secondary source, no need to add six of them. Same applies for most other citations on the page. If you want to add additional reading material that you think is important but you don't know where to source in-line, you can put it in a "further reading" section. Broc (talk) 13:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:The photo of Georg Weissacher was clicked by the photographer Mariano Vivanco.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:The photo of Georg Weissacher was clicked by the photographer Mariano Vivanco.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://www.linkedin.com/in/georg-weissacher-09071646/overlay/photo/ and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Broc (talk) 13:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to XJ Music. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~ A412 talk! 01:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Shayamal Vallabhjee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sources are passing mentions, interviews, profiles and some of them are not even reliable. There is no significant coverage in third party reliable sources that discuss the subject directly and in details. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS 💬 15:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation @GSS. I have removed the proposed deletion because several third-party sources discussing the subject directly are deemed reliable for establishing notability. His presence is also acknowledged on other Wikipedia pages like (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kings_XI_Punjab_in_2018) and (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_2018_Indian_Premier_League_personnel_changes). CharlesBNB (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Shayamal Vallabhjee for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shayamal Vallabhjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.GSS 💬 04:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Baltic Studios[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Baltic Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 15:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: XJ music (March 17)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XJ music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, CharlesBNB!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ANUwrites 22:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: XJ music (March 28)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:XJ music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Baltic Studios (April 1)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baltic Studios and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, CharlesBNB. Thank you for your work on Akuma Saningong. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Notability via WP:BIO is met through listing on 'top 100' lists in reputable German sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, CharlesBNB. Thank you for your work on Renzo Vitale. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
One of the problems with giving multiple references (excessive citations) is that it makes it clear that most of the references are the result of churnalism. So, I suggest being more selective with the referencing, preferring the language version of article in the language of the project (in this case, English). There's also quite a lot of repetition between section, so the current version could do with a bit of a prune!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 20:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Klbrain, thanks for your insights! I agree that being more selective with references and favoring the English language version of articles will help alleviate the issue of churnalism and improve clarity. I will work on pruning the repetitive sections to streamline the content. CharlesBNB (talk) 17:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024[edit]
Hello CharlesBNB. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CharlesBNB. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CharlesBNB|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Do you have any paid editing to declare? Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 17:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:CharlesBNB, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CharlesBNB|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 14:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I am going to disclose my paid editing for one page because I was paid for only one page, the rest aren't paid. Should I disclose this template {{paid|user=CharlesBNB|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}} on my talk page? CharlesBNB (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Mikko Kärkkäinen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No claim of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Paid editing again[edit]
You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 15:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Paid editing final request for disclosure[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Theroadislong, I am going to declare the paid editing. Thank you. CharlesBNB (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you still have not disclosed paid editing, why is that?
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 02:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)- I wasn't aware that how to disclose on the talk page. Due to time zone I wasn't available. I am going to disclose it now but I am unable due to blockage. CharlesBNB (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- You have been told how to do so at the Teahouse and on your talk page, and you have been warned multiple times. It also seems that you have been blocked for sockpuppetry. You don't have your talk page edit rights revoked, so you can always disclose so now.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 01:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)- I comprehend the situation, but regrettably, I was unavailable when this transpired. Upon my return, I discovered that my account had already been blocked. As for the allegation of sockpuppetry, I have no direct involvement with the other account; it belongs to my brother. Should the editors require it, I am willing to divulge information about my brother's account as well. I operate with integrity, unaware of the requirement for payment disclosure, and this incident marks my first and final foray into paid editing. It feels unjust to have my other pages deleted, especially those for which I was not contracted. I have already submitted a request for unblocking, and I sincerely hope to be granted one last chance. CharlesBNB (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- You were in no way "unaware". Other editors have warned you multiple times on your talk page and have informed you how to disclose so. You even replied to one of the warnings above, yet didn't use the template on your user page.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 04:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)- Carefully note that I wasn't online. If I got unblocked, I will disclose. I have replied to three times, see carefully. CharlesBNB (talk) 04:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- You were in no way "unaware". Other editors have warned you multiple times on your talk page and have informed you how to disclose so. You even replied to one of the warnings above, yet didn't use the template on your user page.
- I comprehend the situation, but regrettably, I was unavailable when this transpired. Upon my return, I discovered that my account had already been blocked. As for the allegation of sockpuppetry, I have no direct involvement with the other account; it belongs to my brother. Should the editors require it, I am willing to divulge information about my brother's account as well. I operate with integrity, unaware of the requirement for payment disclosure, and this incident marks my first and final foray into paid editing. It feels unjust to have my other pages deleted, especially those for which I was not contracted. I have already submitted a request for unblocking, and I sincerely hope to be granted one last chance. CharlesBNB (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- You have been told how to do so at the Teahouse and on your talk page, and you have been warned multiple times. It also seems that you have been blocked for sockpuppetry. You don't have your talk page edit rights revoked, so you can always disclose so now.
- I wasn't aware that how to disclose on the talk page. Due to time zone I wasn't available. I am going to disclose it now but I am unable due to blockage. CharlesBNB (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you still have not disclosed paid editing, why is that?
Nomination of Pierre Gervois for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pierre Gervois, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Gervois until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Mikko Kärkkäinen for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikko Kärkkäinen, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikko Kärkkäinen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Bed Kingdom for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bed Kingdom, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bed Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024[edit]
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
- Hi @Firefly, I am unable to disclose the paid editing due to account blockage. Could you please let me know, how can I do it now? CharlesBNB (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
CharlesBNB (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made a mistake by not disclosing my paid editing. I was hired for a single page, and now I want to disclose it on my talk page. From now on, I will not engage in paid editing work, and if I do, I will disclose it on my talk page. Furthermore, I will never move an article directly to the main space; instead, I will submit each article for review. I confirm that I have read and understand the Terms of Use and the requirements for disclosing paid editing. CharlesBNB (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I find the conversation below compelling enough to decline your request. Both the "brother" explanation and the "Don't mess with my articles. Wikipedia is not your property" comment are unimpressive. Note that I've blocked your Itsmehesse account as well. Ponyobons mots 19:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I Confirm that I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- I have been compensated for my work on a single project (Iulia and Delia), for which I will disclosed on my talk page. I want to emphasize that I have no affiliation or conflict of interest with any other subject I have written about or created.
- User:Elizzzzz is not directly my account, this is my brother's account, If I also need to disclose it on my talk page so I can declare it as well. Please tell me the procedure to do so.
- In editing such topics in the future, I plan to follow a systematic approach. This involves conducting thorough research to ensure accuracy and completeness of information. I will also strive to maintain a neutral tone and adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Additionally, I will be open to feedback and collaboration, ensuring that the final draft meets the standards of quality expected for Wikipedia articles. CharlesBNB (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Your brother also writes articles that other editors suspect for paid editing and conflict of interest? Remarkable coincidence. — Biruitorul Talk 05:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Don't mess with my articles. Wikipedia is not your property. CharlesBNB (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- You are also paid editor I know, do not send irrelevant messages to me. If me and my brother are suspected paid editors so proof it before saying any crap. Non-sense Spammer. CharlesBNB (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- One, the articles are not "your articles". But I am concerned that your unblock request was written with a large language model (such as Chat GPT). Is this the case? HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 15:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- All the article are written by me, I can show you the proof as I have all the drafts which I have written. The unblock request was just rephrased by the Chatgbt. Why everyone is concerning about the things that doesn't makes sense. I don't know why the editors are not reviewing my unlock request? I will be happy with the editors result whether they unblock my account or not. What I have to day that I made only one mistake to not disclose the paid editing for a page for which I was hired. CharlesBNB (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Administrators care about this because they want to see that you understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, not whether an LLM understands them. An unblock request puts admins in a position in which they put their reputation on the line by trusting you, so they're going to want to make sure that they can, in fact, trust you. Using a chatbot is a very poor way to earn that trust, as is talking about "my articles." CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- All the article are written by me, I can show you the proof as I have all the drafts which I have written. The unblock request was just rephrased by the Chatgbt. Why everyone is concerning about the things that doesn't makes sense. I don't know why the editors are not reviewing my unlock request? I will be happy with the editors result whether they unblock my account or not. What I have to day that I made only one mistake to not disclose the paid editing for a page for which I was hired. CharlesBNB (talk) 21:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- One, the articles are not "your articles". But I am concerned that your unblock request was written with a large language model (such as Chat GPT). Is this the case? HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 15:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- One other point, if I may. You claim User:Elizzzzz belongs to your brother, yet that user page says “My name is Elizabeth”. Are you saying your brother is named Elizabeth? — Biruitorul Talk 06:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think they have returned as User:Sword-Emperor-dev. Aszx5000 (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- I dont know exactly why im mentioned, but I am not related to any person above. I am but a simple Game-Dev Student from Hamburg. I somewhat know Akuma Saningong and wouldnt wish for this article to be deleted. No money or other payment is involved. Sword-Emperor-dev (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
The article Ralph Bernstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotional; article creator has been banned for paid editing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: XJ music (April 15)[edit]
Nomination of Ralph Bernstein for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Bernstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.UtherSRG (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Akuma Saningong[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Akuma Saningong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. UtherSRG (talk) 00:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Akuma Saningong for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akuma Saningong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.UtherSRG (talk) 10:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Renzo Vitale for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renzo Vitale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.UtherSRG (talk) 12:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Georg Weissacher for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georg Weissacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.