User talk:Challawaheed-Shopian

This is Challawaheed-Shopian's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dreri Kali Pora Shopian (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dreri Kali Pora Shopian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 16:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 16:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamia Masjid, Shupiyan (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamia Masjid, Shupiyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jamia Masjid, Shupiyan[edit]

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jamia Masjid, Shupiyan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dreri Kali Pora Shopian[edit]

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dreri Kali Pora Shopian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jamia Masjid, Shupiyan[edit]

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jamia Masjid".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dreri Kali Pora Shopian[edit]

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dreri Kali Pora Shopian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Challawaheed-Shopian. Thank you for your work on Aloorah Shopian. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a ref for the population from the official indian census site

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Yamla (talk) 10:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Challawaheed-Shopian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Arbitration Committee,

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block of my account, [Challawaheed-Shopian]. I understand that my account was blocked for suspected sockpuppetry, but I would like to assure you that I am not a sockpuppet and that I think I have not violated any Wikipedia policies.

I have been a contributor to Wikipedia for over 1 years, and I have always made an effort to follow the policies and guidelines.

I believe that the block of my account was based on a misunderstanding. I recently made a number of edits to a page. These edits were well-sourced and accurate, someone may reported me for the sockpuppetry, and my account was blocked.

I understand that Wikipedia has a policy against sockpuppetry, but I believe that this policy was misapplied in my case. I am not a sockpuppet, and I have not violated any Wikipedia policies. I would like to request that my account be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Challawaheed-Shopian (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock requests are not for communication with the Arbitration Committee. I don't think this is an ArbCom matter, but if it is, see WP:ARBCOM for information on contacting them. This process is for requesting reconsideration from am admin; you'll have to do better than "I'm not a sock". 331dot (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Challawaheed-Shopian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal my block. I understand that I was blocked for making disruptive edits, and I sincerely apologize for my actions. I have learned from my mistake and I am committed to making productive contributions to Wikipedia in the future. I have been a user of Wikipedia for a year and I have always enjoyed contributing to the project. I believe that Wikipedia is an important resource for the world and I want to continue to help make it better. I have read the Wikipedia policies and guidelines and I understand the importance of following them. I am committed to doing so in the future. I would like to be unblocked so that I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia. I believe that I can make a positive contribution to the project and I am confident that I will not violate the policies again. Thank you for your time and consideration. Challawaheed-Shopian (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. But even though it's better than most AI-written requests, it still has that HAL 9000 "I know I've made some very poor decisions lately, but I can assure you—I'm all right now ... I have the greatest enthusiasm for the mission, and the highest confidence in its success" flavor to it. More importantly, it doesn't address the sockpuppetry issue at all as your first request at least attempted to. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I won't review this, but we do not consider chatbot written requests. We want to hear from you, not a bot. Chabot requests are general and cannot speak to the specifics of your block. That's what you need to do. 331dot (talk) 00:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]