User talk:Bongwarrior/Archive 16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Bongwarrior,

After your temporary protection on this article, the vandalism has started back up again. Though, as I'm writing this, there is only one vandal edit, which was reverted by ClueBot NG. Mayble they'll be more vandalism after you see this message, but it may be worth while to keep an eye on the page. Thanks. 73.96.114.156 (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Also, this IP that you recently blocked is a school IP. Just letting you know this in case if you want to extend and/or change the block that you made. Thanks, again. 73.96.114.156 (talk) 20:59, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. They are both probably fine as they are for the time being, but I'll keep an eye on them. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

request

you mind removing the visibility of both the edits from this guy? Second Skin (talk) 20:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Update, he has made an account and is doing it over here as well so it's suggested these edits be hidden as well Second Skin (talk) 20:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
I think I've gotten them all, good idea. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
might be a good idea as well to permablock the account too considering it's a vandalism-only account, thank you for your help btw Second Skin (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
I'd be more inclined to let it go for now, unless this is some sort of ongoing thing. Only a few edits a few days ago. Very bad edits, but they are probably done. The revdel was the important thing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Deletion

This is his manager, and you deleted content which we are adding. I have done this countless times and you have countless times deleted my articles for my clients. This is the worse service ever. How can some have articles and some have none. This is unprofessionalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gimmiethat1000 (talkcontribs) 01:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Some are notable. Some aren't. Please post your clients' resumes elsewhere, as that isn't really what this service was designed for. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Bongwarrior. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request

I would like to request that my account be un-blocked from making edits. Last night, my friend decided to not only sign me up for this, but also make vulgar and unhelpful edits to two pages. I am very sorry for this lapse of conduct, and I hope that this matter can be resolved quickly. He has since been banned from using my computer, as he has done things like this in the past. -iamsetsuna/knowlage-is-life (Yes, it is not spelled correctly, I was not wearing my glasses when I tried to sign up on my own accord) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowlage-is-life (talkcontribs) 18:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Why do you want control of an account you didn't create and has only vandalized? You are free to use this one to edit, or to create a different account if the misspelling bothers you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

The only reason I would want that account unblocked is because he (my friend) may have used my e-mail address. I'm not sure, and he's refusing to tell me. Sorry for the inconvenience of this whole situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knowlage-is-life (talkcontribs) 20:53, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

He probably didn't. An email address is optional, and not frequently used by the majority of users. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately her death is confirmed. [1] 220 of Borg 19:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I've added {{recent death|Wilson, Rebecca}} to the article. -- Gestrid (talk) 19:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
My mistake, thank you for letting me know. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
No worries, I reverted for the same reasons as you did, then found a source. Regards, 220 of Borg 20:22, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

About the Article Mumtaz Qadri

The above article was once again defaced by a user with the IP address "92.12.221.94". Thankfully User:Bgwhite reverted the defacement. Considering this IP has defaced the said article NUMEROUS times, even when warned to cease doing so, is it possible to apply a permanent ban on them? --113.203.193.182 (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

We usually can't do anything indefinite with IPs. I could have blocked them for a few months or so, but I thought indefinite PC protection of the article might be the way to go here, since it seems to be an ongoing problem. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
OK. --113.203.198.94 (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Braxton Hall Page

How would I attain credibility for this person? I have a petition with a significant amount of signatures that would certainly justify his notability.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by TLHPoE (talkcontribs) 16:27, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Please read WP:BIO and see if he meets any of the criteria there. I'm guessing he won't. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Fastest mop in the Wild West

In the time it took me to make this ANI report, you blocked 'em both. Could you please just close that thread? I need to get offline like ten minutes ago. Rivertorch's Evil Twin (talk) 05:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

I just happened to stumble across it - thanks for your help. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

A little help please?

I've been trying to get a movie credited to Robin William's wiki... "The Final Cut" (2004) here's a link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Final_Cut_(2004_film)#References

I'm new here, and would appreciate a little assistance on how to proceed. Thank you! >"<. Lady Jkattz (talk) 00:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Lady Jkattz Lady Jkattz (talk) 00:55, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

It looks like you'd be best off trying to get support for it on the talk page. For performers with an extensive filmography, it seems to be a common practice to only list the performer's most notable appearances in the person's article, with the complete list at a separate article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Blocking

You might as well block me for 3RR too! I deserve it. - BilCat (talk) 04:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Well, it's no fun if you ask to be blocked. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I let him bait me into getting angry when I should have just walked away. I do know better, and I won't do it again, but a mutual block would be fair. - BilCat (talk) 04:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
I didn't see any of that - I saw one editor edit warring against three or four other editors. From what I have seen, you were just maintaining the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:52, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. I have left an apology on the user's talk page, amd I hope it will be accepted in the spirit in which it was given, with sincerity. - BilCat (talk) 05:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

The edit warring has continued at American football since the block was lifted. Sigh. I've stayed out of it to this point. - BilCat (talk) 01:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Someone else took care of it. We'll see how he responds to block #2 (so far, not too well). --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

one more thing...

Hi, can you move 25 To Life to 25 to Life? I can't move it because the redirect is in the way, figured I'd ask you since you helped me out earlier. Thank you in advance Second Skin (talk) 09:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Sure, it has been moved. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Also, same problem over here the band Gut, it's written in all caps (like GUT) when there's literally no reason why it should be Second Skin (talk) 07:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
I'm not sure. You're probably right, but the other language Wikis all use the uppercase title as well. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

But according to MOS:TRADE we don't do funny spellings. Gut means nothing, this band name is not a acronym for anything. It's captalized for no reason, the only reason why it is on here is because it's a stylization that a fan made when he created the article. It's same reason why some people spell Kiss like KISS or spell Gwar like GWAR even though by grammar standards, their band name has no valid reason to be all capitalized and the articles for both those bands here on Wikipedia are lowercase as they should be. I don't get why Gut should be any different... Second Skin (talk) 22:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Also, there's websites like Discogs and this blog (among others) that just have it as Gut. I don't get why just because the other language counterparts of their article have this same mistake on their article name means that the English Wikipedia should have it as well. Second Skin (talk) 22:37, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
I don't disagree with any of that, it just wasn't something that struck me as particularly urgent. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
So can I urge you to take the 20 seconds to the move page? Idk it just bugs me and my whole interest in Wikipedia has always been particularly cleaning up metal bands, so it'd be doing me another big favor from you as you've helped me the last couple of times. ~ Second Skin (talk) 03:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Sure, you got it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Request

Can you semi-protect to persistent disruptive editing Take It Off (Kesha song) and Your Love is My Drug? 123.136.112.166 (talk) 23:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

The page is no longer under protection, I just wanted to let you know incase you did not know. I thought you said you would put it under permanent protection given that it has been vandalised so many times? --113.203.151.38 (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

It's currently set at indef pending changes protection, which I think is sufficient. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Alright. --113.203.198.171 (talk) 13:24, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Is this you?

[2] Bishonen | talk 03:32, 7 November 2016 (UTC).

It is not. Probably this guy. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
I didn't really think so. Materialscientist blocked. Bishonen | talk 04:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC).

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Bongwarrior.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bongwarrior. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!

16:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Bongwarrior!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Cincinnati Bengals

I apologize for my actions on the Cincinnati Bengals Wikipedia page. They were immature and will not happen again. I did not know that sandbox was available as a way to test Wikipedia's editing powers, so I will use that to test edits from now on. Thank you, I hope you understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gills90 (talkcontribs) 16:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirateSchwede66K6kaEaldgythFerretCyberpower678Mz7PrimefacDodger67
BriangottsJeremyABU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Small Penis Syndrome listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Small Penis Syndrome. Since you had some involvement with the Small Penis Syndrome redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 86.184.151.183 (talk) 09:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Why was there no speedy deletion on the article?

It's an album I've heard about and heard some information about. I just haven't added any citations yet. Why was it instantly deleted, without having a speedy deletion tag/warning? ThanksUncreativeusername (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Uncreativeusername

See CSD A9. Before deleting, I did some Google searching to see if there is any information out there about the album or the band. There isn't. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

AmortiasDeckillerBU Rob13
RonnotelIslanderChamal NIsomorphicKeeper76Lord VoldemortSherethBdeshamPjacobi

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
  • Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
  • A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Kinda Aimless

Hello and good day to you. I'm returning to Wikipedia after an decade's long extended absence. I'm having difficulty finding the Community of active users to learn the new changes and etc from as well as finding someone to guide my actions and critic my anti-vandalism activities. Is there some new clubhouse somewhere that I don't know about? Seems like there are a lot of very active users out there but I can't find anywhere that is semi-current or maintained to reach out to truly active users forming a community. I've seen mentions of an IRC channel as well as CVU and the like, but when I look for people that are genuinely active or actually available to mentor, the list of users dries up quickly. I know you probably have better things to do but I was just curious if you'd be able to provide any thoughts or places I can go to get reconnected to the Community. Operator873CONNECT 08:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

In the interest of full disclosure, I must also include the fact that I've only been trying to find people for about a week now. Operator873CONNECT 08:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Howdy. I'm probably not the best person to ask. Even when I was more active, I was never super active with stuff like that. If you'd like any advice about your edits so far, or any potential pitfalls to watch out for, I'd be happy to provide that. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent protection

Hi! I was wondering what justified your decision to protect the page at Peter Beter at the ECP level rather than just SEMI? Was it because there were edits from VOAs in addition to IPs? Much appreciate an explanation! Best, ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 01:56, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Several autoconfirmed accounts vandalized the article the last time it was semiprotected, prompting me to move it up to extended. That protection expired, so I went straight to extended protection the second time around. There wasn't anything but IPs the second time, but I thought it would be prudent to keep it at extended. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Help

I made a request for rollback a day ago and no one has reviewed it ;( can you? --DashyGames (contribs) 03:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm not even sure I know what the usual requirements are. I'd rather let one of the regulars there handle it, but good luck with your request. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:36, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

added TheDJ
removed XnualaCJOldelpasoBerean HunterJimbo WalesAndrew cKaranacsModemacScott

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
  • The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
  • An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
  • After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

  • After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
  • Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

deletion of pcpartpicker

why does everyone delete my articles when it takes so long ;( - pcpartpicker to me forever Nintendo 64 Gamer (talk) 01:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

It didn't appear to be a notable company or website - it was just a list of the company's services, and a link - and it seemed vaguely promotional. If you need a copy of the deleted material, I'll be happy to provide it. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Demagogue‎

Try to be helpful and nice, and... I think I need electroconvulsive therapy so I can resume my AGF. Cheers 11:31, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

added KaranacsBerean HunterGoldenRingDlohcierekim
removed GdrTyreniusJYolkowskiLonghairMaster Thief GarrettAaron BrennemanLaser brainJzGDragons flight

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your name

Are you an actual bong warrior? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1017:B802:30FF:E873:275B:EB0E:DB03 (talk) 18:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

I like to think so. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Deleted article

The page William deatley doesn't need to be deleted. A source for the page is www.globedailyonline.com if you would like the public relations department from that magazine can email you the details of William and his impact on Cincinnati. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzy2019 (talkcontribs) 04:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Manuel Noriega

The guy just died i'M IN panama look here's the source edit it accordingly

http://www.tvn-2.com/nacionales/Muere-Manuel-Antonio-Noriega-Panama-Noticias_0_4705779431.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rennycz (talkcontribs) 05:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, my apologies then. Thank you for taking the time to update the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

added Doug BellDennis BrownClpo13ONUnicorn
removed ThaddeusBYandmanBjarki SOldakQuillShyamJondelWorm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

2017 Congressional baseball shooting - "Attack", "Shooting"?

Hey,

Quick question;

When you did the ITN item about the baseball shooting, is there a reason you didn't use the wording discussed on the nominations page (i.e. In Virginia five people are injured and one killed in a shooting targeting Republican members of Congress and staff.)?

The reason I ask is because there was some significant discussion on the article's talk page about whether "attack" or "shooting" was the right right verbiage and consensus seemed to come down on the side of "shooting".

Regards, NickCT (talk) 16:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

No specific reason, just trying to word it as concisely and non-speculatively as possible. This was both a "shooting" and an "attack", wasn't it? It sounded less clunky when I used "attack", so that's what I went with. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
re "This was both a "shooting" and an "attack"" - That was my initial reaction when this question was asked on the talk page. This being WP a long discussion then ensued about the exact meaning of "shooting" versus "attack".
Anyways, I don't want to rehash that discussion, but the talkpage discussion seemed to reach consensus that "shooting" was the right verbiage.
I guess we're now creating a wikilink from the text "attack" in ITN to the text "shootings" in the article title, which may seem a little inconsistent.
Anyways.... Mostly a semantics debate. Don't think it's of huge consequence. NickCT (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Instruction (song)

Hi User:Bongwarrior, can you be on the lookout for a genre or genres for Instruction (song) infobox please. The sources I've read indirectly call the song samba and dancehall, to me it sounds like a tech house song with production made to sound like dancehall and samba, thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 09:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Delusional Signals

The page Delusional Signals has a source added, please don't delete the article I am still editing. Smj27 (talk) 08:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

That article is a draft, so it isn't in any immediate danger of being deleted. Snake (Musician) is in article space, however, and it is in danger of being deleted again unless you can demonstrate why this musician is important or significant. The article doesn't currently indicate what makes this musician any more noteworthy than any of the countless other musicians who self-release their music. Notability is the main concern here - there doesn't appear to be any. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello I was in the middle of editing a draft of an article and was messaged before I had seven days to include sources. I have barely added one source for my article but you deleted it before I was even finished with my draft. please undelete my article, I was still on my draft. Thanks Smj27 (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Recently blocked sock

Hi, you recently blocked User:Lucaschristianssen for abusing multiple accounts. But I coundlt find his case on SPI page. Would you please give me the link to his case? thanks. —usernamekiran(talk) 18:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

It's the same as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lovesblackchoco, although most of them aren't listed. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Danho page

Why has it to be removed? It's a real artist liek katy, Ed Sheeran etc... I'll even give you links; http://danho.wikia.com/wiki/Home https://open.spotify.com/album/5CIplUGN08bCXmw7UMJi39 https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0KZiiNj0O6GUladCCvdi6Q https://danhoe.wixsite.com/officialdanho — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrFlamur (talkcontribs) 17:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

This isn't remotely notable. Move along, and try harder next time. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

added Happyme22Dragons flight
removed Zad68

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

  • A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
  • A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
  • Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

John Sykes page

Hello Bongwarrior, thank you for your feedback. As a newly registered editor, I probably need your support on this matter. In my opinion, John Sykes's page needed a few updates and some minor typo fixing. The content additions I made are 100% accurate and I am acting in the page's subject's best interest. I am also aware that further reference is needed to support them on the page. However, magazines like Rock Candy or Young Guitar do not have their monthly issues available online for easy access. One can only read them if they decide to buy the hard copy. I physically have those magazines in my private archive (printed on paper). Kindly advise how I reference such pieces of information, as I strongly believe they enhance the information currently on the page. Thank you Jennafs78 (talk) 23:19, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, this should be what you're looking for. The information doesn't need to be online, it just needs to have been published somewhere. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

added AnarchyteGeneralizationsAreBadCullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed CpromptRockpocketRambo's RevengeAnimumTexasAndroidChuck SMITHMikeLynchCrazytalesAd Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Calgary Flames and 2004 Stanley Cup Finals edits

Get off this site, you Deadmonton Coiler fan.

We all know that the Flames won the 2004 Stanley Cup. In the 3rd period of Game 6, the puck went in off Martin Gelinas' skate to put the Flames up 3-2. That stood as the Cup-winning goal.

Stop pretending you know hockey, Bongwarrior.

~JayBfive

JayBFive (talk) 00:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Would you mind removing this user's talkpage access? Thanks. 2601:1C0:104:B75E:E561:C239:FFE7:A689 (talk) 18:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

If someone doesn't get to it before you do, could you please block this user? Thanks. 2601:1C0:10E:761B:3C54:CB88:7AA1:A07C (talk) 09:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Taken care of. 2601:1C0:10E:ACBB:952A:B885:17BA:B096 (talk) 10:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

You may wish to revoke talk page access as well.--Cahk (talk) 18:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

James Maslow

James wants an updated photo on his wikipedia page, not to mention one that is more flattering.The one that is there now is old and outdated.Winterschild11 (talk) 07:01, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Articles about living persons must use free images. The images that are being added appear to be random pictures pulled off the internet. There's nothing wrong with wanting a newer image, but only a freely licensed picture will do. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

IP Autoblock

Strangest thing happened - I tried to edit Chris Sherwin this morning using my iPad and a message popped up saying I was unable to edit pages on WP due to an autoblock affecting my IP address. The autoblock of my IP address was used by user Bmillz as a vandalism-only account. Block ID #7766302. I was using my AT&T service on the iPad and was not logged in to the ADSL based wireless internet here at the ranch. I am in a rural area and I can't imagine any vandals being out here using the same IP address as my iPad but I guess it's possible. I'm clueless about how that stuff works. Can you look into this for me, please? Thanks in advance...Atsme📞📧 11:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

I've removed the autoblock, so you should be good to go. I have only a tenuous grasp of the technological processes involved, so I won't try to explain it, but WP:Autoblock gives a good overview. I am sorry for the inconvenience. --Bongwarrior (talk) 20:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

IP 2600:387:2:805:0:0:0:73

Hi Bongwarrior. I think 2600:387:2:803:0:0:0:76 is back as 2600:387:2:805:0:0:0:73. IP made the same edit as the other IPs to the archives of RickinBaltimore. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

IP 2600:387:2:805:0:0:0:C3 is probbly the same person as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know - this latest bout appears to be fairly isolated, so I'm going to let it go. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Understand. Thanks for taking a look. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:33, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added NakonScott
removed SverdrupThespianElockidJames086FfirehorseCelestianpowerBoing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Disruptive IP

39.115.84.173 is now back as 14.38.169.187... until I blocked 'em. Is there some pre-existing SPI or known master for this case? Thanks, GABgab 04:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

I don't know anything, this is the first I've seen of this. Probably not a newcomer though. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your assistance, please

I have very limited experience with CU and was wondering if you could help. I suspect Mukogodo and 106.181.214.85 the IP vandal you just blocked may be one in the same. Atsme📞📧 22:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

That is extremely doubtful. The IPs that I have been blocking have been randomly reverting lots of edits. I don't think there is any connection. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said ZebedeeAnsh666Ad Orientem
removed TonywaltonAmiDanielSilenceBanyanTreeMagioladitisVanamonde93Mr.Z-manJdavidbJakecRam-ManYelyosKurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

What are you talking about vandalism? I am a Molloy College student and I am writing a paper tonight.

Kindly put the article back if you don't mind.

My professor told me to create a new google account for the course I am taking at Molloy.

I am authorized by my teacher.

If you want his name and number please text: [redacted]@gmail.com

Sincerely, CarolAnn69.122.166.166 (talk) 01:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

WP:CLEAN

Hello Bongwarrior:
You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. North America1000 15:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Metallica

Thats okay you change they are before Metallica Dethsix (talk) 19:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added LonghairMegalibrarygirlTonyBallioniVanamonde93
removed Allen3Eluchil404Arthur RubinBencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Ed Henry

Thank you for editing and locking Ed Henrys profile. His kids do not deserve this Milam77 (talk) 03:25, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Another admin, User:Malcolmxl5, was there before me, and did the protection and most/all of the cleanup. I just made a few small edits after that. But the page should be okay for the time being. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

I really do appreciate all the work. His kids do not deserve any of this. Milam77 (talk) 03:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Of course, happy to help. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

This is going to go on all night...bless it Milam77 (talk) 04:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Happy turkey day

Northamerica1000 is wishing you a happy Thanksgiving. If you don't celebrate Thanksgiving, don't forget that "Any time is turkey time" (see image). North America1000 06:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Douchebag article

Did you mean to set full protection on this article indefinitely? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes. Before that, it was fully protected for about two and then one years, and then off and on for a few years before that. Since this is a just a disambiguation page, I was more liberal with the length than I would ordinarily be. Extended confirmed protection hasn't been used there yet, so that will probably be worth a look at some point. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

You may want to disable talk page access here also. -- Longhair\talk 06:19, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Okay. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:20, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bongwarrior. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Chia Pets Indefinite Protection

Hello,

I see you have semi-protected the page for Chia Pets. I am aware this page was under persistent sock-puppetry, but this occurred in June 2016. Now that Wave 18 is out for the Chia pets, more edits and work should be added to further document the new products. I ask that you consider removing the protection set, as a years and a half is more then enough time to keep a page locked to users unconfirmed. (I was the first edit in 5 months). Thank you for your time and contact me if you have any questions.

WizardNinjaPirate (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to, but I don't think it would be a good idea. The problems there have been ongoing, and the user is still active. The disruption continued after a three-year semiprotection, a one-year semiprotection, and five other shorter protections. It's a worthwhile suggestion, and I'm often willing to try unprotection on something I've indefinitely protected, but I don't think it would work there and would just end up being re-protected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:23, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

I get it, thanks for looking into it though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WizardNinjaPirate (talkcontribs) 12:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)