User talk:Barrow1965
April 2021[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Thunderbirds episodes have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Thunderbirds episodes was changed by Barrow1965 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-04-04T16:14:27+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ahmetlii. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Thunderbirds 2086, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ahmetlii (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Pit of Peril. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Ahmetlii (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- But that was a SCREENSHOT from an episode!Barrow1965 (talk) 19:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Thunderbirds (TV series).
I shouldn't need to explain the reasons for this warning; they've been explained to you many times on the talk pages of the various IP addresses you used before. If you continue to edit disruptively, you will be blocked from editing. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Century 21 Merchandising, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
- If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
- If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
- If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;
If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead.
Do not link to copyright violations on YouTube. See WP:YOUTUBE for further information.
SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:54, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at The Secret Service, you may be blocked from editing. If your edit summary is referring to the decade setting category, see this talk page post for the rationale behind the removal.
Do not revert constructive changes with irrelevant and confusing edit summaries like "It says it's set in the then present day". Any repetitions of this will be reported to WP:ANI. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 11:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Thunderbirds 2086 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 15:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 14:27, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)May 2021[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Thunderbirds episodes.
I urge you once again to review WP:RS and WP:OR. Any repetitions will be reported to WP:ANI. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 09:09, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kingsif (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mfield (Oi!) 18:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Emma Watson[edit]
For consistency with Catherine Zeta-Jones, Karen Gillan, and Lily James, I think it's best for the "English" terminology to remain. "British" is too broad, given that the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland comprises of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, there is very much a difference. Watson does not carry French citizenship, and was largely raised in England.--Bettydaisies (talk) 19:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- In addition, please observe WP:UKNATIONALS, where you'll find that users are not to enforce uniformity in the way that you've been changing existing nationalities to "British". Please discuss proposed changes on the talk pages. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 01:11, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Bale. KyleJoantalk 08:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
ANI notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 09:23, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)