User talk:Ayazf

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ayazf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 08:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone tell me how to insert a photograph in a biography? Thanks

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ayazf/sandbox/ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ayazf, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pic Insert[edit]

See my reply for your question at Help Desk (in archives now). --CiaPan (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lon Safko (March 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lon Safko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ayazf. You have new messages at Timtrent's talk page.
Message added 07:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fiddle Faddle 07:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing for pay or other consideration[edit]

On my talk page you have stated that you are editing Wikipedia for a client, and that you wish to enjoy being part of Wikipedia for a long time to come (my paraphrasing). If you intend to do this on behalf of clients you must read WP:PAY and understand how to proceed. Fiddle Faddle 08:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ayazf, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 11:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ayazf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for about 2 years now and during this periods I have avoided to create a new account as I now perfectly well understand the policies and rules of Wikipedia. As I am very much interested to contribute in a meaningful manner and become a valued member of the Wikipedia community. I am thus requesting for the block to me removed. I promise not to violate the Wikipedia policies in future.

Decline reason:

The AN discussion (permalink) was archived before closure, but the consensus at the point of archiving appears to be opposd to an unblock. I am therefore closing this appeal as declined. You may re-request unblock under the terms of the standard offer after February 2nd, 2018. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ayazf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18939 was submitted on Aug 08, 2017 06:01:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lonsafko (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)Ayazf did nothing wrong. He was only trying to help. Sockpuppetry?! Seriously... The problem stemmed from your editors zeal to block information. Five years ago, I created an autobiographical page. Every one of my accomplishments were rejected time and again. I had a year long conversation with the editor to try to convince him that all the claims I was making was completely truthful and valid. Many of the accomplishments were made before the invention of the Internet and the editor continuously insisted on "Independent Internet Sources" of which there weren't any. The editors continuous complaint was, that the entries were "auto-biographical". Out of shear frustration, I gave up and asked Ayazf to try to complete the page. That's when you began to attack him as well. Ayazf only tried to complete my page. He was only trying to do the right thing. I completely understand your passion for correct information and the integrity of the Wikipedia resource, I also understand the daily attempts you face with people trying to post incorrect information, but instead of constantly attacking and shooting down information, how about we try an open, mutual, and beneficial conversation. For the sake of Wikipedia. The information we are trying so desperately to add is true and needs to be part of Wikipedia. Ask Jimmy Wales about me and our conversation about immortalizing him in my book, The Social Media Bible. We both share a passion for documentation. I have been a supporter of Wikipedia since it's beginning. So, can someone please contact me at [email protected] so we can have a conversation and get this resolved. Thank you. Lon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lonsafko (talk • contribs) 10:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]